Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02314247 · OUTCOME

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Efficacy and Safety Study of Selinexor in Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma or Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma · Source last updated 2023-01-26

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
Percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
80% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.

What was measured

Overall Response (OR) = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment. Progression was defined as the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD) per the revised response criteria. Clinical disease progression in the absence of formal criteria for PD must be documented by a physician.

Analysis population: Due to the limited enrollment in this study, only the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population, consisting of all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment (which is identical to the Safety Population), was evaluated for efficacy.

Groups in this outcome

Selinexor (PTCL)

Assigned to 60 mg dose, 6 doses/cycle

Selinexor (CTCL)

Assigned to 60 mg dose, 6 doses/cycle (6 patients); Assigned to 60 mg dose, 8 doses/cycle (1 patient)

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Selinexor (PTCL)9
Selinexor (CTCL)7

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 80% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Selinexor (PTCL)11.1Not reported1.236.8Not reported
Selinexor (CTCL)14.3Not reported1.545.3Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        1.2
        upper Limit
        36.8
        value
        11.1
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        1.5
        upper Limit
        45.3
        value
        14.3
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      9
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      7
    units
    Participants
description
Overall Response (OR) = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment. Progression was defined as the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD) per the revised response criteria. Clinical disease progression in the absence of formal criteria for PD must be documented by a physician.
dispersion Type
80% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Assigned to 60 mg dose, 6 doses/cycle
    id
    OG000
    title
    Selinexor (PTCL)
  2. description
    Assigned to 60 mg dose, 6 doses/cycle (6 patients); Assigned to 60 mg dose, 8 doses/cycle (1 patient)
    id
    OG001
    title
    Selinexor (CTCL)
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
Due to the limited enrollment in this study, only the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population, consisting of all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment (which is identical to the Safety Population), was evaluated for efficacy.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
title
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice