Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02301039 · OUTCOME

Objective Response Rate

SARC028: A Phase II Study of the Anti-PD1 Antibody Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Patients With Advanced Sarcomas · Source last updated 2020-09-29

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
Unit
Participants
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
Assessments will be conducted at 8 weeks, up to 5 years

What was measured

The Objective Response Rate (ORR) is the percentage of patient's tumor that shrinks or disappears after treatment. ORR will be evaluated according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) 1.1, whereby Complete Response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and Partial Response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions in reference to the baseline diameters. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Analysis population: There were 40 of 42 patients in the soft tissue sarcoma cohort who were evaluable for response. There were 40 of 42 patients in the bone sarcoma cohort who were evaluable for response. There were 53 of 60 patients in the expansion cohort who were evaluable for response.

Groups in this outcome

Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Patients with the following types of soft tissue sarcoma: leiomyosarcoma, poorly differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcoma, high grade pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma/MFH, MPNST and synovial sarcoma). Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks Pembrolizumab

Bone Sarcoma

Patients with the following types of bone sarcoma: Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, and chondrosarcoma \[de-differentiated or mesenchymal\]. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks Pembrolizumab

Expansion Cohort

Patients with the following types of soft tissue sarcoma: poorly differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcoma, high grade pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Soft Tissue Sarcoma40
Bone Sarcoma40
Expansion Cohort53

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Soft Tissue Sarcoma7Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Bone Sarcoma2Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Expansion Cohort7Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    7.3
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    32.8
    estimate Comment
    Clopper-Pearson (Exact) Confidence Interval. Excluded from rate due to no response evaluation: Soft Tissue: 2; Bone: 2; Expansion: 7 patients
    group Description
    An objective response rate of 25% will be considered clinically meaningful and a response rate less than 10% will be considered lack of efficacy. The treatment will be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients have a PR or better by RECIST 1.1.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Comment
    An objective response rate of 25% will be considered clinically meaningful and a response rate less than 10% will be considered lack of efficacy. The treatment will be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients have a PR or better by RECIST 1.1.
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    param Type
    Binomial estimate of response rate of PR
    param Value
    17.5
  2. ci Lower Limit
    1.0
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    16.9
    estimate Comment
    Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval; Excluded from rate due to no response evaluation: Soft Tissue: 2; Bone: 2; Expansion: 7 patients
    group Description
    An objective response rate of 25% will be considered clinically meaningful and a response rate less than 10% will be considered lack of efficacy. The treatment will be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients have a PR or better by RECIST 1.1.
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    param Type
    Binomial estimate of response rate of PR
    param Value
    5.0
  3. ci Lower Limit
    5.5
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    25.3
    estimate Comment
    Clopper-Pearson (Exact) Confidence Interval Excluded from rate due to no response evaluation: Soft Tissue: 2; Bone: 2; Expansion: 7 patients
    group Description
    An objective response rate of 25% will be considered clinically meaningful and a response rate less than 10% will be considered lack of efficacy. The treatment will be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients have a PR or better by RECIST 1.1.
    group Ids
    1. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    param Type
    Binomial estimate of response rate of PR
    param Value
    13.0
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    7.3
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    32.8
    estimate Comment
    Clopper-Pearson (Exact) Confidence Interval. Excluded from rate due to no response evaluation: Soft Tissue: 2; Bone: 2; Expansion: 7 patients
    group Description
    An objective response rate of 25% will be considered clinically meaningful and a response rate less than 10% will be considered lack of efficacy. The treatment will be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients have a PR or better by RECIST 1.1.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Comment
    An objective response rate of 25% will be considered clinically meaningful and a response rate less than 10% will be considered lack of efficacy. The treatment will be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients have a PR or better by RECIST 1.1.
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    param Type
    Binomial estimate of response rate of PR
    param Value
    17.5
  2. ci Lower Limit
    1.0
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    16.9
    estimate Comment
    Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval; Excluded from rate due to no response evaluation: Soft Tissue: 2; Bone: 2; Expansion: 7 patients
    group Description
    An objective response rate of 25% will be considered clinically meaningful and a response rate less than 10% will be considered lack of efficacy. The treatment will be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients have a PR or better by RECIST 1.1.
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    param Type
    Binomial estimate of response rate of PR
    param Value
    5.0
  3. ci Lower Limit
    5.5
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    25.3
    estimate Comment
    Clopper-Pearson (Exact) Confidence Interval Excluded from rate due to no response evaluation: Soft Tissue: 2; Bone: 2; Expansion: 7 patients
    group Description
    An objective response rate of 25% will be considered clinically meaningful and a response rate less than 10% will be considered lack of efficacy. The treatment will be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients have a PR or better by RECIST 1.1.
    group Ids
    1. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    param Type
    Binomial estimate of response rate of PR
    param Value
    13.0
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        7
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        2
      3. group Id
        OG002
        value
        7
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      40
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      40
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      53
    units
    Participants
description
The Objective Response Rate (ORR) is the percentage of patient's tumor that shrinks or disappears after treatment. ORR will be evaluated according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) 1.1, whereby Complete Response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and Partial Response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions in reference to the baseline diameters. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
groups
  1. description
    Patients with the following types of soft tissue sarcoma: leiomyosarcoma, poorly differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcoma, high grade pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma/MFH, MPNST and synovial sarcoma). Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks Pembrolizumab
    id
    OG000
    title
    Soft Tissue Sarcoma
  2. description
    Patients with the following types of bone sarcoma: Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, and chondrosarcoma \[de-differentiated or mesenchymal\]. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks Pembrolizumab
    id
    OG001
    title
    Bone Sarcoma
  3. description
    Patients with the following types of soft tissue sarcoma: poorly differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcoma, high grade pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks
    id
    OG002
    title
    Expansion Cohort
param Type
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
population Description
There were 40 of 42 patients in the soft tissue sarcoma cohort who were evaluable for response. There were 40 of 42 patients in the bone sarcoma cohort who were evaluable for response. There were 53 of 60 patients in the expansion cohort who were evaluable for response.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Assessments will be conducted at 8 weeks, up to 5 years
title
Objective Response Rate
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice