Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score
Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2025-10-20
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
Unit
Score on scale
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline (Day -24) and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 and 66 (each Cycle of 28 days)
What was measured
EQ-5D-5L was standardized, participant-reported questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. EQ-5D-5L included 2 components: EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and EQ-5D-5L VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provided a profile of participant's health state 5 dimensions (5D): mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflected increasing levels of difficulty. Participants indicated their health state by selecting the most appropriate level in each of the 5D. Responses to the 5D scores were combined and converted into single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (0.0- worst health state) to 1 (1.0- better health state) representing the general health status of individual (but allows for values less than 0 by United kingdom scoring algorithm). Higher score indicated better health state.
Analysis population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
Groups in this outcome
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
Participants received Lenalidomide 25 milligrams (mg) capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously (IV) once a week (QW) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.5 months. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria).
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
Participants received Daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) IV QW for the first 8 weeks (cycles 1-2) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks (Cycle 3-6), then every 4 weeks (Q4W) (from Cycle 7 and beyond) (each cycle of 28 days), Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or IV QW until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.3 months. After implementation of Amendment 8, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
286
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
302
Reported measurements
Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
286
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
302
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.081
Not reported
0.058
0.103
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.097
Not reported
0.074
0.119
Not reported
Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
252
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
287
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.111
Not reported
0.087
0.135
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.13
Not reported
0.107
0.152
Not reported
Cycle 9 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
221
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
267
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.113
Not reported
0.088
0.138
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.124
Not reported
0.101
0.147
Not reported
Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
227
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
261
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.103
Not reported
0.078
0.128
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.132
Not reported
0.108
0.155
Not reported
Cycle 18 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
180
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
242
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.089
Not reported
0.062
0.116
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.116
Not reported
0.092
0.14
Not reported
Cycle 24 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
154
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
227
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.088
Not reported
0.059
0.116
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.121
Not reported
0.096
0.145
Not reported
Cycle 30 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
133
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
198
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.088
Not reported
0.058
0.118
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.102
Not reported
0.076
0.127
Not reported
Cycle 36 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
115
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
195
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.099
Not reported
0.067
0.131
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.109
Not reported
0.083
0.135
Not reported
Cycle 42 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
99
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
178
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.062
Not reported
0.028
0.096
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.113
Not reported
0.086
0.14
Not reported
Cycle 48 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
79
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
162
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.075
Not reported
0.038
0.112
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.082
Not reported
0.055
0.11
Not reported
Cycle 54 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
64
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
141
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.05
Not reported
0.01
0.091
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.087
Not reported
0.058
0.116
Not reported
Cycle 60 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
44
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
112
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.068
Not reported
0.02
0.115
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.079
Not reported
0.047
0.111
Not reported
Cycle 66 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
26
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
74
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
0.041
Not reported
-0.019
0.102
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
0.111
Not reported
0.073
0.148
Not reported
Source statistical analyses
Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.
ci Lower Limit
-0.015
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.046
group Description
Cycle 3 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3069
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.016
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.013
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.05
group Description
Cycle 6 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.2472
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.019
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.021
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.044
group Description
Cycle 9 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.4972
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.011
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.004
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.062
group Description
Cycle 12 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0841
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.029
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.008
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.062
group Description
Cycle 18 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1296
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.027
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.003
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.07
group Description
Cycle 24 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0762
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.033
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.025
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.052
group Description
Cycle 30 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.4859
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.014
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.029
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.051
group Description
Cycle 36 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.6031
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.011
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
0.009
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.093
group Description
Cycle 42 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0178
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.051
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.038
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.053
group Description
Cycle 48 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.7460
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.007
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.012
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.086
group Description
Cycle 54 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1394
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.037
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.045
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.068
group Description
Cycle 60 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.6982
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.011
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
Complete source fields
analyses
ci Lower Limit
-0.015
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.046
group Description
Cycle 3 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3069
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.016
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.013
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.05
group Description
Cycle 6 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.2472
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.019
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.021
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.044
group Description
Cycle 9 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.4972
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.011
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.004
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.062
group Description
Cycle 12 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0841
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.029
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.008
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.062
group Description
Cycle 18 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1296
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.027
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.003
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.07
group Description
Cycle 24 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0762
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.033
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.025
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.052
group Description
Cycle 30 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.4859
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.014
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.029
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.051
group Description
Cycle 36 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.6031
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.011
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
0.009
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.093
group Description
Cycle 42 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0178
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.051
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.038
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.053
group Description
Cycle 48 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.7460
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.007
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.012
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.086
group Description
Cycle 54 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1394
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.037
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.045
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
0.068
group Description
Cycle 60 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.6982
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
0.011
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.058
upper Limit
0.103
value
0.081
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.074
upper Limit
0.119
value
0.097
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
286
group Id
OG001
value
302
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.087
upper Limit
0.135
value
0.111
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.107
upper Limit
0.152
value
0.13
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
252
group Id
OG001
value
287
units
Participants
title
Cycle 6 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.088
upper Limit
0.138
value
0.113
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.101
upper Limit
0.147
value
0.124
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
221
group Id
OG001
value
267
units
Participants
title
Cycle 9 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.078
upper Limit
0.128
value
0.103
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.108
upper Limit
0.155
value
0.132
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
227
group Id
OG001
value
261
units
Participants
title
Cycle 12 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.062
upper Limit
0.116
value
0.089
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.092
upper Limit
0.14
value
0.116
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
180
group Id
OG001
value
242
units
Participants
title
Cycle 18 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.059
upper Limit
0.116
value
0.088
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.096
upper Limit
0.145
value
0.121
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
154
group Id
OG001
value
227
units
Participants
title
Cycle 24 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.058
upper Limit
0.118
value
0.088
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.076
upper Limit
0.127
value
0.102
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
133
group Id
OG001
value
198
units
Participants
title
Cycle 30 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.067
upper Limit
0.131
value
0.099
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.083
upper Limit
0.135
value
0.109
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
115
group Id
OG001
value
195
units
Participants
title
Cycle 36 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.028
upper Limit
0.096
value
0.062
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.086
upper Limit
0.14
value
0.113
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
99
group Id
OG001
value
178
units
Participants
title
Cycle 42 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.038
upper Limit
0.112
value
0.075
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.055
upper Limit
0.11
value
0.082
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
79
group Id
OG001
value
162
units
Participants
title
Cycle 48 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.01
upper Limit
0.091
value
0.05
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.058
upper Limit
0.116
value
0.087
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
141
units
Participants
title
Cycle 54 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.02
upper Limit
0.115
value
0.068
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.047
upper Limit
0.111
value
0.079
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
44
group Id
OG001
value
112
units
Participants
title
Cycle 60 Day 1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
286
group Id
OG001
value
302
units
Participants
description
EQ-5D-5L was standardized, participant-reported questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. EQ-5D-5L included 2 components: EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and EQ-5D-5L VAS. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provided a profile of participant's health state 5 dimensions (5D): mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflected increasing levels of difficulty. Participants indicated their health state by selecting the most appropriate level in each of the 5D. Responses to the 5D scores were combined and converted into single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (0.0- worst health state) to 1 (1.0- better health state) representing the general health status of individual (but allows for values less than 0 by United kingdom scoring algorithm). Higher score indicated better health state.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
description
Participants received Lenalidomide 25 milligrams (mg) capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously (IV) once a week (QW) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.5 months. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria).
id
OG000
title
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
description
Participants received Daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) IV QW for the first 8 weeks (cycles 1-2) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks (Cycle 3-6), then every 4 weeks (Q4W) (from Cycle 7 and beyond) (each cycle of 28 days), Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or IV QW until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.3 months. After implementation of Amendment 8, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).
id
OG001
title
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
param Type
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
population Description
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline (Day -24) and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 and 66 (each Cycle of 28 days)
title
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score