Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2025-10-20
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
Unit
Score on scale
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline (Day -24) and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 and 66 (each Cycle of 28 days)
What was measured
EQ-5D-5L was a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale was designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
Analysis population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
Groups in this outcome
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
Participants received Lenalidomide 25 milligrams (mg) capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously (IV) once a week (QW) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.5 months. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria).
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
Participants received Daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) IV QW for the first 8 weeks (cycles 1-2) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks (Cycle 3-6), then every 4 weeks (Q4W) (from Cycle 7 and beyond) (each cycle of 28 days), Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or IV QW until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.3 months. After implementation of Amendment 8, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
286
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
301
Reported measurements
Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
286
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
301
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
2.1
Not reported
0.3
4
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
4.2
Not reported
2.3
6
Not reported
Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
252
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
287
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.8
Not reported
2.8
6.8
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
7.6
Not reported
5.8
9.5
Not reported
Cycle 9 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
221
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
267
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
7
Not reported
5
9.1
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
9.6
Not reported
7.7
11.5
Not reported
Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
227
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
261
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
3.6
Not reported
1.6
5.7
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
9.4
Not reported
7.4
11.3
Not reported
Cycle 18 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
180
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
242
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
5.4
Not reported
3.2
7.6
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
7.4
Not reported
5.4
9.4
Not reported
Cycle 24 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
154
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
227
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.3
Not reported
2
6.7
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
7
Not reported
5
9
Not reported
Cycle 30 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
133
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
198
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.6
Not reported
2.1
7
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
6.9
Not reported
4.8
9.1
Not reported
Cycle 36 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
115
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
195
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.9
Not reported
2.3
7.5
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
8.1
Not reported
6
10.2
Not reported
Cycle 42 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
99
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
178
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.6
Not reported
1.8
7.3
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
5.6
Not reported
3.4
7.8
Not reported
Cycle 48 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
79
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
162
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
5.5
Not reported
2.4
8.5
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
6.7
Not reported
4.5
9
Not reported
Cycle 54 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
64
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
141
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
3.4
Not reported
0.1
6.7
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
5.8
Not reported
3.4
8.2
Not reported
Cycle 60 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
44
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
112
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
5.8
Not reported
1.9
9.6
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
5.2
Not reported
2.6
7.8
Not reported
Cycle 66 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
26
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
74
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
6.9
Not reported
2
11.8
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
5.6
Not reported
2.5
8.7
Not reported
Source statistical analyses
Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.
ci Lower Limit
-0.5
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.5
group Description
Cycle 3 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1176
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
0.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.4
group Description
Cycle 6 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0336
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.3
group Description
Cycle 9 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0653
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.6
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
3
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
8.5
group Description
Cycle 12 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0000
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
5.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.9
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.8
group Description
Cycle 18 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1805
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.3
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.7
group Description
Cycle 24 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0783
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.7
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.8
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.5
group Description
Cycle 30 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1422
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.4
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.1
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
6.5
group Description
Cycle 36 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0575
param Type
Least Square Mean
param Value
3.2
statistical Method
Least Square Mean Difference
ci Lower Limit
-2.4
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.5
group Description
Cycle 42 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.5339
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.1
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-2.4
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5
group Description
Cycle 48 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.5015
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.3
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.7
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
6.3
group Description
Cycle 54 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.2512
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.3
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-5.1
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.1
group Description
Cycle 60 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.8246
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
-0.5
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
Complete source fields
analyses
ci Lower Limit
-0.5
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.5
group Description
Cycle 3 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1176
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
0.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.4
group Description
Cycle 6 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0336
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.3
group Description
Cycle 9 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0653
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.6
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
3
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
8.5
group Description
Cycle 12 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0000
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
5.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.9
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.8
group Description
Cycle 18 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1805
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.3
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.7
group Description
Cycle 24 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0783
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.7
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.8
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.5
group Description
Cycle 30 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1422
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.4
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-0.1
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
6.5
group Description
Cycle 36 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0575
param Type
Least Square Mean
param Value
3.2
statistical Method
Least Square Mean Difference
ci Lower Limit
-2.4
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.5
group Description
Cycle 42 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.5339
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.1
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-2.4
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5
group Description
Cycle 48 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.5015
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.3
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.7
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
6.3
group Description
Cycle 54 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.2512
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.3
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-5.1
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.1
group Description
Cycle 60 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.8246
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
-0.5
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.3
upper Limit
4
value
2.1
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
2.3
upper Limit
6
value
4.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
286
group Id
OG001
value
301
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.8
upper Limit
6.8
value
4.8
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
5.8
upper Limit
9.5
value
7.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
252
group Id
OG001
value
287
units
Participants
title
Cycle 6 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
5
upper Limit
9.1
value
7
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
7.7
upper Limit
11.5
value
9.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
221
group Id
OG001
value
267
units
Participants
title
Cycle 9 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
1.6
upper Limit
5.7
value
3.6
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
7.4
upper Limit
11.3
value
9.4
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
227
group Id
OG001
value
261
units
Participants
title
Cycle 12 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.2
upper Limit
7.6
value
5.4
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
5.4
upper Limit
9.4
value
7.4
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
180
group Id
OG001
value
242
units
Participants
title
Cycle 18 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2
upper Limit
6.7
value
4.3
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
5
upper Limit
9
value
7
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
154
group Id
OG001
value
227
units
Participants
title
Cycle 24 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.1
upper Limit
7
value
4.6
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
4.8
upper Limit
9.1
value
6.9
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
133
group Id
OG001
value
198
units
Participants
title
Cycle 30 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.3
upper Limit
7.5
value
4.9
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
6
upper Limit
10.2
value
8.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
115
group Id
OG001
value
195
units
Participants
title
Cycle 36 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
1.8
upper Limit
7.3
value
4.6
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
3.4
upper Limit
7.8
value
5.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
99
group Id
OG001
value
178
units
Participants
title
Cycle 42 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.4
upper Limit
8.5
value
5.5
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
4.5
upper Limit
9
value
6.7
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
79
group Id
OG001
value
162
units
Participants
title
Cycle 48 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.1
upper Limit
6.7
value
3.4
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
3.4
upper Limit
8.2
value
5.8
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
141
units
Participants
title
Cycle 54 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
1.9
upper Limit
9.6
value
5.8
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
2.6
upper Limit
7.8
value
5.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
44
group Id
OG001
value
112
units
Participants
title
Cycle 60 Day 1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
286
group Id
OG001
value
301
units
Participants
description
EQ-5D-5L was a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale was designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
description
Participants received Lenalidomide 25 milligrams (mg) capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously (IV) once a week (QW) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.5 months. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria).
id
OG000
title
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
description
Participants received Daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) IV QW for the first 8 weeks (cycles 1-2) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks (Cycle 3-6), then every 4 weeks (Q4W) (from Cycle 7 and beyond) (each cycle of 28 days), Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or IV QW until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.3 months. After implementation of Amendment 8, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).
id
OG001
title
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
param Type
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
population Description
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline (Day -24) and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 and 66 (each Cycle of 28 days)
title
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)