Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02252172 · OUTCOME

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 Global Health Status Score

Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2025-10-20

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
Unit
Score on scale
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline (Day -24) and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 and 66 (each Cycle of 28 days)

What was measured

EORTC QLQ-C30 was 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Questionnaire included 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from "1-not at all" to "4-very much" to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall health related QoL. Scores were transformed to 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores represented better GHS and functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values showed deterioration in quality of life or functioning and reduction in symptom and positive values indicated improvement and worsening of symptoms.

Analysis population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

Groups in this outcome

Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)

Participants received Lenalidomide 25 milligrams (mg) capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously (IV) once a week (QW) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.5 months. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria).

Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)

Participants received Daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) IV QW for the first 8 weeks (cycles 1-2) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks (Cycle 3-6), then every 4 weeks (Q4W) (from Cycle 7 and beyond) (each cycle of 28 days), Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or IV QW until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.3 months. After implementation of Amendment 8, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)295
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)314

Reported measurements

Cycle 3 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)295
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)314
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)1.4Not reported-0.73.5Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)3.8Not reported1.75.8Not reported
Cycle 6 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)267
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)304
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)4.8Not reported2.67Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)6.3Not reported4.38.4Not reported
Cycle 9 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)229
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)278
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)5.7Not reported3.48Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)7.5Not reported5.49.7Not reported
Cycle 12 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)231
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)274
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)4.5Not reported2.26.8Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)7.8Not reported5.69.9Not reported
Cycle 18 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)186
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)253
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)4.7Not reported2.27.2Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)6.4Not reported4.18.6Not reported
Cycle 24 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)161
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)238
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)4.7Not reported2.17.4Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)6.3Not reported4.18.6Not reported
Cycle 30 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)140
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)213
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)4.5Not reported1.77.3Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)5.5Not reported3.17.9Not reported
Cycle 36 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)119
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)207
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)5Not reported28Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)7.7Not reported5.310.1Not reported
Cycle 42 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)100
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)184
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)3.8Not reported0.67Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)5.6Not reported3.18.1Not reported
Cycle 48 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)80
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)170
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)3.4Not reported-0.16.9Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)4.2Not reported1.66.7Not reported
Cycle 54 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)64
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)145
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)6.1Not reported2.29.9Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)4.8Not reported27.5Not reported
Cycle 60 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)46
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)114
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)4.9Not reported0.49.4Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)4.1Not reported1.17.1Not reported
Cycle 66 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)26
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)78
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)7.1Not reported1.312.8Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)7.7Not reported4.211.2Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    -0.4
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5.2
    group Description
    For Cycle 3 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.0986
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    2.4
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  2. ci Lower Limit
    -1.4
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.4
    group Description
    Cycle 6 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.3042
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.5
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  3. ci Lower Limit
    -1.2
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.9
    group Description
    Cycle 9 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.2339
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.8
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  4. ci Lower Limit
    0.2
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    6.3
    group Description
    Cycle 12 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.0365
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    3.3
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  5. ci Lower Limit
    -1.6
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.9
    group Description
    Cycle 18 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.3093
    p Value Comment
    Cycle 24 Day 1
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.7
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  6. ci Lower Limit
    -1.8
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5
    group Description
    Cycle 24 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.3481
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.6
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  7. ci Lower Limit
    -2.6
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.6
    group Description
    Cycle 30 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.5825
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  8. ci Lower Limit
    -1
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    6.4
    group Description
    Cycle 36 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.1566
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    2.7
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  9. ci Lower Limit
    -2.2
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5.7
    group Description
    Cycle 42 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.3858
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.8
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  10. ci Lower Limit
    -3.5
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5
    group Description
    Cycle 48 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.7296
    param Type
    Least Square Mean
    param Value
    0.8
    statistical Method
    Least Square Mean Difference
  11. ci Lower Limit
    -6
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    3.3
    group Description
    Cycle 54 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.5793
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    -1.3
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  12. ci Lower Limit
    -6.1
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.5
    group Description
    Cycle 60 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.7756
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    -0.8
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    -0.4
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5.2
    group Description
    For Cycle 3 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.0986
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    2.4
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  2. ci Lower Limit
    -1.4
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.4
    group Description
    Cycle 6 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.3042
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.5
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  3. ci Lower Limit
    -1.2
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.9
    group Description
    Cycle 9 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.2339
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.8
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  4. ci Lower Limit
    0.2
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    6.3
    group Description
    Cycle 12 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.0365
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    3.3
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  5. ci Lower Limit
    -1.6
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.9
    group Description
    Cycle 18 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.3093
    p Value Comment
    Cycle 24 Day 1
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.7
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  6. ci Lower Limit
    -1.8
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5
    group Description
    Cycle 24 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.3481
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.6
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  7. ci Lower Limit
    -2.6
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.6
    group Description
    Cycle 30 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.5825
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  8. ci Lower Limit
    -1
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    6.4
    group Description
    Cycle 36 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.1566
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    2.7
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  9. ci Lower Limit
    -2.2
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5.7
    group Description
    Cycle 42 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.3858
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    1.8
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  10. ci Lower Limit
    -3.5
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5
    group Description
    Cycle 48 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.7296
    param Type
    Least Square Mean
    param Value
    0.8
    statistical Method
    Least Square Mean Difference
  11. ci Lower Limit
    -6
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    3.3
    group Description
    Cycle 54 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.5793
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    -1.3
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
  12. ci Lower Limit
    -6.1
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.5
    group Description
    Cycle 60 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.7756
    param Type
    Least Square Mean Difference
    param Value
    -0.8
    statistical Method
    Mixed Models Analysis
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        -0.7
        upper Limit
        3.5
        value
        1.4
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        1.7
        upper Limit
        5.8
        value
        3.8
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        295
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        314
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 3 Day 1
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        2.6
        upper Limit
        7
        value
        4.8
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        4.3
        upper Limit
        8.4
        value
        6.3
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        267
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        304
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 6 Day 1
  3. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        3.4
        upper Limit
        8
        value
        5.7
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        5.4
        upper Limit
        9.7
        value
        7.5
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        229
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        278
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 9 Day 1
  4. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        2.2
        upper Limit
        6.8
        value
        4.5
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        5.6
        upper Limit
        9.9
        value
        7.8
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        231
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        274
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 12 Day 1
  5. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        2.2
        upper Limit
        7.2
        value
        4.7
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        4.1
        upper Limit
        8.6
        value
        6.4
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        186
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        253
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 18 Day 1
  6. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        2.1
        upper Limit
        7.4
        value
        4.7
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        4.1
        upper Limit
        8.6
        value
        6.3
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        161
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        238
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 24 Day 1
  7. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        1.7
        upper Limit
        7.3
        value
        4.5
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        3.1
        upper Limit
        7.9
        value
        5.5
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        140
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        213
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 30 Day 1
  8. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        2
        upper Limit
        8
        value
        5
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        5.3
        upper Limit
        10.1
        value
        7.7
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        119
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        207
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 36 Day 1
  9. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        0.6
        upper Limit
        7
        value
        3.8
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        3.1
        upper Limit
        8.1
        value
        5.6
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        100
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        184
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 42 Day 1
  10. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        -0.1
        upper Limit
        6.9
        value
        3.4
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        1.6
        upper Limit
        6.7
        value
        4.2
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        80
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        170
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 48 Day 1
  11. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        2.2
        upper Limit
        9.9
        value
        6.1
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        2
        upper Limit
        7.5
        value
        4.8
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        64
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        145
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 54 Day 1
  12. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        0.4
        upper Limit
        9.4
        value
        4.9
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        1.1
        upper Limit
        7.1
        value
        4.1
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        46
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        114
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 60 Day 1
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      295
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      314
    units
    Participants
description
EORTC QLQ-C30 was 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Questionnaire included 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from "1-not at all" to "4-very much" to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall health related QoL. Scores were transformed to 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores represented better GHS and functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values showed deterioration in quality of life or functioning and reduction in symptom and positive values indicated improvement and worsening of symptoms.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received Lenalidomide 25 milligrams (mg) capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously (IV) once a week (QW) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.5 months. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria).
    id
    OG000
    title
    Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
  2. description
    Participants received Daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) IV QW for the first 8 weeks (cycles 1-2) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks (Cycle 3-6), then every 4 weeks (Q4W) (from Cycle 7 and beyond) (each cycle of 28 days), Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or IV QW until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.3 months. After implementation of Amendment 8, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).
    id
    OG001
    title
    Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
param Type
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
population Description
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline (Day -24) and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 and 66 (each Cycle of 28 days)
title
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 Global Health Status Score
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Score on scale

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice