Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 Global Health Status Score
Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2025-10-20
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
Unit
Score on scale
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline (Day -24) and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 and 66 (each Cycle of 28 days)
What was measured
EORTC QLQ-C30 was 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Questionnaire included 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from "1-not at all" to "4-very much" to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall health related QoL. Scores were transformed to 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores represented better GHS and functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values showed deterioration in quality of life or functioning and reduction in symptom and positive values indicated improvement and worsening of symptoms.
Analysis population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
Groups in this outcome
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
Participants received Lenalidomide 25 milligrams (mg) capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously (IV) once a week (QW) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.5 months. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria).
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
Participants received Daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) IV QW for the first 8 weeks (cycles 1-2) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks (Cycle 3-6), then every 4 weeks (Q4W) (from Cycle 7 and beyond) (each cycle of 28 days), Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or IV QW until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.3 months. After implementation of Amendment 8, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
295
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
314
Reported measurements
Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
295
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
314
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
1.4
Not reported
-0.7
3.5
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
3.8
Not reported
1.7
5.8
Not reported
Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
267
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
304
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.8
Not reported
2.6
7
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
6.3
Not reported
4.3
8.4
Not reported
Cycle 9 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
229
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
278
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
5.7
Not reported
3.4
8
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
7.5
Not reported
5.4
9.7
Not reported
Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
231
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
274
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.5
Not reported
2.2
6.8
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
7.8
Not reported
5.6
9.9
Not reported
Cycle 18 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
186
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
253
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.7
Not reported
2.2
7.2
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
6.4
Not reported
4.1
8.6
Not reported
Cycle 24 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
161
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
238
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.7
Not reported
2.1
7.4
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
6.3
Not reported
4.1
8.6
Not reported
Cycle 30 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
140
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
213
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.5
Not reported
1.7
7.3
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
5.5
Not reported
3.1
7.9
Not reported
Cycle 36 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
119
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
207
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
5
Not reported
2
8
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
7.7
Not reported
5.3
10.1
Not reported
Cycle 42 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
100
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
184
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
3.8
Not reported
0.6
7
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
5.6
Not reported
3.1
8.1
Not reported
Cycle 48 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
80
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
170
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
3.4
Not reported
-0.1
6.9
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
4.2
Not reported
1.6
6.7
Not reported
Cycle 54 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
64
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
145
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
6.1
Not reported
2.2
9.9
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
4.8
Not reported
2
7.5
Not reported
Cycle 60 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
46
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
114
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
4.9
Not reported
0.4
9.4
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
4.1
Not reported
1.1
7.1
Not reported
Cycle 66 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
26
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
78
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
7.1
Not reported
1.3
12.8
Not reported
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
7.7
Not reported
4.2
11.2
Not reported
Source statistical analyses
Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.
ci Lower Limit
-0.4
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.2
group Description
For Cycle 3 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0986
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.4
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.4
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.4
group Description
Cycle 6 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3042
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.5
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.9
group Description
Cycle 9 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.2339
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
0.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
6.3
group Description
Cycle 12 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0365
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
3.3
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.6
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.9
group Description
Cycle 18 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3093
p Value Comment
Cycle 24 Day 1
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.7
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.8
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5
group Description
Cycle 24 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3481
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.6
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-2.6
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.6
group Description
Cycle 30 Day 1
group Ids
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.5825
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
6.4
group Description
Cycle 36 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1566
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.7
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-2.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.7
group Description
Cycle 42 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3858
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-3.5
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5
group Description
Cycle 48 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.7296
param Type
Least Square Mean
param Value
0.8
statistical Method
Least Square Mean Difference
ci Lower Limit
-6
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
3.3
group Description
Cycle 54 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.5793
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
-1.3
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-6.1
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.5
group Description
Cycle 60 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.7756
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
-0.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
Complete source fields
analyses
ci Lower Limit
-0.4
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.2
group Description
For Cycle 3 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0986
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.4
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.4
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.4
group Description
Cycle 6 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3042
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.5
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.9
group Description
Cycle 9 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.2339
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
0.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
6.3
group Description
Cycle 12 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.0365
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
3.3
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.6
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.9
group Description
Cycle 18 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3093
p Value Comment
Cycle 24 Day 1
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.7
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1.8
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5
group Description
Cycle 24 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3481
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.6
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-2.6
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.6
group Description
Cycle 30 Day 1
group Ids
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.5825
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-1
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
6.4
group Description
Cycle 36 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.1566
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
2.7
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-2.2
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5.7
group Description
Cycle 42 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.3858
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
1.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-3.5
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
5
group Description
Cycle 48 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.7296
param Type
Least Square Mean
param Value
0.8
statistical Method
Least Square Mean Difference
ci Lower Limit
-6
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
3.3
group Description
Cycle 54 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.5793
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
-1.3
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
ci Lower Limit
-6.1
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
4.5
group Description
Cycle 60 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
=0.7756
param Type
Least Square Mean Difference
param Value
-0.8
statistical Method
Mixed Models Analysis
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-0.7
upper Limit
3.5
value
1.4
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
1.7
upper Limit
5.8
value
3.8
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
295
group Id
OG001
value
314
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.6
upper Limit
7
value
4.8
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
4.3
upper Limit
8.4
value
6.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
267
group Id
OG001
value
304
units
Participants
title
Cycle 6 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.4
upper Limit
8
value
5.7
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
5.4
upper Limit
9.7
value
7.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
229
group Id
OG001
value
278
units
Participants
title
Cycle 9 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.2
upper Limit
6.8
value
4.5
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
5.6
upper Limit
9.9
value
7.8
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
231
group Id
OG001
value
274
units
Participants
title
Cycle 12 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.2
upper Limit
7.2
value
4.7
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
4.1
upper Limit
8.6
value
6.4
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
186
group Id
OG001
value
253
units
Participants
title
Cycle 18 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.1
upper Limit
7.4
value
4.7
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
4.1
upper Limit
8.6
value
6.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
161
group Id
OG001
value
238
units
Participants
title
Cycle 24 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
1.7
upper Limit
7.3
value
4.5
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
3.1
upper Limit
7.9
value
5.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
140
group Id
OG001
value
213
units
Participants
title
Cycle 30 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2
upper Limit
8
value
5
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
5.3
upper Limit
10.1
value
7.7
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
119
group Id
OG001
value
207
units
Participants
title
Cycle 36 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.6
upper Limit
7
value
3.8
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
3.1
upper Limit
8.1
value
5.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
100
group Id
OG001
value
184
units
Participants
title
Cycle 42 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-0.1
upper Limit
6.9
value
3.4
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
1.6
upper Limit
6.7
value
4.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
80
group Id
OG001
value
170
units
Participants
title
Cycle 48 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.2
upper Limit
9.9
value
6.1
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
2
upper Limit
7.5
value
4.8
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
145
units
Participants
title
Cycle 54 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.4
upper Limit
9.4
value
4.9
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
1.1
upper Limit
7.1
value
4.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
46
group Id
OG001
value
114
units
Participants
title
Cycle 60 Day 1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
295
group Id
OG001
value
314
units
Participants
description
EORTC QLQ-C30 was 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Questionnaire included 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from "1-not at all" to "4-very much" to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall health related QoL. Scores were transformed to 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores represented better GHS and functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values showed deterioration in quality of life or functioning and reduction in symptom and positive values indicated improvement and worsening of symptoms.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
description
Participants received Lenalidomide 25 milligrams (mg) capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously (IV) once a week (QW) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.5 months. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria).
id
OG000
title
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)
description
Participants received Daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) IV QW for the first 8 weeks (cycles 1-2) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks (Cycle 3-6), then every 4 weeks (Q4W) (from Cycle 7 and beyond) (each cycle of 28 days), Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally daily on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or IV QW until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 77.3 months. After implementation of Amendment 8, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).
id
OG001
title
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)
param Type
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
population Description
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline (Day -24) and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 and 66 (each Cycle of 28 days)
title
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 Global Health Status Score