Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02180724 · OUTCOME

Overall Survival (OS) of Acalabrutinib by Investigator

An Open-label, Phase 2 Study of ACP-196 in Subjects With Waldenström Macroglobulinemia · Source last updated 2026-06-16

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
Percentage of subjects
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Primary analysis occur when all subjects have completed Cycle 27 or have discontinued before Cycle 27.

What was measured

Outcome Measure was pre-specified to summarize data per investigator assessment with respect to subject's vital/survival status is presented in the RRF and irrespective of iWWM 3rd or 6th criteria. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimates at a certain time (ex. all subjects complete Cycle 27) provides the estimated percentage of the subjects who are still alive by the given time over all patients at risk.

Analysis population: In the original protocol, previously treated subjects were planned to be randomized 1:1 into 2 cohorts: Cohort 1 to receive Acala 100 mg BID for 28 days and Cohort 2 to receive Acala 200 mg once daily (QD) for 28 days. After enrollment started, the dose regimen was amended. The 200 mg QD dose was eliminated, and subjects who were enrolled under the original protocol and received treatment with 200 mg QD were switched to 100 mg BID. Results are combined.

Groups in this outcome

Previously Treated (N=92)

100 mg BID N=87 + 200 mg QD N= 5

Treatment Naive (N=14)

100 mg BID N= 13 + 200 mg QD N=1

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Previously Treated (N=92)92
Treatment Naive (N=14)14

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Percentage of subjects · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Previously Treated (N=92)89.0Not reported80.693.9Not reported
Treatment Naive (N=14)90.9Not reported50.898.7Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        80.6
        upper Limit
        93.9
        value
        89.0
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        50.8
        upper Limit
        98.7
        value
        90.9
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      92
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      14
    units
    Participants
description
Outcome Measure was pre-specified to summarize data per investigator assessment with respect to subject's vital/survival status is presented in the RRF and irrespective of iWWM 3rd or 6th criteria. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimates at a certain time (ex. all subjects complete Cycle 27) provides the estimated percentage of the subjects who are still alive by the given time over all patients at risk.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    100 mg BID N=87 + 200 mg QD N= 5
    id
    OG000
    title
    Previously Treated (N=92)
  2. description
    100 mg BID N= 13 + 200 mg QD N=1
    id
    OG001
    title
    Treatment Naive (N=14)
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
In the original protocol, previously treated subjects were planned to be randomized 1:1 into 2 cohorts: Cohort 1 to receive Acala 100 mg BID for 28 days and Cohort 2 to receive Acala 200 mg once daily (QD) for 28 days. After enrollment started, the dose regimen was amended. The 200 mg QD dose was eliminated, and subjects who were enrolled under the original protocol and received treatment with 200 mg QD were switched to 100 mg BID. Results are combined.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Primary analysis occur when all subjects have completed Cycle 27 or have discontinued before Cycle 27.
title
Overall Survival (OS) of Acalabrutinib by Investigator
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Percentage of subjects

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice