Phase 2:Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score at Specified Timepoints
A Study of TAS-120 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors · Source last updated 2025-03-27
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
score on scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
Baseline, Cycle 2, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40 and end of treatment (i.e., Cycle 43 [30 months])
What was measured
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument that contains 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy \& assessment of participant reported outcome. EORTC QLQ-C30 included global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 are 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale \& are 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). GHS total score is calculated as (\[{Q29+Q30}/2\]-1)/6\*100. Answers are converted into grading scale, with values between 0 (worse outcome) to100 (best outcome). High score represents a favorable outcome with best quality of life for participant.
Analysis population: Analysis was performed on PRO population. Here, 'number analyzed' = number of participants with available data for each specified category.
Groups in this outcome
Phase 2
Participants with iCCA with tumors harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements received TAS-120 20 mg tablets orally QD in each of 21-day treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
92
Reported measurements
Baseline
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
91
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
70.1
19.41
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 2
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
83
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
-1.0
22.02
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 4
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
79
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
0.4
20.62
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 7
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
65
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
-0.5
21.64
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 10
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
58
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
1.9
22.84
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 13
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
48
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
0.9
21.49
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 16
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
27
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
2.5
18.61
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 19
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
15
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
-1.7
17.31
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 22
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
11
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
-8.3
22.05
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 25
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
7
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
-4.8
21.44
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 28
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
4
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
-6.3
12.50
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 31
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
1
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
41.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Cycle 34
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
1
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
41.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2
30
Values in score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2
-7.5
23.30
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
19.41
value
70.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
91
units
Participants
title
Baseline
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
22.02
value
-1.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
83
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 2
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
20.62
value
0.4
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
79
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 4
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
21.64
value
-0.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
65
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 7
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
22.84
value
1.9
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
58
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 10
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
21.49
value
0.9
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
48
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 13
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.61
value
2.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
27
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 16
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.31
value
-1.7
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
15
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 19
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
22.05
value
-8.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
11
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 22
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
21.44
value
-4.8
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
7
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 25
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
12.50
value
-6.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
4
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 28
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
41.7
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
1
units
Participants
title
Change at Cycle 31
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
92
units
Participants
description
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument that contains 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy \& assessment of participant reported outcome. EORTC QLQ-C30 included global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 are 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale \& are 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). GHS total score is calculated as (\[{Q29+Q30}/2\]-1)/6\*100. Answers are converted into grading scale, with values between 0 (worse outcome) to100 (best outcome). High score represents a favorable outcome with best quality of life for participant.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Participants with iCCA with tumors harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements received TAS-120 20 mg tablets orally QD in each of 21-day treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death.
id
OG000
title
Phase 2
param Type
MEAN
population Description
Analysis was performed on PRO population. Here, 'number analyzed' = number of participants with available data for each specified category.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline, Cycle 2, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40 and end of treatment (i.e., Cycle 43 [30 months])
title
Phase 2:Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score at Specified Timepoints