NCT02038036 · OUTCOME
Summary of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover
Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy. · Source last updated 2021-07-20
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
- Unit
- Participants
- Interval / dispersion
- Not reported
- Time frame
- Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, and 52 after cross-over
What was measured
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is comprised of a single question intended to measure a patient's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where one (1) equals very much improved and seven (7) equals very much worse.
Analysis population: Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib.
Groups in this outcome
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
Participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 58 |
|---|
Reported measurements
Week +4
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 52 |
|---|
Very much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 10 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 13 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 13 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
No change
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 16 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Week +8
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 53 |
|---|
Very much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 11 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 25 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
No change
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Week +16
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 52 |
|---|
Very much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 12 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 28 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
No change
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Week +24
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 50 |
|---|
Very much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 19 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 17 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 5 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
No change
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Week +28
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 50 |
|---|
Very much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 18 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 19 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
No change
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Week +40
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 44 |
|---|
Very much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 18 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 15 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 5 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
No change
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Week +52
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 42 |
|---|
Very much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 17 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 16 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally improved
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
No change
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Minimally worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Much worse
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | 0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- title
- Very much improved
- title
- Much improved
- title
- Minimally improved
- title
- No change
- title
- Minimally worse
- title
- Much worse
- title
- Week +4
- categories
- title
- Very much improved
- title
- Much improved
- title
- Minimally improved
- title
- No change
- title
- Minimally worse
- title
- Much worse
- title
- Week +8
- categories
- title
- Very much improved
- title
- Much improved
- title
- Minimally improved
- title
- No change
- title
- Minimally worse
- title
- Much worse
- title
- Week +16
- categories
- title
- Very much improved
- title
- Much improved
- title
- Minimally improved
- title
- No change
- title
- Minimally worse
- title
- Much worse
- title
- Week +24
- categories
- title
- Very much improved
- title
- Much improved
- title
- Minimally improved
- title
- No change
- title
- Minimally worse
- title
- Much worse
- title
- Week +28
- categories
- title
- Very much improved
- title
- Much improved
- title
- Minimally improved
- title
- No change
- title
- Minimally worse
- title
- Much worse
- title
- Week +40
- categories
- title
- Very much improved
- title
- Much improved
- title
- Minimally improved
- title
- No change
- title
- Minimally worse
- title
- Much worse
- title
- Week +52
- description
- The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is comprised of a single question intended to measure a patient's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where one (1) equals very much improved and seven (7) equals very much worse.
- groups
- description
- Participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib
- id
- OG000
- title
- Best Available Therapy (BAT)
- param Type
- COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
- population Description
- Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, and 52 after cross-over
- title
- Summary of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Participants
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice