Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS, by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover
Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy. · Source last updated 2021-07-20
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
Score on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over
What was measured
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine.
Analysis population: Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib.
Groups in this outcome
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
Participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
58
Reported measurements
Week +4
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
52
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
4.54
14.756
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +8
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
52
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
4.62
15.807
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +16
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
52
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
6.58
14.667
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +24
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
50
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
6.38
17.564
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +28
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
50
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
5.26
15.923
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +52
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
41
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
4.71
21.006
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 92
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
45
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
8.09
16.119
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 104
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
50
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
6.48
18.085
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 117
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
49
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
4.92
16.983
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 130
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
46
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
4.87
20.047
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 143
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
47
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
3.19
17.798
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 156
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
46
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
2.65
20.221
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 169
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
41
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
4.59
13.731
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 182
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
42
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
2.71
19.673
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 195
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
40
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
5.65
18.286
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 208
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
40
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
5.35
18.099
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 221
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
38
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
7.71
16.701
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 234
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
37
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
5.30
18.342
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 247
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
36
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
4.14
16.427
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.756
value
4.54
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
52
units
Participants
title
Week +4
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.807
value
4.62
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
52
units
Participants
title
Week +8
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.667
value
6.58
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
52
units
Participants
title
Week +16
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.564
value
6.38
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
50
units
Participants
title
Week +24
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.923
value
5.26
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
50
units
Participants
title
Week +28
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
21.006
value
4.71
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
41
units
Participants
title
Week +52
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.119
value
8.09
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
45
units
Participants
title
Week 92
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.085
value
6.48
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
50
units
Participants
title
Week 104
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.983
value
4.92
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
49
units
Participants
title
Week 117
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
20.047
value
4.87
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
46
units
Participants
title
Week 130
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.798
value
3.19
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
47
units
Participants
title
Week 143
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
20.221
value
2.65
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
46
units
Participants
title
Week 156
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
58
units
Participants
description
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib
id
OG000
title
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
param Type
MEAN
population Description
Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over
title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS, by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover