Change From Baseline in Score as Per European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy. · Source last updated 2021-07-20
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine.
Analysis population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure.
Groups in this outcome
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
74
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
75
Reported measurements
Week 4
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
67
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
69
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
4.24
11.661
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0.04
18.323
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 8
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
66
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
67
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
7.62
14.846
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-2.73
16.097
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 16
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
63
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
65
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
6.35
17.946
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-3.12
14.435
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 28
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
63
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
25
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
7.56
14.309
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0.16
15.201
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 52
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
66
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
14
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
7.36
13.996
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
2.50
10.697
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 80
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
64
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
4.50
18.273
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 92
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
62
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
6.77
18.948
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 104
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
64
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
6.25
18.143
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 117
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
62
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
6.42
15.130
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 130
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
61
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
7.70
16.488
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 143
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
59
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
5.68
17.332
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 156
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
62
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
4.74
19.032
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 169
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
61
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
6.08
18.717
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 182
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
60
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
7.68
17.992
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 195
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
59
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
6.41
18.239
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 208
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
53
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
7.94
18.614
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 221
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
53
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
3.64
19.866
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 234
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
54
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
5.48
18.625
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 247
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
50
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
6.28
17.854
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
11.661
value
4.24
group Id
OG001
spread
18.323
value
0.04
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
67
group Id
OG001
value
69
units
Participants
title
Week 4
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.846
value
7.62
group Id
OG001
spread
16.097
value
-2.73
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
66
group Id
OG001
value
67
units
Participants
title
Week 8
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.946
value
6.35
group Id
OG001
spread
14.435
value
-3.12
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
63
group Id
OG001
value
65
units
Participants
title
Week 16
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.309
value
7.56
group Id
OG001
spread
15.201
value
0.16
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
63
group Id
OG001
value
25
units
Participants
title
Week 28
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
13.996
value
7.36
group Id
OG001
spread
10.697
value
2.50
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
66
group Id
OG001
value
14
units
Participants
title
Week 52
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.273
value
4.50
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 80
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.948
value
6.77
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
62
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 92
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.143
value
6.25
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 104
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.130
value
6.42
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
62
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 117
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.488
value
7.70
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
61
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 130
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.332
value
5.68
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
59
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 143
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
19.032
value
4.74
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
62
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 156
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
74
group Id
OG001
value
75
units
Participants
description
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It consists of visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) which records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ VAS scores were anchored on 100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = worst health you can imagine.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid
id
OG000
title
Ruxolitinib
description
Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib
id
OG001
title
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
param Type
MEAN
population Description
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure.