Change From Baseline in Total Scores of MPN-SAF by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover
Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy. · Source last updated 2021-07-20
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
Score on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over
What was measured
The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement.
Analysis population: Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib.
Groups in this outcome
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
Participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
58
Reported measurements
Week +4
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
52
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-8.00
10.532
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +8
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
53
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-9.76
11.543
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +16
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
52
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-9.40
12.040
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +24
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
51
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-9.15
12.738
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +28
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
50
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-8.46
12.212
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +40
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
46
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-8.58
13.302
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week +52
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
42
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-7.15
14.392
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 92
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
45
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-10.49
13.902
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 104
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
51
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-8.08
16.288
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 117
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
49
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-9.01
14.708
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 130
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
46
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-10.18
15.740
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 143
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
47
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-8.36
17.030
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 156
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
45
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-9.54
14.573
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 169
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
42
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-11.15
14.305
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 182
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
43
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-10.13
16.113
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 195
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
41
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-10.88
14.357
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 208
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
40
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-9.43
15.360
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 221
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
38
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-10.02
15.986
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 234
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
36
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-8.01
14.404
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 247
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
37
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
-9.84
14.979
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
10.532
value
-8.00
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
52
units
Participants
title
Week +4
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
11.543
value
-9.76
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
53
units
Participants
title
Week +8
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
12.040
value
-9.40
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
52
units
Participants
title
Week +16
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
12.738
value
-9.15
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
51
units
Participants
title
Week +24
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
12.212
value
-8.46
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
50
units
Participants
title
Week +28
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
13.302
value
-8.58
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
46
units
Participants
title
Week +40
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.392
value
-7.15
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
42
units
Participants
title
Week +52
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
13.902
value
-10.49
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
45
units
Participants
title
Week 92
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.288
value
-8.08
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
51
units
Participants
title
Week 104
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.708
value
-9.01
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
49
units
Participants
title
Week 117
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.740
value
-10.18
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
46
units
Participants
title
Week 130
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.030
value
-8.36
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
47
units
Participants
title
Week 143
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
58
units
Participants
description
The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib
id
OG000
title
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
param Type
MEAN
population Description
Cross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 40, 52, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234 and 247 after cross-over
title
Change From Baseline in Total Scores of MPN-SAF by Visit in Patients From BAT Group Who Cross Over to Ruxolitinib After Crossover