Change From Baseline in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS)
Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy. · Source last updated 2021-07-20
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement.
Analysis population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure.
Groups in this outcome
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
74
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
75
Reported measurements
Week 4
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
68
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
70
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-8.43
12.341
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0.40
12.586
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 8
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
68
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
69
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-9.86
12.210
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
1.37
12.046
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 16
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
67
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
67
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-9.14
13.980
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
1.41
10.760
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 28
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
65
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
23
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-10.29
14.204
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
2.34
13.047
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 40
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
67
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
18
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-9.35
14.027
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0.10
9.586
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 52
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
70
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
13
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-8.63
13.403
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0.63
9.334
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 80
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
67
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-9.04
13.520
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 92
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
64
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-7.69
11.971
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 104
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
68
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-6.82
13.297
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 117
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
64
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-6.76
13.702
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 130
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
64
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-8.26
16.234
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 143
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
64
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-8.56
15.653
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 156
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
65
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-8.48
15.081
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 169
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
64
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-7.65
14.392
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 182
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
63
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-9.34
14.675
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 195
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
61
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-7.57
14.922
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 208
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
55
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-9.26
16.347
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 221
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
55
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-7.20
16.054
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 234
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
57
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-7.50
15.922
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Week 247
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
51
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
-7.82
16.905
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
12.341
value
-8.43
group Id
OG001
spread
12.586
value
0.40
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
68
group Id
OG001
value
70
units
Participants
title
Week 4
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
12.210
value
-9.86
group Id
OG001
spread
12.046
value
1.37
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
68
group Id
OG001
value
69
units
Participants
title
Week 8
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
13.980
value
-9.14
group Id
OG001
spread
10.760
value
1.41
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
67
group Id
OG001
value
67
units
Participants
title
Week 16
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.204
value
-10.29
group Id
OG001
spread
13.047
value
2.34
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
65
group Id
OG001
value
23
units
Participants
title
Week 28
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.027
value
-9.35
group Id
OG001
spread
9.586
value
0.10
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
67
group Id
OG001
value
18
units
Participants
title
Week 40
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
13.403
value
-8.63
group Id
OG001
spread
9.334
value
0.63
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
70
group Id
OG001
value
13
units
Participants
title
Week 52
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
13.520
value
-9.04
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
67
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 80
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
11.971
value
-7.69
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 92
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
13.297
value
-6.82
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
68
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 104
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
13.702
value
-6.76
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 117
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.234
value
-8.26
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 130
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.653
value
-8.56
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
64
group Id
OG001
value
0
units
Participants
title
Week 143
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
74
group Id
OG001
value
75
units
Participants
description
The MPN-SAF TSS is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 10 items that measures fatigue related to MPN disease and the severity of nine of the most prevalent associated symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue/absent) to 10 (As bad as you can imagine/worst imaginable).The MPN-SAF TSS is computed as the average of the observed items multiplied by 10 to achieve a 0-to-100 scale. The MPN-SAF TSS thus has a possible score range of 0 to 100 where a decrease indicates improvement.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day (bid). Dose was adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters up to a maximum dose of 25 mg bid
id
OG000
title
Ruxolitinib
description
Best Available Therapy as selected by the investigator from: Hydroxyurea, Pegylated-Interferon (IFN/PEG-IFN), pipobroman, anagrelide, IMIDs, or observation. Participants randomized to BAT who did not respond by Week 28 were eligible to crossover and start treatment with ruxolitinib
id
OG001
title
Best Available Therapy (BAT)
param Type
MEAN
population Description
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure.