Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02003924 · OUTCOME

Overall Survival

Safety and Efficacy Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer · Source last updated 2026-01-27

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From randomization until death (up to a maximum of 68.8 months)

What was measured

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death from any cause. For participants who were alive at the time of the analysis data cutoff, OS time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive or analysis data cutoff date, whichever was earlier. Participants with no post baseline survival information were censored on the date of randomization. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Analysis population: The ITT population was defined as all participants randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.

Groups in this outcome

Enzalutamide 160 mg

Participants received 4 capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose 160 mg per day) orally, once daily in double-blind and open-label phase (up to a maximum of 68.8 months) until radiographic progression. Participants after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days, and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) from last dose to the death date or last known survival date.

Placebo

Participants received 4 capsules of placebo (matched to Enzalutamide) orally, once daily in double blind phase (up to a maximum of 51.3 months) until radiographic progression. Participants were given an opportunity to switch to open-label enzalutamide after completion of double blind phase. Participants after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) to the death date or last known survival date.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Enzalutamide 160 mg933
Placebo468

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Enzalutamide 160 mg67.0Not reported64.0NALower limit for 95% CI could not be estimated because there were insufficient number of participants with event.
Placebo56.3Not reported54.463.0Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.608
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.885
    estimate Comment
    HR was based on a Cox regression model (with treatment as the only covariate) stratified by factors defined above, and was relative to placebo with \< 1 favoring Enzalutamide.
    group Description
    To maintain family-wise 2-sided type I error rate at 0.05,parallel testing strategy between OS(with allocated type I error rate 0.03)and remaining key secondary endpoints(time to PSA progression and time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy with allocated type I error rate 0.02)was performed.OS tested at error rate 0.05 when both time to PSA progression and time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy were significant. When either failed to show significance.OS was tested at error 0.03.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0011
    p Value Comment
    P-value was based on a stratified log-rank test by PSA doubling time (\< 6 months, \>= 6 months) and prior or concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per interactive voice/web recognition system (IXRS).
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.734
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.608
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.885
    estimate Comment
    HR was based on a Cox regression model (with treatment as the only covariate) stratified by factors defined above, and was relative to placebo with \< 1 favoring Enzalutamide.
    group Description
    To maintain family-wise 2-sided type I error rate at 0.05,parallel testing strategy between OS(with allocated type I error rate 0.03)and remaining key secondary endpoints(time to PSA progression and time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy with allocated type I error rate 0.02)was performed.OS tested at error rate 0.05 when both time to PSA progression and time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy were significant. When either failed to show significance.OS was tested at error 0.03.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0011
    p Value Comment
    P-value was based on a stratified log-rank test by PSA doubling time (\< 6 months, \>= 6 months) and prior or concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per interactive voice/web recognition system (IXRS).
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.734
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        Lower limit for 95% CI could not be estimated because there were insufficient number of participants with event.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        64.0
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        67.0
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        54.4
        upper Limit
        63.0
        value
        56.3
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      933
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      468
    units
    Participants
description
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death from any cause. For participants who were alive at the time of the analysis data cutoff, OS time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive or analysis data cutoff date, whichever was earlier. Participants with no post baseline survival information were censored on the date of randomization. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received 4 capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose 160 mg per day) orally, once daily in double-blind and open-label phase (up to a maximum of 68.8 months) until radiographic progression. Participants after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days, and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) from last dose to the death date or last known survival date.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg
  2. description
    Participants received 4 capsules of placebo (matched to Enzalutamide) orally, once daily in double blind phase (up to a maximum of 51.3 months) until radiographic progression. Participants were given an opportunity to switch to open-label enzalutamide after completion of double blind phase. Participants after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) to the death date or last known survival date.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Placebo
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
The ITT population was defined as all participants randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From randomization until death (up to a maximum of 68.8 months)
title
Overall Survival
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice