Skip to content
← Study library

NCT01958021 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Study of Efficacy and Safety of LEE011 in Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2025-03-07

The primary purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ribociclib, as measured by progression free survival (PFS), in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer who received no prior treatment for advanced disease.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Women with advanced (locoregionally recurrent or metastatic) breast cancer that was not amenable to curative therapy. 2. The patient was postmenopausal. Postmenopausal status was defined either by: * Prior bilateral oophorectomy * Age ≥60 * Age \<60 and amenorrhea for 12 or more months (in the absence of chemotherapy, tamoxifen, toremifen, or ovarian suppression) and FSH and estradiol in the postmenopausal range per local normal range. 3. There was no prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced disease. 4. The patient had a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of estrogen-receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer by the local laboratory. 5. The patient had HER2-negative breast cancer defined as a negative in situ hybridization test or an IHC status of 0, 1+ or 2+. If IHC was 2+, a negative in situ hybridization (FISH, CISH, or SISH) test was required by local laboratory testing. 6. The patient must have had either: Measurable disease, i.e., at least one measurable lesion as per RECIST 1.1 criteria (Tumor lesions previously irradiated or subjected to other locoregional therapy were considered measurable if disease progression at the treated site after completion of therapy was clearly documented). OR If no measurable disease was present, then at least one predominantly lytic bone lesion must have been present (Patients with no measurable disease and only one predominantly lytic bone lesion previously irradiated were eligible if there was documented evidence of disease progression of the bone lesion after irradiation). 7. The patient had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Key Exclusion Criteria: 1. The patient had received any CDK4/6 inhibitor. 2. The patient had received any prior systemic anti-cancer therapy (including hormonal therapy and chemotherapy) for advanced breast cancer. Note: * Patients who had received (neo) adjuvant therapy for breast cancer were eligible. If the prior neo (adjuvant) therapy included letrozole or anastrozole, the disease-free interval had to be greater than 12 months from the completion of treatment until randomization. * Patients who had received ≤ 14 days of letrozole or anastrozole for advanced disease prior to randomization were eligible. * Any prior (neo) adjuvant anti-cancer therapy had to be stopped at least 5 half-lives or 7 days, whichever was longer, before randomization. 3. The patient was concurrently using other anti-cancer therapy. 4. The patient had a concurrent malignancy or malignancy within 3 years of randomization, with the exception of adequately treated, basal or squamous cell carcinoma, non-melanomatous skin cancer, or curatively resected cervical cancer. 5. The patient had active cardiac disease or a history of cardiac dysfunction, including any of the following: * History of angina pectoris, symptomatic pericarditis, or myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to study entry. * History of documented congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional classification III-IV). * Documented cardiomyopathy. * The patient had a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) \< 50% as determined by Multiple Gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram (ECHO). * History of any cardiac arrhythmias, e.g., ventricular, supraventricular, nodal arrhythmias, or conduction abnormality in the previous 12 months. * On screening, any of the following cardiac parameters: bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 at rest), tachycardia (heart rate \> 90 at rest), PR interval \> 220 msec, QRS interval \>109 msec, or QTcF \>450 msec. * Systolic blood pressure \>160 or \<90 mmHg. 6. The patient was currently receiving any of the following medications and could not be discontinued 7 days prior to the start of treatment: * Medications known to be strong inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4. * Medications known to have a risk of prolonging the QT interval or inducing Torsades de Pointes. * Medications with a narrow therapeutic window and predominantly metabolized through CYP3A4. * Herbal preparations/medications.
healthy Volunteers
false
maximum Age
100 Years
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
FEMALE
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Ribociclib 600 mg daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Ribociclib
    2. Drug: Letrozole
    label
    Ribociclib+ letrozole
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. description
    Placebo daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral. Participants were unblinded once the final OS analysis was completed and after the implementation of protocol amendment 10 (30-Apr-21) and were given the option to crossover to treatment with ribociclib + letrozole
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Letrozole
    2. Drug: Placebo
    label
    Placebo + letrozole
    type
    PLACEBO_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Ribociclib+ letrozole
    description
    Ribociclib (600 mg, in three 200 mg hard gelatin capsules or tablets) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
    name
    Ribociclib
    other Names
    1. LEE011
    type
    DRUG
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Placebo + letrozole
    2. Ribociclib+ letrozole
    description
    Letrozole (2.5 mg, tablets) was administered orally once daily on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle)
    name
    Letrozole
    type
    DRUG
  3. arm Group Labels
    1. Placebo + letrozole
    description
    Placebo (hard gelatin capsules or tablets) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
    name
    Placebo
    type
    DRUG
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
QUADRUPLE
who Masked
  1. PARTICIPANT
  2. CARE_PROVIDER
  3. INVESTIGATOR
  4. OUTCOMES_ASSESSOR
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
668
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    PFS was defined as the period starting from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death caused by any reason. In cases where patients did not experience an event, the PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Clinical deterioration without objective radiological evidence was not considered as documented disease progression.PFS was assessed by investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS, and the median PFS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. A stratified Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of PFS, along with 95% confidence interval
    measure
    Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment
    time Frame
    Up to 23 months
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. In cases where the patient's death was not recorded, the OS value was censored at the date of the last known patient's survival status.OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. As per protocol, the final OS analysis was conducted after approximately 400 deaths were documented. The median OS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group.The distribution of OS between the two treatment arms was compared using a log-rank test at one-sided cumulative 2.5% level of significance. A stratified Cox regression was used to estimate the OS hazard ratio and the associated 95% CI.
    measure
    Overall Survival (OS)
    time Frame
    Up to approximately 87 months
  2. description
    ORR is the percentage of participants with the best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 as per investigator assessment. . CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
    measure
    Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
    time Frame
    Up to 23 months
  3. description
    Percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) lasting 24 weeks or longer as defined in RECIST 1.1 as per investigator assessment. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease: PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20% the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
    measure
    Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment
    time Frame
    Up to 23 months
  4. description
    ECOG PS categorized patients based on their ability to perform daily activities and self-care, with scores ranging from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicated no restrictions in activity, while higher scores indicated increasing limitations. Time to definitive deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the event, defined as experiencing an increase in ECOG PS by at least one category from the baseline or death. A deterioration was considered definitive if no improvements in the ECOG PS were observed at a subsequent time. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution, and the median time to definitive deterioration, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. Patients receiving any further therapy prior to definitive worsening were censored at their date of last assessment prior to start of therapy. Patients that had not worsened at the data cutoff point were censored at the date of last assessment.
    measure
    Time to Definitive Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) by at Least One Category of the Score
    time Frame
    From baseline up to 23 months
  5. description
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that includes 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 1 GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items. GHS/QoL scale score ranges between 0 and 100. A high score for GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL.The time to definitive 10% deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which is defined as at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of the QoL score (without further improvement above the threshold) or death due to any cause. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution, and the median time to definitive 10% deterioration, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. If a patient had not had an event, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate QoL evaluation.
    measure
    Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
    time Frame
    From baseline up to 23 months
  6. description
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that includes 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 1 GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items. GHS/QoL scale score ranges between 0 and 100. A high score for GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL.The change from baseline in the GHS/QoL score was assesed. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement. For subjects who discontinued treatment earlier and without disease progression, post-treatment efficacy follow-up visits occurred every 8 weeks after End of treatment (EOT) during the initial 18 months since start of treatment, followed by visits every 12 weeks until disease progression or end of study.
    measure
    Change From Baseline in the GHS/QoL Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
    time Frame
    Baseline, every 2 cycles for 18 months, then every 3 cycles until last dose; at EOT (within 15 days from last dose);every 8 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), assessed up to 23 months. Cycle=28 days
Full study description
brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ribociclib, as measured by progression free survival (PFS), in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer who received no prior treatment for advanced disease.
detailed Description
This was an international, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled Phase III trial to determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received no prior therapy for advanced disease. Eligible patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to either ribociclib group or placebo group. Study treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation from the study treatment for any other reason. Participants who discontinued treatment due to reasons other than disease progression or withdrawal of consent for efficacy follow-up continued to be monitored until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or subject/guardian decision (post-treatment efficacy follow-up). All participants who discontinued treatment were followed for survival until the predetermined number of overall survival (OS) events was reached. Following the final OS analysis (performed when approximately 400 deaths were recorded) and with protocol amendment 10 (dated 30-Apr-2021), participants and investigators were unblinded and those participants in the placebo arm had the opportunity to cross-over to the ribociclib arm to receive ribociclib plus letrozole. Cross-over was optional and was conducted at the investigator's discretion and upon participant consent.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Ji Y, Wang C, Combes FP, Ho YY, Fasching PA, Untch M, Zarate JP, Crown J. Quantitative Pharmacology Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Early Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2026 Aug;65(8):1217-1228. doi: 10.1007/s40262-026-01643-3. Epub 2026 Jun 23.
    pmid
    42334791
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    Jhaveri K, O'Shaughnessy J, Fasching PA, Tolaney SM, Yardley DA, Sharma VK, Biswas C, Thuerigen A, Pathak P, Rugo HS. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of PFS and OS comparing ribociclib plus letrozole versus palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Dec 14;15:17588359231216095. doi: 10.1177/17588359231216095. eCollection 2023.
    pmid
    38107828
    type
    DERIVED
  3. citation
    Andre F, Su F, Solovieff N, Hortobagyi G, Chia S, Neven P, Bardia A, Tripathy D, Lu YS, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Slamon D, Arteaga CL. Pooled ctDNA analysis of MONALEESA phase III advanced breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol. 2023 Nov;34(11):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
    pmid
    37673211
    type
    DERIVED
  4. citation
    Rugo HS, Harmer V, O'Shaughnessy J, Jhaveri K, Tolaney SM, Cardoso F, Bardia A, Maheshwari VK, Tripathi S, Haftchenary S, Pathak P, Fasching PA. Quality of life with ribociclib versus abemaciclib as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Feb 24;15:17588359231152843. doi: 10.1177/17588359231152843. eCollection 2023.
    pmid
    36861085
    type
    DERIVED
  5. citation
    Ji Y, Yartsev V, Quinlan M, Serra P, Wang Y, Chakraborty A, Miller M. Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer with Renal Impairment Based on PK, Safety, and Efficacy Data: An Innovative Approach Integrating Data from a Dedicated Renal Impairment Study and Oncology Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Mar;62(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01206-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
    pmid
    36800111
    type
    DERIVED
  6. citation
    Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Hart L, Campone M, Petrakova K, Winer EP, Janni W, Conte P, Cameron DA, Andre F, Arteaga CL, Zarate JP, Chakravartty A, Taran T, Le Gac F, Serra P, O'Shaughnessy J. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 10;386(10):942-950. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114663.
    pmid
    35263519
    type
    DERIVED
  7. citation
    Burris HA, Chan A, Bardia A, Thaddeus Beck J, Sohn J, Neven P, Tripathy D, Im SA, Chia S, Esteva FJ, Hart L, Zarate JP, Ridolfi A, Lorenc KR, Yardley DA. Safety and impact of dose reductions on efficacy in the randomised MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7 trials in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(5):679-686. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01415-9. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
    pmid
    34158598
    type
    DERIVED
  8. citation
    Prat A, Chaudhury A, Solovieff N, Pare L, Martinez D, Chic N, Martinez-Saez O, Braso-Maristany F, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Su F. Correlative Biomarker Analysis of Intrinsic Subtypes and Efficacy Across the MONALEESA Phase III Studies. J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;39(13):1458-1467. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02977. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
    pmid
    33769862
    type
    DERIVED
  9. citation
    Yardley DA. MONALEESA clinical program: a review of ribociclib use in different clinical settings. Future Oncol. 2019 Aug;15(23):2673-2686. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0130. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
    pmid
    31305131
    type
    DERIVED
  10. citation
    Hortobagyi GN. Ribociclib for the first-line treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a review of subgroup analyses from the MONALEESA-2 trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 19;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1050-7.
    pmid
    30340505
    type
    DERIVED
  11. citation
    Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Petrakova K, Blackwell KL, Winer EP, Janni W, Verma S, Conte P, Arteaga CL, Cameron DA, Mondal S, Su F, Miller M, Elmeliegy M, Germa C, O'Shaughnessy J. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1541-1547. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy155.
    pmid
    29718092
    type
    DERIVED
  12. citation
    Janni W, Alba E, Bachelot T, Diab S, Gil-Gil M, Beck TJ, Ryvo L, Lopez R, Tsai M, Esteva FJ, Aunon PZ, Kral Z, Ward P, Richards P, Pluard TJ, Sutradhar S, Miller M, Campone M. First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(3):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4658-x. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
    pmid
    29404806
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-0911d293c9073877fe5c
      requested nct id
      NCT01958021
      primary nct id
      NCT01958021
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      862f78faa9e4cbedc19f9ffcaeba97e029ba51b72bb3b81fc67aa8b6adf96904
      payload sha256
      c1a0d79c8e0627c93bb52d5a57146e4343c2312139af674159b5751e23dcea20
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-0911d293c9073877fe5c
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT01958021
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        ine ribociclib and endocrine therapy):</p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_2096"><li>The phase III placebo-controlled <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01958021">MONALEESA-2</a> trial (NCT01958021) randomly assigned 668 patients to receive either first-line ribociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole.[<a href="
        end
        553768
        exact text
        NCT01958021
        start
        553757
      2. context exact
        ):</p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_2096"><li>The phase III placebo-controlled <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01958021">MONALEESA-2</a> trial (NCT01958021) randomly assigned 668 patients to receive either first-line ribociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole.[<a href="#cit/section_10.12">12</a>,<a href="
        end
        553804
        exact text
        NCT01958021
        start
        553793
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/29bf1e5a1d739974ed.html
      source file sha256
      862f78faa9e4cbedc19f9ffcaeba97e029ba51b72bb3b81fc67aa8b6adf96904
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:21:35.419733+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      536430925e3b0008edd3fb69a869d5645bd6b6dc5c84c21ddf1b3e24f089874c
      source title
      Breast Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: April 25, 2025
        datetime
        2025-04-25T12:00:00Z
        display
        April 25, 2025
    2. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-0cf767945e3ccc8c1204
      requested nct id
      NCT01958021
      primary nct id
      NCT01958021
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=500&sort=id%3Aasc
      source record id
      9466e642-f230-43f3-b78e-5a432fa040ee
      source file sha256
      424ccf5bc67db0a96ee2c35ed913dd5894642716182773d81ca19cdfb9ba32f3
      payload sha256
      a60cb83d43f8b280f31818cbebacebe573044182b1774bc8517b66daf3e59390
      payload
      application numbers
      1. NDA209092
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-0cf767945e3ccc8c1204
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT01958021
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        ation with Letrozole Postmenopausal Women with HR-positive, HER2-negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer for Initial Endocrine-Based Therapy MONALEESA-2 (NCT01958021) was a randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical study of KISQALI plus letrozole vs. placebo plus letrozole conducted in postmen
        end
        3776
        exact text
        NCT01958021
        start
        3765
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/indications/raw/labels-00500.json
      source file sha256
      424ccf5bc67db0a96ee2c35ed913dd5894642716182773d81ca19cdfb9ba32f3
      source json pointer
      /results/45/clinical_studies/0
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source record id
      9466e642-f230-43f3-b78e-5a432fa040ee
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      89e16f929b50c1b2c4abdded61afd10efb2da3e0cfec38741753cb8224e3b146
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=500&sort=id%3Aasc
      spl effective time
      20260701
      spl set id
      aaeaef94-f3f5-4367-8ea2-b181d7be2da8

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice