NCT01951885 · REGISTRY CONDITION SEARCH
Tac, Mini-MTX, MMF Versus Tac, MTX for GVHD Prevention
Found through the registry condition index, not selected as a treatment recommendation. This discovery collection was restricted to studies with posted results.
- Phase
- PHASE3
- Status at capture
- COMPLETED
- Registry last update
- 2023-09-11
This randomized clinical trial studies standard GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate compared to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and a reduced-dose methotrexate in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Both mycophenolate mofetil and reduced-dose methotrexate, in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, have been shown to be safe and effective in GVHD prevention with less toxicity than standard dose methotrexate. It is not yet known, however, whether this combination of mycophenolate mofetil and reduced-dose methotrexate with tacrolimus is more effective than tacrolimus and standard dose methotrexate in preventing GVHD.
Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record
What did the study report?
Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.
Participant flow
Baseline characteristics
Percentage of Severe (Grade 3-4) Mucositis Graded According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading Scale
Time to Neutrophil Engraftment
Time to Platelet Engraftment
Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Acute GVHD
Length of Hospitalization
Percentage of Participants Using Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Within 100 Days
Overall Survival
Progression-free Survival
Incidence of Chronic GVHD
Incidence of Chronic GVHD
Length of Time on Continuous Infusion Narcotics
Incidence of Infection
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Bilirubin
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Elevated Liver Enzymes
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)
Incidence of Nephrotoxicity
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Hemorrhage
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Edema
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Respiratory Failure
Chimerism Results
Adverse events
Limitations, agreements, and source contact
Who could take part
- eligibility Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria: * Patients must have one of the following documented diseases: * Chronic myelogenous leukemia * Chronic lymphocytic leukemia * Multiple myeloma * Myelodysplasia * Myeloproliferative disorder * Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma * Hodgkin's disease * Acute myelogenous leukemia * Acute lymphoblastic leukemia * Acute biphenotypic leukemia * Patients must be undergoing a myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant with one of the following conditioning regimens: * Busulfan (≥ 12.8 mg/kg IV or PO) and cyclophosphamide (≥ 120 mg/kg) \--- Busulfan dose may be adjusted according to pharmacokinetics targeting a daily AUC of 5000 μmol-min/L, per institution standard of practice. * Total body irradiation (TBI) (≥ 1200 cGy) and etoposide (60 mg/kg) * TBI (≥ 1200 cGy) and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) * Patient must have achieved and be in complete morphologic remission prior to starting conditioning regimen * Patient's donor must be a related or unrelated human leukocyte antigen (HLA) 8/8 allele-level match (HLA-A, B, C and DRB1) * Adult patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1; pediatric patients must have Lansky score ≥ 60% * Patients must have a life expectancy of 100 days * Patients must sign written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who have undergone any prior transplant * Patients who are seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Patients with any medical illness or concurrent psychiatric illness which, in the investigators' opinion, cannot be adequately controlled with appropriate therapy * Patients who are pregnant or lactating
- healthy Volunteers
- false
- maximum Age
- 70 Years
- sex
- ALL
- std Ages
- CHILD
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
- arm Groups
- description
- Participants receive tacrolimus IV over 24 hours beginning on day -1 (or tacrolimus orally beginning on day -3) and then PO BID after engraftment with a taper from day 100 to day 180 (in the absence of GVHD). Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11.
- intervention Names
- Drug: tacrolimus
- Drug: methotrexate
- label
- Group A (tacrolimus, methotrexate)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- description
- Patients receive tacrolimus as in group A and methotrexate (low dose) IV on days 1, 3, and 6. Patients also receive oral mycophenolate mofetil BID beginning on day 1, with a taper from day 45 to day 100 (in the absence of GVHD).
- intervention Names
- Drug: tacrolimus
- Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil
- Drug: Methotrexate (low dose)
- label
- Group B (tacrolimus, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- interventions
- arm Group Labels
- Group A (tacrolimus, methotrexate)
- Group B (tacrolimus, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil)
- description
- Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day beginning day -1 or tacrolimus 0.03mg/kg/dose BID orally beginning on day -3. If Tac is administered intravenously, it will be given over 24 hours and will be converted to oral administration 2 times a day when the patient has engrafted and/or can tolerate oral medication. Levels of Tac will be obtained to maintain a recommended target serum level of 5-12 ng/mL
- name
- tacrolimus
- other Names
- FK 506
- Prograf
- type
- DRUG
- arm Group Labels
- Group A (tacrolimus, methotrexate)
- description
- MTX 15mg/m2 IV on day +1, followed by 10mg/m2 on day +3, +6, +11. If patient \< 10 kg then MTX will be given at 0.5 mg/kg IV on day +1. Then MTX will be given at 0.33 mg/kg on days +3, +6 and +11.
- name
- methotrexate
- other Names
- amethopterin
- Folex
- methylaminopterin
- Mexate
- MTX
- type
- DRUG
- arm Group Labels
- Group B (tacrolimus, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil)
- description
- Patients will receive Mycophenolate beginning on day +1. Patients \>40 kg will receive Mycophenolate 1000 mg twice a day. Mycophenolate should be given orally twice a day. IV formulation may be used if the patient cannot tolerate oral route. Patients \< 40 kg will receive MMF 45 mg/kg/day (15 mg/kg three times a day). MMF may be given orally or intravenously as per institutional protocol
- name
- Mycophenolate mofetil
- other Names
- Cellcept
- MMF
- type
- DRUG
- arm Group Labels
- Group B (tacrolimus, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil)
- description
- MTX 5mg/m2 IV on day +1, +3, +6. If patient\<10 kg MTX will be given at 0.17 mg/kg on day +1, +3, and +6.
- name
- Methotrexate (low dose)
- other Names
- amethopterin
- Folex
- methylaminopterin
- Mexate
- MTX
- type
- DRUG
Study design
- allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- masking Info
- masking
- NONE
- primary Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Enrollment
- count
- 101
- type
- ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
- other Outcomes
- description
- Donor chimerism will be assessed by analysis of single-tandem repeats on whole marrow and in lymphocyte enriched or sorted CD3+ T cells and CD33+ granulocytes. Blood will be obtained for donor chimerism "Bone Marrow Engraftment analysis" at approximately 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months or as clinically indicated.
- measure
- Chimerism Results
- time Frame
- Up to one year
- primary Outcomes
- description
- Participants (percentage of) will be graded three times per week through day 28 of the study. Incidence will be compared through Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The WHO grading scale for mucositis is scaled depending on the severity of mucositis symptoms, with a lower stage associated with a better outcome and greater stages associated with worse outcomes. The staging is as follows: Stage 0: None Stage 1 (mild): Oral soreness, erythema Stage 2 (moderate): Oral erythema, ulcers, solid diet tolerated Stage 3 (severe): Oral ulcers, liquid diet only Stage 4 (life-threatening): Oral alimentation impossible
- measure
- Percentage of Severe (Grade 3-4) Mucositis Graded According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading Scale
- time Frame
- Up to day 28
- description
- The number of days to reach a neutrophil count of greater than or equal to 500/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values.
- measure
- Time to Neutrophil Engraftment
- time Frame
- Up to 28 days
- description
- The number of days to reach a platelet count of greater than or equal to 20,000/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days, independent of platelet transfusions the prior 7 days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values. For cases of delayed engraftment beyond 28 days, results will be recorded once the participant engrafts.
- measure
- Time to Platelet Engraftment
- time Frame
- The date the participant engrafts, up to 28 days
- description
- Acute GVHD by grade will be estimated using cumulative incidence methods and compared using the Gray test. A lower clinical grade and/or stage of GVHD corresponds to a better participant outcome and a higher grade corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Grade 0: No stage 1-4 of any organ Grade 1: Stage 1-2 skin without liver, upper GI, or lower GI involvement. Grade 2: Stage 3 rash and/or stage 1 liver and/or stage 1 upper GI and/or stage 1 lower GI. Grade 3: Stage 2-3 liver and/or stage 2-3 lower GI, with stage 0-3 skin and/or stage 0-1 upper GI. Grade 4: Stage 4 skin, liver, or lower GI involvement, with stage 0-1 upper GI. A greater stage of GVHD involves worsening end-organ involvement and worse participant outcomes based on the skin, liver, lower GI, and upper GI.
- measure
- Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Acute GVHD
- time Frame
- Day 7- Day 100
- secondary Outcomes
- description
- Hospital stay will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
- measure
- Length of Hospitalization
- time Frame
- Date of transplant to date of discharge, assessed up to 1 year
- description
- TPN use will be compared using the Chi-square test.
- measure
- Percentage of Participants Using Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Within 100 Days
- time Frame
- Up to day 100
- description
- Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test.
- measure
- Overall Survival
- time Frame
- Up to 1 year
- description
- Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test.
- measure
- Progression-free Survival
- time Frame
- Up to 1 year
- description
- Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0 Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1 Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3 Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes. Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract
- measure
- Incidence of Chronic GVHD
- time Frame
- at 6 months
- description
- Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0 Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1 Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3 Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes. Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract
- measure
- Incidence of Chronic GVHD
- time Frame
- at 12 months
- description
- Start and stop dates for the need of continuous IV infusion of narcotics for severe mucositis pain will be recorded. Time on IV infusion will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
- measure
- Length of Time on Continuous Infusion Narcotics
- time Frame
- up to +28 day
- description
- 100-day incidence of infection will be compared using a the Gray test.
- measure
- Incidence of Infection
- time Frame
- Up to day +100
- description
- 100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Median and range of largest total bilirubin (mg/dL),
- measure
- Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Bilirubin
- time Frame
- Up to day +100
- description
- 100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Percentage of patients with elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase and a 95% confidence interval
- measure
- Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Elevated Liver Enzymes
- time Frame
- Up to day +100
- description
- 100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with VOD and 95% confidence interval
- measure
- Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)
- time Frame
- Up to day +100
- description
- 100-day incidence of nephrotoxicity will be compared using a Chi-squared test. Percentage of patients requiring dialysis and those with elevated creatinine using a 95% confidence interval
- measure
- Incidence of Nephrotoxicity
- time Frame
- Up to day +100
Full study description
- brief Summary
- This randomized clinical trial studies standard GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate compared to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and a reduced-dose methotrexate in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Both mycophenolate mofetil and reduced-dose methotrexate, in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, have been shown to be safe and effective in GVHD prevention with less toxicity than standard dose methotrexate. It is not yet known, however, whether this combination of mycophenolate mofetil and reduced-dose methotrexate with tacrolimus is more effective than tacrolimus and standard dose methotrexate in preventing GVHD.
- detailed Description
- Study Design This is a prospective randomized trial to determine the effectiveness of different doses of GVHD prophylaxis on mucositis, engraftment and aGVHD. Study consists of two study groups of 50 subjects each. Group A will receive Tac and MTX (15 mg/m2 day +1, 10 mg/m2 day +3, +6, +11). Group B will receive Tac, Mini-dose MTX (5 mg/m2 on day +1, +3, +6) and MMF.
Source references
- references
- citation
- Hamilton BK, Rybicki LA, Li H, Lucas T, Corrigan D, Kalaycio M, Sobecks R, Hanna R, Rotz SJ, Dean RM, Gerds AT, Jagadeesh D, Brunstein C, Sauter CS, Copelan EA, Majhail NS. Tacrolimus/methotrexate vs tacrolimus/reduced-dose methotrexate/mycophenolate for graft-versus-host disease prevention. Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 22;7(16):4505-4513. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010310.
- pmid
- 37352262
- type
- DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
Discovery and provenance
- release id
- ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
- edge id
- nct-edge-23676e5a4675736ff4b4
- requested nct id
- NCT01951885
- primary nct id
- NCT01951885
- source kind
- ctgov_condition_query
- source record id
- Source null
- source file sha256
- f61b5b8281f834a98709317598003056a2aa82c9b92a292e3623f400c9c3291b
- payload sha256
- 75ae5f4dfc0a3a224285cb3af118b9d2467fb88e7c6c934e3c27073f477e3dff
- payload
- clinical indication matching status
- condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-23676e5a4675736ff4b4
- link basis
- returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
- nct id
- NCT01951885
- occurrences
- context exact
- NCT01951885
- end
- 11
- exact text
- NCT01951885
- start
- 0
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- query cond
- Plasma Cell Neoplasms
- query disease state id
- ds-plasma-cell-neoplasms
- source file
- /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-plasma-cell-neoplasms-001.json
- source file sha256
- f61b5b8281f834a98709317598003056a2aa82c9b92a292e3623f400c9c3291b
- source json pointer
- /studies/22/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
- source kind
- ctgov_condition_query
- source record id
- Source null
- source string basis
- parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
- source string sha256
- 52622ee163f38744051edf23c9a5ac8fdd0817ea8bde7ca6e52dc56760cd6a62
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle