Skip to content
← Study library

NCT01849874 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

A Study of MEK162 vs. Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With Low-grade Serous Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Peritoneal Cancer

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
TERMINATED
Registry last update
2023-10-30

The MILO Study (MEK Inhibitor in Low-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer) is a Phase 3 study during which patients with recurrent or persistent low-grade serous (LGS) carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube or primary peritoneum will receive either investigational study drug MEK162 or a chemotherapy chosen by the physician (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel or topotecan). Patients will be followed to compare the effectiveness of the study drug to that of the selected chemotherapies. Patients may be eligible to crossover from physician's choice chemotherapy to MEK162 if they meet certain inclusion criteria including centrally confirmed disease progression. Approximately 360 patients from North America, Europe and Australia will be enrolled in this study.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of LGS carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube or primary peritoneum (invasive micropapillary serous carcinoma or invasive grade 1 serous carcinoma), confirmed histologically and verified by central pathology review. * Recurrent or persistent measurable disease that has progressed (defined as radiological and/or clinical progression; an increase in cancer antigen \[CA\]-125 alone is not sufficient) on or after last therapy (i.e., chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, surgery) and is not amenable to potentially curative intent surgery, as determined by the patient's treating physician. * Must have received at least 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen but have received no more than 3 lines of prior chemotherapy regimens, with no limit to the number of lines of prior hormonal therapy. Front-line therapy may include neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy and will be counted as 1 prior systemic regimen. Biological therapy (e.g. bevacizumab) administered as a single agent is considered a prior systemic regimen and not a prior chemotherapy regimen. Maintenance therapy is not considered its own regimen but should be included with the regimen that it follows. * Available archival tumor sample (excisional or core biopsy) for confirmation of LGS carcinoma diagnosis. If adequate archival tumor sample is not available, willingness to consent to tissue biopsy. * Suitable for treatment with at least one of the physician's choice chemotherapy options (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel or topotecan) as determined by the Investigator. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. * Additional criteria exist. Key Exclusion Criteria: * History or current evidence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or current risk factors for RVO (e.g., uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension, history of hyperviscosity or hypercoagulability syndromes). * Prior therapy with a MEK or BRAF inhibitor. * History of Gilbert's syndrome. * Impaired cardiovascular function or clinically significant cardiovascular diseases. * Uncontrolled or symptomatic brain metastases that are not stable or require steroids, are potentially life-threatening or have required radiation within 28 days prior to first dose of study treatment. * Concomitant malignancies or previous malignancies with less than a 5-year disease-free interval at the time of first dose of study treatment; patients with adequately resected basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or ductal carcinoma in situ may be enrolled irrespective of the time of diagnosis. * Known positive serology for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), active hepatitis B and/or active hepatitis C. * Prior randomization into this clinical study. * Additional criteria exist.
gender Based
true
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
FEMALE
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. intervention Names
    1. Drug: MEK162, MEK inhibitor; oral
    label
    MEK162
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. intervention Names
    1. Drug: Physician's choice chemotherapy
    label
    Physician's choice chemotherapy
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. MEK162
    description
    multiple dose, single schedule
    name
    MEK162, MEK inhibitor; oral
    type
    DRUG
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Physician's choice chemotherapy
    description
    Patients will receive one of the following chemotherapies as determined by the physician: * Liposomal doxorubicin, anthracycline antibiotic; intravenous (multiple dose, single schedule) * Paclitaxel, mitotic inhibitor; intravenous (multiple dose, single schedule) * Topotecan, topoisomerase 1 inhibitor; intravenous (multiple dose, single schedule)
    name
    Physician's choice chemotherapy
    type
    DRUG
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
341
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the earliest documented disease progression date or death due to any cause whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including Baseline) and an absolute increase of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 millimeter (mm). Appearance of new lesions \>=10 mm in diameter also constituted PD. If a participant did not have an event at the time of the analysis cutoff or at the start of any new therapy, PFS was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
    measure
    Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
    time Frame
    From randomization until documented progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever occurred first, for censored participants at the date of last adequate tumor assessment (up to 24 months)
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants who were alive at the data cutoff date were censored for overall survival at their last contact date.
    measure
    Overall Survival (OS)
    time Frame
    From randomization date to the date of death, for censored participants at their last contact date (up to 24 months)
  2. description
    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (responders). CR was defined as disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (\<) 10 mm, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum of diameters. Non-target lesions must be non-progressive disease.
    measure
    Objective Response Rate Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.1 (RECIST V1.1)
    time Frame
    From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 24 months)
  3. description
    DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented progression date or death due to any cause, and was calculated on responders only. Responders with no PD or death date or subsequent anticancer therapy by the data cutoff date, were censored for DOR at their last radiological assessment. Responders who received subsequent anticancer therapy prior to PD or death were censored at their last radiological assessment prior to initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy.
    measure
    Duration of Response (DOR)
    time Frame
    From the first radiographic evidence of response to the first documentation of PD or death, for censored participants at their last radiological assessment (up to 24 months)
  4. description
    Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease control was defined as a best response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) documented at Week 24 or later. CR was defined as disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 mm, and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum of diameters. Non-target lesions must be non-progressive disease. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters on study.
    measure
    Disease Control Rate (DCR)
    time Frame
    Week 24
  5. description
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study intervention without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
    measure
    Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
    time Frame
    From the first dose of study intervention until 30 days after the last dose (up to 9 years)
  6. description
    Number of participants with shifts from normal Baseline values (Grade 0) to abnormal post-baseline values on-study (shift to greater than or equal to Grade 3) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, v4.03 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade 0 to 3, Grade 0 to 4 and Grade 0 to Low 3 and 4 and Grade 0 to High 3 and 4 (for parameters total hemoglobin, lymphocytes, white blood cells, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium) were reported.
    measure
    Number of Participants With Shift Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter Values Based on National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
    time Frame
    From the first dose of study intervention until 30 days after the last dose (up to 9 years)
  7. description
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses participant reported outcomes, consisting of 5 functional scales, 3 symptoms scales, a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale, and 6 single-item scales. The global health status/QOL scale has 7 possible scores of responses (1=very poor to 7=excellent). All other items have 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that all transformed scores lie between 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best for global health status/QOL and functional scales, and 0 being the best and 100 being the worst for symptoms scales. In this study, global health status/QOL scale score was identified as the primary patient-reported outcome variable of interest. Physical functioning, emotional functioning, and social functioning scale scores were considered as secondary. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
    measure
    Quality of Life Per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30)
    time Frame
    Screening, every 8 weeks from randomization for the first 72 weeks (while on treatment), treatment discontinuation visit, 30-day safety follow-up visit
  8. description
    EORTC QLQ-OV28 contains 28 items which assess a comprehensive range of relevant issues: abdominal/gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, other chemotherapy side-effects, hormonal/menopausal symptoms, body image, attitude to disease/treatment and sexual functioning. The score for each domain and component score were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores indicate lower quality of life except for sexual functioning where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
    measure
    Quality of Life Per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Ovarian Cancer Module (QLQ-OV28)
    time Frame
    Screening, every 8 weeks from randomization for the first 72 weeks (while on treatment), treatment discontinuation visit, 30-day safety follow-up visit
  9. description
    FACT/GOG-NTX questionnaire consists of questions for dimensions related to physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being which contains 11 items, with responses scored on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) designed to capture the symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The summed scores of each item were reverted into standardized scores ranging from 0 to 44, with a higher score indicating a lower level of neurological toxicity and less effect on quality of life (ie, higher scores indicate better quality of life). The trial outcome index consists of two subscales from the FACT-G: Physical Well Being (7 items) and Functional Well Being (7 items), plus the Cervix Cancer-specific subscale (15 items). Each item in the trial outcome index scored using a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=very much). The summed scores of each item were reverted into standardized scores ranging from 0 to 116. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
    measure
    Quality of Life Per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX)
    time Frame
    Screening, every 8 weeks from randomization for the first 72 weeks (while on treatment), treatment discontinuation visit, 30-day safety follow-up visit
  10. description
    Ctrough of MEK162 is defined as the predose plasma concentration of MEK162. Ctrough of MEK162 was observed directly from data.
    measure
    Predose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of MEK162
    time Frame
    Predose on Study Days 1, 57, and 113.
  11. description
    Cmax is maximum observed plasma concentration. Cmax of MEK162 was observed directly from data.
    measure
    Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of MEK162
    time Frame
    2 hours ± 10 minutes postdose on Study Days 1, 57, and 113.
Full study description
brief Summary
The MILO Study (MEK Inhibitor in Low-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer) is a Phase 3 study during which patients with recurrent or persistent low-grade serous (LGS) carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube or primary peritoneum will receive either investigational study drug MEK162 or a chemotherapy chosen by the physician (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel or topotecan). Patients will be followed to compare the effectiveness of the study drug to that of the selected chemotherapies. Patients may be eligible to crossover from physician's choice chemotherapy to MEK162 if they meet certain inclusion criteria including centrally confirmed disease progression. Approximately 360 patients from North America, Europe and Australia will be enrolled in this study.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Grisham RN, Vergote I, Banerjee S, Drill E, Kalbacher E, Mirza MR, Romero I, Vuylsteke P, Coleman RL, Hilpert F, Oza AM, Westermann A, Oehler MK, Pignata S, Aghajanian C, Colombo N, Cibula D, Moore KN, Del Campo JM, Berger R, Marth C, Sehouli J, O'Malley DM, Churruca C, Kristensen G, Clamp A, Farley J, Iyer G, Ray-Coquard I, Monk BJ. Molecular Results and Potential Biomarkers Identified from the Phase 3 MILO/ENGOT-ov11 Study of Binimetinib versus Physician Choice of Chemotherapy in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 13;29(20):4068-4075. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0621.
    pmid
    37581616
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    Monk BJ, Grisham RN, Banerjee S, Kalbacher E, Mirza MR, Romero I, Vuylsteke P, Coleman RL, Hilpert F, Oza AM, Westermann A, Oehler MK, Pignata S, Aghajanian C, Colombo N, Drill E, Cibula D, Moore KN, Christy-Bittel J, Del Campo JM, Berger R, Marth C, Sehouli J, O'Malley DM, Churruca C, Boyd AP, Kristensen G, Clamp A, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I. MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 10;38(32):3753-3762. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01164. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
    pmid
    32822286
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-79051b228f7cf7c0cebc
      requested nct id
      NCT01849874
      primary nct id
      NCT01849874
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      d626fa717739cf3dda8aebd26e3ffaf109ec1e006da0173aee8007b288898b2c
      payload sha256
      7f78d1777cec980e505c374f2ccfb3cfeb28e693f88a12b3cfab04c86a6732d2
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-79051b228f7cf7c0cebc
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT01849874
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        me">KRAS</em>, or <em class="gene-name">NRAS</em> variant status predicted PFS. </li></ul></div></li><li><strong>Binimetinib</strong>: <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01849874">MILO/ENGOT-ov11</a> (NCT01849874) was a phase III trial of binimetinib, a small molecule inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2. The trial included 303 patients with recurren
        end
        104080
        exact text
        NCT01849874
        start
        104069
      2. context exact
        name">NRAS</em> variant status predicted PFS. </li></ul></div></li><li><strong>Binimetinib</strong>: <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01849874">MILO/ENGOT-ov11</a> (NCT01849874) was a phase III trial of binimetinib, a small molecule inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2. The trial included 303 patients with recurrent LGSC who had received one to thr
        end
        104114
        exact text
        NCT01849874
        start
        104103
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/ff9ceeeae0fbdc33fd.html
      source file sha256
      d626fa717739cf3dda8aebd26e3ffaf109ec1e006da0173aee8007b288898b2c
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:22:10.059252+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      2a71979c192f62071168507c9e3b23e31a4e8fe2e21ca0f7ee294555ff0250c9
      source title
      Ovarian Epithelial, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: May 14, 2025
        datetime
        2025-05-14T12:00:00Z
        display
        May 14, 2025

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice