Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT01774721 · OUTCOME

Duration of Response (DoR)

ARCHER1050: A Study of Dacomitinib vs. Gefitinib in 1st-Line Treatment Of Advanced NSCLC. · Source last updated 2023-11-14

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)

What was measured

DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response.

Analysis population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

Groups in this outcome

Dacomitinib

Participants received 45 mg of dacomitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.

Gefitinib

Participants received 250 mg of gefitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Dacomitinib227
Gefitinib225

Reported measurements

DoR: IRC review

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Dacomitinib170
Gefitinib161
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Dacomitinib14.8Not reported12.017.4Not reported
Gefitinib8.3Not reported7.49.2Not reported
DoR: Investigator assessment

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Dacomitinib171
Gefitinib158
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Dacomitinib15.9Not reported13.817.6Not reported
Gefitinib9.2Not reported8.211.0Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.307
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.529
    estimate Comment
    Based on stratified Cox regression model
    group Description
    Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on IRC review
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.403
    statistical Method
    1-sided stratified log-rank test
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.418
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.711
    estimate Comment
    Based on stratified Cox regression model
    group Description
    Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on Investigator assessment
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.545
    statistical Method
    1-sided stratified log-rank test
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.307
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.529
    estimate Comment
    Based on stratified Cox regression model
    group Description
    Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on IRC review
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.403
    statistical Method
    1-sided stratified log-rank test
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.418
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.711
    estimate Comment
    Based on stratified Cox regression model
    group Description
    Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on Investigator assessment
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.545
    statistical Method
    1-sided stratified log-rank test
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        12.0
        upper Limit
        17.4
        value
        14.8
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        7.4
        upper Limit
        9.2
        value
        8.3
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        170
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        161
      units
      Participants
    title
    DoR: IRC review
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        13.8
        upper Limit
        17.6
        value
        15.9
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        8.2
        upper Limit
        11.0
        value
        9.2
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        171
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        158
      units
      Participants
    title
    DoR: Investigator assessment
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      227
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      225
    units
    Participants
description
DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received 45 mg of dacomitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Dacomitinib
  2. description
    Participants received 250 mg of gefitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Gefitinib
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)
title
Duration of Response (DoR)
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice