NCT01774721 · OUTCOME
Duration of Response (DoR)
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEDIAN
- Unit
- months
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)
What was measured
DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response.
Analysis population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
Groups in this outcome
Dacomitinib
Participants received 45 mg of dacomitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.
Gefitinib
Participants received 250 mg of gefitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | 227 |
| Gefitinib | 225 |
Reported measurements
DoR: IRC review
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | 170 |
| Gefitinib | 161 |
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | 14.8 | Not reported | 12.0 | 17.4 | Not reported |
| Gefitinib | 8.3 | Not reported | 7.4 | 9.2 | Not reported |
DoR: Investigator assessment
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | 171 |
| Gefitinib | 158 |
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | 15.9 | Not reported | 13.8 | 17.6 | Not reported |
| Gefitinib | 9.2 | Not reported | 8.2 | 11.0 | Not reported |
Source statistical analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.307
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 0.529
- estimate Comment
- Based on stratified Cox regression model
- group Description
- Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on IRC review
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- <0.0001
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.403
- statistical Method
- 1-sided stratified log-rank test
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.418
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 0.711
- estimate Comment
- Based on stratified Cox regression model
- group Description
- Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on Investigator assessment
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- <0.0001
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.545
- statistical Method
- 1-sided stratified log-rank test
Complete source fields
- analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.307
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 0.529
- estimate Comment
- Based on stratified Cox regression model
- group Description
- Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on IRC review
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- <0.0001
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.403
- statistical Method
- 1-sided stratified log-rank test
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.418
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 0.711
- estimate Comment
- Based on stratified Cox regression model
- group Description
- Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on Investigator assessment
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- <0.0001
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.545
- statistical Method
- 1-sided stratified log-rank test
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 12.0
- upper Limit
- 17.4
- value
- 14.8
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 7.4
- upper Limit
- 9.2
- value
- 8.3
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 170
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 161
- units
- Participants
- title
- DoR: IRC review
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 13.8
- upper Limit
- 17.6
- value
- 15.9
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 8.2
- upper Limit
- 11.0
- value
- 9.2
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 171
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 158
- units
- Participants
- title
- DoR: Investigator assessment
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 227
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 225
- units
- Participants
- description
- DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response.
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- Participants received 45 mg of dacomitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.
- id
- OG000
- title
- Dacomitinib
- description
- Participants received 250 mg of gefitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.
- id
- OG001
- title
- Gefitinib
- param Type
- MEDIAN
- population Description
- ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)
- title
- Duration of Response (DoR)
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- months
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle