NCT01673867 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Study of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) Compared to Docetaxel in Previously Treated Metastatic Non-squamous NSCLC

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase: PHASE3
Status at capture: COMPLETED
Registry last update: 2023-02-08

The purpose of the study is to compare the overall survival of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) as compared with Docetaxel in subjects with non-squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of prior platinum-based chemotherapy

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

flow

Participant flow

→

baseline

Baseline characteristics

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS) Time in Months for All Randomized Participants at Primary Endpoint

→

outcome · POSTED

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

→

outcome · POSTED

Time To Objective Response (TTOR)

→

outcome · POSTED

Duration of Objective Response (DOOR)

→

outcome · POSTED

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Disease-Related Symptom Improvement by Week 12

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Expression at Baseline

→

outcome · POSTED

Objective Response Rate (ORR) by PD-L1 Expression at Baseline

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS) - Extended Collection

→

adverse events

Adverse events

→

more info

Limitations, agreements, and source contact

→

Who could take part

eligibility Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: * Men \& women ≥18 years of age * Subjects with histologically or cytologically-documented non-squamous cell NSCLC who present with Stage IIIB/IV disease or recurrent or progressive disease following multimodal therapy (radiation therapy, surgical resection, or definitive chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced disease) and who will receive study therapy as second or third line of treatment for advanced disease * Disease recurrence or progression during/after one prior platinum doublet-based chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic disease * Measurable disease by Computed tomography (CT)/Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) per RECIST 1.1 criteria * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1 * A formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue block or unstained slides of tumor sample (archival or recent) must be available for biomarker evaluation. Specimens must be received by the central lab prior to randomization. Biopsy should be excisional, incisional or core needle. Fine needle aspiration is insufficient Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects with untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases are excluded. Subjects are eligible if CNS metastases are asymptomatic or treated and subjects are neurologically returned to baseline for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment. In addition, subjects must be either off corticosteroids, or on a stable or decreasing dose of ≤10mg daily prednisone (or equivalent) * Subjects with carcinomatous meningitis * Subjects with active or recent history of known or suspected autoimmune disease. Subjects with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism only requiring hormone replacement, or skin disorders (vitiligo, psoriasis, or alopecia) not requiring systemic treatment are permitted to enroll * Subjects with a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of randomization * Prior therapy with anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1), anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), anti-programmed cell death ligand 2 (anti-PD-L2), anti-cluster of differentiation 137 (anti-CD137), or anti-Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibody (including Ipilimumab or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways) * Prior treatment with Docetaxel * Treatment with any investigational agent within 14 days of first administration of study treatment Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
healthy Volunteers: false
minimum Age: 18 Years
sex: ALL
std Ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT

Treatment arms and interventions

arm Groups

description
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends. Eligible patients may receive nivolumab at 480mg every 4 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation, withdrawal of consent or the study ends.
intervention Names
Biological: Nivolumab
label
Arm A: Nivolumab
type
EXPERIMENTAL
description
Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 concentrate for solution for intravenous infusion every 3 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends. Eligible patients may receive nivolumab at 480mg every 4 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation, withdrawal of consent or the study ends.
intervention Names
Drug: Docetaxel
label
Arm B: Docetaxel
type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

interventions

arm Group Labels
Arm A: Nivolumab
name
Nivolumab
other Names
BMS-936558 (Anti-PD1)
type
BIOLOGICAL
arm Group Labels
Arm B: Docetaxel
name
Docetaxel
other Names
Taxotere®
type
DRUG

Study design

allocation

RANDOMIZED

intervention Model

PARALLEL

masking Info

masking: NONE

primary Purpose

TREATMENT

Enrollment

count: 582
type: ACTUAL

Registered outcome plans (not posted results)

primary Outcomes

description
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. A participant who has not died will be censored at last known date alive. OS will be followed continuously while participants are on the study drug and every 3 months via in-person or phone contact after participants discontinue the study drug. Median and hazard ratio computed using Kaplan-Meier method.
measure
Overall Survival (OS) Time in Months for All Randomized Participants at Primary Endpoint
time Frame
Randomization until 413 deaths, up to March 2015 (approximately 29 months)

secondary Outcomes

description
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was a confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). BOR was defined as the best investigator-assessed response designation, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of objectively documented progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy (excluding on-treatment palliative radiotherapy of non-target bone lesions or Central Nervous System (CNS) lesions), whichever occurred first. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking, as reference, the baseline sum diameters. CR+PR, confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method.
measure
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
time Frame
From randomization to date of objectively documented progression (up to approximately 110 months)
description
Time to Objective Response for participants demonstrating a response (either CR or PR) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first confirmed response. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking, as reference, the baseline sum diameters.
measure
Time To Objective Response (TTOR)
time Frame
From randomization to the date of first confirmed response (up to approximately 110 months)
description
DOR was defined as the time from the date of first confirmed response to the date of the first documented tumor progression (per RECIST v1.1), as determined by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was evaluated only for confirmed responders (i.e. participants with confirmed CR or PR). CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking, as reference, the baseline sum diameters. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Median computed using Kaplan-Meier method.
measure
Duration of Objective Response (DOOR)
time Frame
From randomization to date of first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 110 months)
description
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression (per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. Participants who died without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Progression will be assessed every 6 weeks (from the first on-study radiographic assessment) until disease progression is noted. Progressive disease was defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. Median computed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
measure
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
time Frame
From randomization to first confirmed response to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 110 months)
description
Disease-related symptom improvement rate by Week 12 was defined as the percentage of randomized participants who had a 10 point or greater decrease from baseline in average symptom burden index score at any time between randomization and Week 12. The participant portion of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) consisted of 6 symptom-specific questions that addressed cough, dyspnea, fatigue, pain, hemoptysis, and anorexia, plus 3 summary items on symptom distress, interference with activity level, and global health-related Quality of Life (QoL). The scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best possible score and 100 being the worst possible score. The average symptom burden index score at each assessment was defined as the mean of the 6 symptom-specific questions of the LCSS. 95% CIs were computed using Clopper-Pearson Method.
measure
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Disease-Related Symptom Improvement by Week 12
time Frame
Randomization to Week 12
description
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. A participant who has not died will be censored at last known date alive. Overall Survival time was measured in months for all randomized participants grouped by their baseline PD-L1 expression level. PD-L1 expression in participants was defined as the percent of disease tumor cells demonstrating plasma membrane PD-L1 staining of any intensity using an immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay. Median computed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
measure
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Expression at Baseline
time Frame
From randomization to the date of death or last known date alive (up to approximately 110 months)
description
ORR was defined as the percentage of all randomized participants whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was a confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking, as reference, the baseline sum diameters. CR+PR, confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method. ORR was reported for all randomized participants grouped by their baseline PD-L1 expression level. PD-L1 expression in participants was defined as the percent of disease tumor cells demonstrating plasma membrane PD-L1 staining of any intensity using an immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay.
measure
Objective Response Rate (ORR) by PD-L1 Expression at Baseline
time Frame
From randomization to date of objectively documented progression (up to approximately 110 months)

Full study description

brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare the overall survival of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) as compared with Docetaxel in subjects with non-squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of prior platinum-based chemotherapy
detailed Description: CheckMate 057: CHECKpoint pathway and nivoluMAb clinical Trial Evaluation 057

Source references

references

citation
Barrera C, Corredor G, Viswanathan VS, Ding R, Toro P, Fu P, Buzzy C, Lu C, Velu P, Zens P, Berezowska S, Belete M, Balli D, Chang H, Baxi V, Syrigos K, Rimm DL, Velcheti V, Schalper K, Romero E, Madabhushi A. Deep computational image analysis of immune cell niches reveals treatment-specific outcome associations in lung cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Jun 1;7(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41698-023-00403-x.
pmid
37264091
type
DERIVED
citation
Hu S, Tang Z, Harrison JP, Hertel N, Penrod JR, May JR, Juarez-Garcia A, Holdgate O. Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Squamous and Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Prior Chemotherapy in China. Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Mar;7(2):273-284. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00383-x. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
pmid
36897427
type
DERIVED
citation
Borghaei H, Gettinger S, Vokes EE, Chow LQM, Burgio MA, de Castro Carpeno J, Pluzanski A, Arrieta O, Frontera OA, Chiari R, Butts C, Wojcik-Tomaszewska J, Coudert B, Garassino MC, Ready N, Felip E, Garcia MA, Waterhouse D, Domine M, Barlesi F, Antonia S, Wohlleber M, Gerber DE, Czyzewicz G, Spigel DR, Crino L, Eberhardt WEE, Li A, Marimuthu S, Brahmer J. Five-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Phase III Trials CheckMate 017 and 057: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):723-733. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01605. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
pmid
33449799
type
DERIVED
citation
Long GV, Tykodi SS, Schneider JG, Garbe C, Gravis G, Rashford M, Agrawal S, Grigoryeva E, Bello A, Roy A, Rollin L, Zhao X. Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2208-2213. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy408.
pmid
30215677
type
DERIVED
citation
Reck M, Brahmer J, Bennett B, Taylor F, Penrod JR, DeRosa M, Dastani H, Spigel DR, Gralla RJ. Evaluation of health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab or docetaxel in CheckMate 057. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Oct;102:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
pmid
30103096
type
DERIVED
citation
Vokes EE, Ready N, Felip E, Horn L, Burgio MA, Antonia SJ, Aren Frontera O, Gettinger S, Holgado E, Spigel D, Waterhouse D, Domine M, Garassino M, Chow LQM, Blumenschein G Jr, Barlesi F, Coudert B, Gainor J, Arrieta O, Brahmer J, Butts C, Steins M, Geese WJ, Li A, Healey D, Crino L. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057): 3-year update and outcomes in patients with liver metastases. Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):959-965. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy041.
pmid
29408986
type
DERIVED
citation
Horn L, Spigel DR, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Ready N, Steins M, Poddubskaya E, Borghaei H, Felip E, Paz-Ares L, Pluzanski A, Reckamp KL, Burgio MA, Kohlhaeufl M, Waterhouse D, Barlesi F, Antonia S, Arrieta O, Fayette J, Crino L, Rizvi N, Reck M, Hellmann MD, Geese WJ, Li A, Blackwood-Chirchir A, Healey D, Brahmer J, Eberhardt WEE. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3924-3933. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
pmid
29023213
type
DERIVED
citation
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhaufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crino L, Blumenschein GR Jr, Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
pmid
26412456
type
DERIVED