Skip to content
← Study library

NCT01558921 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Rectal Cancer And Pre-operative Induction Therapy Followed by Dedicated Operation. The RAPIDO Trial

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
Registry last update
2026-05-01

Currently the 3-year disease free survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is about 50%. Current standard treatment for patients at high risk of failing locally and/or systemically includes pre-operative long course radiotherapy (5 weeks) in combination with chemotherapy (so called neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). The neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been demonstrated to improve local control, but had no effect on the overall survival. Different studies in patients with rectal cancer studying the effect of adjuvant post operative chemotherapy did not result in an improved survival. This may be due the fact that rectal cancer surgery (TME) is associated with a high complication rate so substantial proportion of patients cannot receive chemotherapy postoperatively. An alternative approach is to administer the systemic therapy preoperative. To guarantee control of the rectum tumor short-course radiotherapy (5 days) is given, as different studies showed local control of the tumor for a long time. During this waiting period the patient is in a good condition to receive an optimal dose of chemotherapy. The investigators hypothesize that with this proposed protocol both the local tumour and possible micrometastases are effectively treated and that this will result in an increased survival. The investigators will compare this with the standard treatment of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by TME surgery and optional adjuvant chemotherapy.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Primary tumour characteristics: 1. Histological proof of newly diagnosed primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum 2. Locally advanced tumour fulfilling at least one of the following criteria on pelvic MRI indicating high risk of failing locally and/or systemically (clinical T4a, i.e. overgrowth to an adjacent organ or structure like the prostate, urinary bladder, uterus, sacrum, pelvic floor or side wall (according to tumor node metastasis (TNM-Classification version 5)), clinical T4b, i.e. peritoneal involvement, extramural vascular invasion (EMVI+). N2, i.e. four or more lymph nodes in the mesorectum showing morphological signs on MRI indicating metastatic disease. Positive Mesorectal Fascia (MRF+), i.e. tumor or lymph node \< 1 mm from the mesorectal fascia. Enlarged lateral nodes (LN), \> 1 cm (lat LN+) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Extensive growth into cranial part of the sacrum (above S3) or the lumbosacral nerve roots indicating that surgery will never be possible even if substantial tumour down-sizing is seen 2. Presence of metastatic disease or recurrent rectal tumour 3. Familial Adenomatosis Polyposis coli (FAP), Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), active Crohn's disease or active ulcerative Colitis 4. Concomitant malignancies, except for adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Subjects with prior malignancies must be disease-free for at least 5 years 5. Known Dihydro-Pyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency 6. Any contraindications to MRI (e.g. patients with pacemakers) 7. Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient's ability to give informed consent 8. Concurrent uncontrolled medical conditions 9. Any investigational treatment for rectal cancer within the past month 10. Pregnancy or breast feeding 11. Patients with known malabsorption syndromes or a lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract 12. Clinically significant (i.e. active) cardiac disease (e.g. congestive heart failure, symptomatic coronary artery disease and cardiac dysrhythmia, e.g. atrial fibrillation, even if controlled with medication) or myocardial infarction within the past 12 months 13. Patients with symptoms or history of peripheral neuropathy
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    experimental group (arm B) M1 scheme: 5 fractions of 5 Gy external beam radiation (5x5Gy) followed by CAPOX followed by TME surgery
    intervention Names
    1. Other: M1 scheme
    label
    B: 5x5Gy -> CAPOX -> surgery
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. description
    control group (arm A) standard long course chemoradiotherapy followed by TME surgery
    intervention Names
    1. Other: standard long course chemoradiotherapy
    label
    A: 5 weeks chemoradiation -> surgery
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. B: 5x5Gy -> CAPOX -> surgery
    description
    short course 5x5Gy radiation scheme is followed by six cycles of combination chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX)) and surgery. FOLFOX4 may be given as alternative for CAPOX
    name
    M1 scheme
    type
    OTHER
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. A: 5 weeks chemoradiation -> surgery
    description
    long course chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Optional adjuvant chemotherapy (CAPOX or FOLFOX) is allowed in the control group.
    name
    standard long course chemoradiotherapy
    type
    OTHER
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
intervention Model Description
standard arm: 5.5 weeks chemoradiation -\> surgery -\> optional chemotherapy experimental arm: 5x5Gy -\> 12 wks chemotherapy -\> surgery
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
920
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    DrTF = Either local or distant relapse or death caused by the rectal carcinoma whichever comes first. In case of nonrectal cancer related death patients will be censored at date of death. In case of a second primary tumour patients will be censored at the date of diagnosis of the second primary tumour. In case of local regrowth after wait \& watch strategy, followed by no resection or R2 resection, diagnosis local regrowth is taken. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored the last date of patient visit. Survival curves for Disease related Treatment Failure after 3 years of follow-up will be constructed using the method of Kaplan and Meier.
    measure
    Number of Patients With Disease Related Treatment Failure (DrTF)
    time Frame
    3 years follow-up after surgery
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    Number of patients in the experimental arm receiving 5 fractions of x 5 Gy (5x5Gy) radiotherapy followed by at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy. In the standard arm receiving the prescribed chemoradiotherapy.
    measure
    Number of Patients Completing the Prescribe Neo-adjuvant Treatment Dose
    time Frame
    30 days after neoadjuvant treatment
  2. description
    Number of patients with a Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) \> 1 mm
    measure
    Number of Patients With Negative CRM Negative
    time Frame
    30 days after surgery
  3. description
    Number of patients with a Pathological Complete Response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant treatment
    measure
    Number of Patients With a Pathological Complete Response (pCR)
    time Frame
    30 days after surgery
  4. description
    Number of patients with surgical complications: wound rupture, bleeding, infection, rectal anastomotic leak
    measure
    Number of Patients With Surgical Complications
    time Frame
    30 days after surgery
  5. description
    Quality of life QLQ-C30 core questionnaire EORTC quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology A total Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) score can range from 0 to 88, higher score means worse outcome.
    measure
    Quality of Life QLQ-C30 Scores
    time Frame
    3 year after surgery
  6. description
    Quality of life EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20. International EORTC questionnaire to assess Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN). A total QLQ-CIPN20 score can range from 0 to 100, higher score means worse outcome. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common phenomenon, often resulting in serious limitations in daily functioning and compromised quality of life.
    measure
    Quality of Life Questionnaire Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20)
    time Frame
    3 year after surgery
  7. description
    Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) scores in patients without a stoma three years after curative surgery Patient reported score (5 questions). 0-12 no LARS, 21-29 Minor LARS, 30-42 Major LARS. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
    measure
    Quality of Life LARS Scores
    time Frame
    3 year after surgery
  8. description
    Number of patients with a locoregional recurrence (LRR) after an R0/R1 resection
    measure
    Number of Patients With a Locoregional Recurrence
    time Frame
    5 years after surgery
  9. description
    Overall survival will be computed as the time between randomization and colorectal cancer or treatment related death. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored the last date of patient visit. In case of a second primary tumour patients will be censored at the date of diagnosis of the second primary tumour.
    measure
    Overall Survival
    time Frame
    10 year
Full study description
brief Summary
Currently the 3-year disease free survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is about 50%. Current standard treatment for patients at high risk of failing locally and/or systemically includes pre-operative long course radiotherapy (5 weeks) in combination with chemotherapy (so called neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). The neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been demonstrated to improve local control, but had no effect on the overall survival. Different studies in patients with rectal cancer studying the effect of adjuvant post operative chemotherapy did not result in an improved survival. This may be due the fact that rectal cancer surgery (TME) is associated with a high complication rate so substantial proportion of patients cannot receive chemotherapy postoperatively. An alternative approach is to administer the systemic therapy preoperative. To guarantee control of the rectum tumor short-course radiotherapy (5 days) is given, as different studies showed local control of the tumor for a long time. During this waiting period the patient is in a good condition to receive an optimal dose of chemotherapy. The investigators hypothesize that with this proposed protocol both the local tumour and possible micrometastases are effectively treated and that this will result in an increased survival. The investigators will compare this with the standard treatment of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by TME surgery and optional adjuvant chemotherapy.
detailed Description
Patients will be randomized between an experimental group (arm B) in which short course 5 x 5 Gy radiation scheme is followed by six cycles of combination chemotherapy (capecitabine/ 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) and surgery and a control group (arm A) with long course chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. In arm A adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed according to the local protocol of the institution. In both groups the rectal tumour will be removed by TME surgery or more extensive surgery if required because of tumour extent.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Nilsson PJ, van Etten B, Hospers GA, Pahlman L, van de Velde CJ, Beets-Tan RG, Blomqvist L, Beukema JC, Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Wiggers T, Glimelius B. Short-course radiotherapy followed by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer--the RAPIDO trial. BMC Cancer. 2013 Jun 7;13:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-279.
    pmid
    23742033
    type
    BACKGROUND
  2. citation
    Giunta EF, Bregni G, Pretta A, Deleporte A, Liberale G, Bali AM, Moretti L, Troiani T, Ciardiello F, Hendlisz A, Sclafani F. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Making sense of the results from the RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23 trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021 May;96:102177. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102177. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
    pmid
    33798955
    type
    BACKGROUND
  3. citation
    Jimenez-Fonseca P, Salazar R, Valenti V, Msaouel P, Carmona-Bayonas A. Is short-course radiotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy the new standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer? A sensitivity analysis of the RAPIDO clinical trial. Ann Oncol. 2022 Aug;33(8):786-793. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
    pmid
    35462008
    type
    BACKGROUND
  4. citation
    Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M. Should the RAPIDO schedule represent standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer? Ann Oncol. 2022 Aug;33(8):745-746. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 12. No abstract available.
    pmid
    35568280
    type
    BACKGROUND
  5. citation
    Patel A, Spychalski P, Corrao G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Glynne-Jones R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kobiela J. Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Oncol. 2021 Oct;60(10):1308-1316. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1953137. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
    pmid
    34308767
    type
    BACKGROUND
  6. citation
    Papaccio F, Rosello S, Huerta M, Gambardella V, Tarazona N, Fleitas T, Roda D, Cervantes A. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 3;12(12):3611. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123611.
    pmid
    33287114
    type
    BACKGROUND
  7. citation
    Ozturk SK, Martinez CG, Mens D, Verhoef C, Tosetto M, Sheahan K, de Wilt JHW, Hospers GAP, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, van der Post RS, Nagtegaal ID. Lymph node regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Histopathology. 2024 May;84(6):935-946. doi: 10.1111/his.15134. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
    pmid
    38192084
    type
    BACKGROUND
  8. citation
    Nilsson PJ, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Marijnen CAM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenberg E, Roodvoets AGH, van de Velde CJH, Glimelius B. Comment on the RAPIDO Trial Point-Counterpoint Debate. Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Feb 1;67(2):e126. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003138. Epub 2023 Oct 26. No abstract available.
    pmid
    37889954
    type
    BACKGROUND
  9. citation
    Polack M, van Pelt GW, van den Heuvel DH, Klein-Kranenbarg EM, Roodvoets AGH, Putter H, Crobach ASLP, Nagtegaal ID, Peeters KCMJ, Tollenaar RAEM, van Krieken JHJM, Mesker WE. The tumour-stroma ratio as predictive aid towards a biopsy-based treatment strategy in rectal carcinoma. Histopathology. 2025 Jul;87(1):44-57. doi: 10.1111/his.15423. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
    pmid
    40183423
    type
    BACKGROUND
  10. citation
    van der Valk MJM, Marijnen CAM, van Etten B, Dijkstra EA, Hilling DE, Kranenbarg EM, Putter H, Roodvoets AGH, Bahadoer RR, Fokstuen T, Ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes AMR, de Groot DJA, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP; Collaborative investigators. Compliance and tolerability of short-course radiotherapy followed by preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for high-risk rectal cancer - Results of the international randomized RAPIDO-trial. Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jun;147:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
    pmid
    32240909
    type
    RESULT
  11. citation
    Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Roodvoets AGH, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RGH, Blomqvist LK, Fokstuen T, Ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes A, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP; RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30555-6. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
    pmid
    33301740
    type
    RESULT
  12. citation
    Dijkstra EA, Hospers GAP, Kranenbarg EM, Fleer J, Roodvoets AGH, Bahadoer RR, Guren MG, Tjalma JJJ, Putter H, Crolla RMPH, Hendriks MP, Capdevila J, Radu C, van de Velde CJH, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM. Quality of life and late toxicity after short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer - The RAPIDO trial. Radiother Oncol. 2022 Jun;171:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.013. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
    pmid
    35447283
    type
    RESULT
see Also Links
  1. label
    Dutch Colorectal CancerGroup
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-8fa019931621ed827b5b
      requested nct id
      NCT01558921
      primary nct id
      NCT01558921
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      a558d780598239714e125739b5bd8435388a575761b36a23c5dce5b640f02acf
      payload sha256
      bfa0d91336508afb7590c4adab4e38692418f02f5b237be06fe05df74de12f38
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-8fa019931621ed827b5b
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT01558921
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        tabindex="-1">Data support giving all radiation therapy and chemotherapy neoadjuvantly.</p> <p id="_1365" tabindex="-1">The <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01558921">RAPIDO</a> trial (NCT01558921) randomly assigned 920 patients to receive either short-course radiation therapy followed by six cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine a
        end
        127421
        exact text
        NCT01558921
        start
        127410
      2. context exact
        ing all radiation therapy and chemotherapy neoadjuvantly.</p> <p id="_1365" tabindex="-1">The <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01558921">RAPIDO</a> trial (NCT01558921) randomly assigned 920 patients to receive either short-course radiation therapy followed by six cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) or nine cycles
        end
        127452
        exact text
        NCT01558921
        start
        127441
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/000ed4364d31964822.html
      source file sha256
      a558d780598239714e125739b5bd8435388a575761b36a23c5dce5b640f02acf
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:21:38.943216+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      387f265965c4b56957c6f58b4d8eb54b8d5a660b7f6ef6c433eff171e69dbb77
      source title
      Rectal Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: February 12, 2025
        datetime
        2025-02-12T12:00:00Z
        display
        February 12, 2025

    Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice