NCT01470443 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS
Study of GEMOX(Gemcitabine/Oxaliplatin) Versus XELOX(Xeloda/Oxaliplatin) in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.
- Phase
- PHASE3
- Status at capture
- UNKNOWN
- Registry last update
- 2019-05-21
The objective of the trial is to compare Progression free survival between GEMOX (gemcitabine/oxaliplatin)vs XELOX(capecitabine/oxaliplatin)in metastatic or unresectable Biliary tract carcinoma patients.
Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record
What did the study report?
Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.
No posted result sections were captured. Registered plans do not establish that a treatment works.
Who could take part
- eligibility Criteria
- Inclusion criteria 1. age ≥ 18 2. histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of biliary tract (intrahepatic, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gall bladder cancer.however, ampulla of vater cancer is excluded) 3. unresectable or metastatic 4. ECOG performance status of 0\~2 5. measurable or evaluable lesion per RECIST 1.1 criteria 6. Life expectancy≥12weeks 7. Adequate marrow, hepatic, renal and cardiac functions Serum aspartate transaminase and serum alanine transaminase≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), or AST and ALT ≤ 5 x ULN if liver function abnormalities are due to underlying malignancy Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN Absolute neutrophil count(ANC) ≥ 1,500/uL Platelets ≥ 100,0000/uL Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL 8. chemotherapy naïve patient: prior adjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy is allowed if the last date of drug administration is \> 6 months from the study entry date 9. provision of a signed written informed consent Exclusion criteria 1. severe co-morbid illness and/or active infections 2. ampulla of vater cancer is excluded 3. pregnant or lactating women 4. Active CNS metastases not controllable with radiotherapy or corticosteroids (however,CNS metastases(except for leptomeningeal seeding) are allowed if controlled by gamma knife surgery or surgery or radiotherapy or steroid) 5. known history of hypersensitivity to study drugs
- healthy Volunteers
- false
- minimum Age
- 18 Years
- sex
- ALL
- std Ages
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
- arm Groups
- description
- * Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/㎡, day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks * Oxaliplatin 100 mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
- intervention Names
- Drug: Oxaliplatin
- label
- GEMOX
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- description
- Xeloda, 1000mg/㎡ bid, day 1-15, every 3 weeks Oxaliplatin 130mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
- intervention Names
- Drug: Oxaliplatin
- label
- XELOX
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- interventions
- arm Group Labels
- XELOX
- description
- Oxaliplatin 130mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
- name
- Oxaliplatin
- type
- DRUG
- arm Group Labels
- GEMOX
- description
- Oxaliplatin 100 mg/㎡, day 1, every 3 weeks
- name
- Oxaliplatin
- type
- DRUG
Study design
- allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- masking Info
- masking
- NONE
- primary Purpose
- TREATMENT
Enrollment
- count
- 240
- type
- ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
- primary Outcomes
- description
- reference 6 months PFS 50% (GEMOX arm), noninferiority 6 months PFS 35% (XELOX arm), 1:1 randomization, accrual 24 months, 6 months follow-up after the last patient registry.
- measure
- Progression free survival of GEMOX vs XELOX
- time Frame
- 6 months PFS
- secondary Outcomes
- description
- physical examination, vital signs, body weight, ECOG performance status, clinical laboratory evaluations (biochemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), and any AE graded by using CTCAE v 4. Data on dose intensity will also be calculated.
- measure
- Safety profile
- time Frame
- 6 months follow-up after the last patient registry.
Full study description
- brief Summary
- The objective of the trial is to compare Progression free survival between GEMOX (gemcitabine/oxaliplatin)vs XELOX(capecitabine/oxaliplatin)in metastatic or unresectable Biliary tract carcinoma patients.
- detailed Description
- In patients with advanced BTC(biliary tract cancer), either gemcitabine-based, 5-FU-based chemotherapy or clinical trial is recommended as first-line treatment. According to ABC-02 trial, as compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.) Recent metaanalysis \[7\], analyzed 104 phase II and III trials comprising 2810 BTC patients and found that gemcitabine combined with platinum compounds such as cisplatin or oxaliplatin had superior response rate and survival when compared with gemcitabine alone. The metaanalysis concluded the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin or oxaliplatin to be the reference arm for future clinical trials. Meanwhile, oxaliplatin (l-OHP), an alkylating diaminocyclohexane platinum derivate, has been noted to display a marked cytotoxic synergism in combination with fluoropyrimidines against a variety of solid human tumour cells \[11\]. Based on these information, Nehls et al. \[12\] conducted a prospective phase II study of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/folinic acid in biliary system adenocarcinomas, and the disease control rate (responses and stable disease (SD)) was 56%, and the median OS was 9.5 months. To improve efficacy and to offer a more convenient treatment option for patients by reducing clinical visits and avoiding indwelling devices, they prospectively investigated the activity and toxicity profile of three-weekly intravenous oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine (XELOX), and concluded that the XELOX regimen was a well-tolerated and active treatment option for advanced BTC \[13\]. Given a lack of prospective, direct, comparison between XELOX and GEMOX regimens in advanced BTC, we propose a randomized phase III trial of GEMOX (gemcitabine/oxaliplatin) vs XELOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) in metastatic or unresectable BTC patients. With the assumption of a median 6-month PFS rate of 50% in the GEMOX arm and 35% in the XELOX arm (non-inferiority margin, 15%), a total of 103 patients were required under a two-sided 5% significance level and 80% power, with an accrual of 59 months and a follow-up of 6 months after the last patient registry, to show the non-inferiority of XELOX to GEMOX. An exponential distribution of time to progression was assumed. Allowing a dropout rate of 10%, we aimed to enroll 230 patients. An interim analysis was not planned.
Source references
- references
- citation
- Chen R, Zhang Y, Lin K, Huang D, You M, Lai Y, Wang J, Hu Y, Li N. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Gemcitabine Plus Oxaliplatin as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 22;13:871262. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.871262. eCollection 2022.
- pmid
- 35935821
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Kim ST, Kang JH, Lee J, Lee HW, Oh SY, Jang JS, Lee MA, Sohn BS, Yoon SY, Choi HJ, Hong JH, Kim MJ, Kim S, Park YS, Park JO, Lim HY. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):788-795. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz058.
- pmid
- 30785198
- type
- DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
Discovery and provenance
- release id
- ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
- edge id
- nct-edge-9a5743cc8649806cf49c
- requested nct id
- NCT01470443
- primary nct id
- NCT01470443
- source kind
- nci_explicit_reference_or_link
- source record id
- Source null
- source file sha256
- d4a7e217ec32243df9c5b7a0755da84d57be19ef1fa455323f329ec970c1107a
- payload sha256
- 08924daa706c3864018d6819431c30ee72b9020f78ac00a37ecc729910702db2
- payload
- clinical indication matching status
- not_inferred
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-9a5743cc8649806cf49c
- link basis
- explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
- nct id
- NCT01470443
- occurrences
- context exact
- 0.6–20.3) in arm A and 13.6 months (95% CI, 6.5–17.7) in arm B. </li></ul></div></li><li>A phase III noninferiority study (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01470443">NCT01470443</a>) enrolled 114 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancers, including 30 (26%) with primary gallbladder cancer. Patients were randomly assig
- end
- 123516
- exact text
- NCT01470443
- start
- 123505
- context exact
- 3) in arm A and 13.6 months (95% CI, 6.5–17.7) in arm B. </li></ul></div></li><li>A phase III noninferiority study (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01470443">NCT01470443</a>) enrolled 114 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancers, including 30 (26%) with primary gallbladder cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receiv
- end
- 123529
- exact text
- NCT01470443
- start
- 123518
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- source file
- /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/3d798b07edbaae547e.html
- source file sha256
- d4a7e217ec32243df9c5b7a0755da84d57be19ef1fa455323f329ec970c1107a
- source json pointer
- Source null
- source kind
- nci_explicit_reference_or_link
- source record id
- Source null
- source retrieved at
- 2026-09-09T23:21:58.285732+00:00
- source string basis
- UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
- source string sha256
- c63b4997a3ccf400d12acf814f2e7ce78a19db302ffdda1ce91a749ad6f733bd
- source title
- Bile Duct Cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma) Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
- source update dates
- context
- Updated: March 28, 2025
- datetime
- 2025-03-28T12:00:00Z
- display
- March 28, 2025
- release id
- ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
- edge id
- nct-edge-fdc6dec38fb499a027c2
- requested nct id
- NCT01470443
- primary nct id
- NCT01470443
- source kind
- nci_explicit_reference_or_link
- source record id
- Source null
- source file sha256
- 17d650834f2c48a435a163b8f01e294d57ba5e21b76b4c1fae79dba5fe49f8e5
- payload sha256
- 5732eb32954fa92a166f7d177e089a2e6f9eeb369a84e79aa4c66d12dbd0258c
- payload
- clinical indication matching status
- not_inferred
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-fdc6dec38fb499a027c2
- link basis
- explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
- nct id
- NCT01470443
- occurrences
- context exact
- ansaminitis, which was more prevalent in the mGEMOX arm (<em>P</em> = .04). </li></ul></div></li><li>A phase III noninferiority study (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01470443">NCT01470443</a>) enrolled 114 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancers, including 30 (26%) with primary gallbladder cancer. Patients were randomly assig
- end
- 62796
- exact text
- NCT01470443
- start
- 62785
- context exact
- which was more prevalent in the mGEMOX arm (<em>P</em> = .04). </li></ul></div></li><li>A phase III noninferiority study (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01470443">NCT01470443</a>) enrolled 114 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancers, including 30 (26%) with primary gallbladder cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receiv
- end
- 62809
- exact text
- NCT01470443
- start
- 62798
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- source file
- /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/86c0af42176678a171.html
- source file sha256
- 17d650834f2c48a435a163b8f01e294d57ba5e21b76b4c1fae79dba5fe49f8e5
- source json pointer
- Source null
- source kind
- nci_explicit_reference_or_link
- source record id
- Source null
- source retrieved at
- 2026-09-09T23:21:42.824565+00:00
- source string basis
- UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
- source string sha256
- 5dcee18031e5c8e1aeb2d95271a7763ae1f7c969517aeaac70ac5eaa39b87a26
- source title
- Gallbladder Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
- source update dates
- context
- Updated: February 12, 2025
- datetime
- 2025-02-12T12:00:00Z
- display
- February 12, 2025
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle