Skip to content
← Study library

NCT01399372 · REGISTRY CONDITION SEARCH

Rituximab, Methotrexate, Vincristine Sulfate, Procarbazine Hydrochloride, and Cytarabine With or Without Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Found through the registry condition index, not selected as a treatment recommendation. This discovery collection was restricted to studies with posted results.

Phase
PHASE2
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2023-07-20

RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Others interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as methotrexate, vincristine sulfate, procarbazine hydrochloride, and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high energy x rays to kill cancer cells. It is not yet know whether rituximab and combination chemotherapy are more effective when given with or without radiation therapy in treating patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial studies how well giving rituximab and combination chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy works in treating patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma(NHL) involving the brain, as demonstrated by contrast-enhanced Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histologic confirmation by one of the following within 6 weeks prior to registration: * A positive cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) cytology for lymphoma or a monoclonal lymphocyte population as defined by cell surface markers * A biopsy of the vitreous or uvea demonstrating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma * Brain biopsy Note: Patients in whom the type of lymphoma could not be determined or is unknown (eg, not enough tissue for further analysis) are assumed to have a B cell lymphoma and are eligible. 2. The patient must agree to submit tissue (i.e., the original H/E stained slides and immunohistochemistry studies) for central pathology review post-registration. 3. No evidence of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma as demonstrated by a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis within 6 weeks prior to registration (Note: Bone marrow biopsy is not required for registration but must be obtained prior to start of treatment.) 4. Age ≥ 18 5. History and physical examination within 6 weeks of registration 6. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) equal to 50 or higher, with the following exception • Patients with KPS 30 to 50 are eligible if the reason for the poor performance status is neurologic deficit from primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. (Patients with KPS 30 to 50 due to reasons other than primary CNS lymphoma are ineligible. Patients with KPS under 30 for any reason are ineligible) 7. Patient must have documentation of negative HIV-1 testing within 6 weeks prior to study registration (Separate counseling and consent as per institutional guidelines) 8. Complete blood count (CBC)/differential obtained within 2 weeks prior to study registration, with adequate bone marrow function defined as follows: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500 cells/mm3; * Platelets ≥ 100,000 cells/mm3; * Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥ 8.0 g/dl (Note: The use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb ≥ 8.0 g/dl is acceptable.); 9. Adequate liver function within 2 weeks prior to study registration, defined as follows: * Bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dl * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<2.5 times upper limit of normal 10. Adequate renal function within 2 weeks prior to study registration, defined as follows * Serum creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dl * Calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) \> 50cc/min/1.73m2, using the Cockcroft-Gault equation, as follows: Male: CrCl (ml/min) = (140-age) X (Actual weight in kg) / 72 x serum Creatinine (mg/dl). Female: CrCl (ml/min) = (140-age) X (Actual weight in kg) X 0.85 / 72 x serum Creatinine (mg/dl). Note: A measured CrCl from a 24 hour urine collection may also be used. 11. Women of childbearing potential and male participants must agree to practice adequate contraception during therapy 12. Patient must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study registration 13. Patient must be able to swallow pills. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years (For example, carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible) 2. Prior treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy for lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable; see section 1 3. Prior cranial irradiation 4. Severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows: * Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months; * Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months; * Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration; * Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy within 30 days before registration * Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects; note, however, that laboratory tests for liver function and coagulation parameters are not required for entry into this protocol. * Known pre-existing immunodeficiency as seen in organ transplant recipient. 5. Pregnancy or women of childbearing potential and men who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception; this exclusion is necessary because the treatment involved in this study may be significantly teratogenic. 6. Prior allergic reaction to any of the study drugs involved in this protocol.
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine for four 28-day cycles with vincristine for the first two cycles, followed 3-5 weeks later by two 28-day cycles of cytarabine.
    intervention Names
    1. Biological: Rituximab
    2. Drug: Cytarabine
    3. Drug: Methotrexate
    4. Drug: Procarbazine
    5. Drug: Vincristine
    label
    Chemotherapy
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
  2. description
    Rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine for four 28-day cycles with vincristine for the first two cycles, followed 2-5 weeks later by 3 weeks of low-dose whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), followed 3-5 weeks later by two 28-day cycles of cytarabine.
    intervention Names
    1. Biological: Rituximab
    2. Drug: Cytarabine
    3. Drug: Methotrexate
    4. Drug: Procarbazine
    5. Drug: Vincristine
    6. Radiation: low-dose whole-brain radiation therapy
    label
    Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Chemotherapy
    2. Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT
    description
    One 28-day cycle = 500 mg/m\^2 intravenously on day 1 and day 5.
    name
    Rituximab
    type
    BIOLOGICAL
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Chemotherapy
    2. Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT
    description
    One 28-day cycle = 3 g/m\^2 intravenously on day 1 and day 2.
    name
    Cytarabine
    type
    DRUG
  3. arm Group Labels
    1. Chemotherapy
    2. Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT
    description
    One 28-day cycle = 3.5 g/m\^2 intravenously (standard hydration/leucovorin support) on day 2.
    name
    Methotrexate
    other Names
    1. MTX
    type
    DRUG
  4. arm Group Labels
    1. Chemotherapy
    2. Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT
    description
    One 28-day cycle = 100 mg/m\^2 orally on days 2-8.
    name
    Procarbazine
    type
    DRUG
  5. arm Group Labels
    1. Chemotherapy
    2. Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT
    description
    One 28-day cycle = 1.4 mg/m\^2 intravenously, dose capped at 2.4mg, on day 2 and day 16.
    name
    Vincristine
    type
    DRUG
  6. arm Group Labels
    1. Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT
    description
    Total dose of 2340 cGy administered as 13 daily fractions of 180 cGy over 3 weeks. Participants with progressive disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) do not receive WBRT.
    name
    low-dose whole-brain radiation therapy
    other Names
    1. WBRT
    type
    RADIATION
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
91
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    Progression is defined as any of the following: more than 25% increase in the contrast-enhancing lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with baseline or best response; new site of disease (central nervous system or systemic); recurrent or new ocular disease; recurrent or positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. Progression-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression, death, or last known follow-up (censored). Progression-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Progression-free Survival
    time Frame
    From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Overall Survival
    time Frame
    From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.
  2. description
    Response was evaluated using the international criteria proposed by the International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) Study Group criteria. Complete Response was defined as no contrast brain enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no corticosteroid use for at least 2 weeks, a normal eye exam, and negative CSF cytology. Partial response was defined as at least 50% decrease in enhancing tumor on MRI compared with baseline imaging, no or minor retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) abnormality, and negative CSF cytology.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Experiencing Partial Response or Complete Response
    time Frame
    After 4th cycle of chemotherapy, approximately 4 months after randomization.
  3. description
    Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the EORTC QLQ-C30. The question responses range from 1 "very poor" to 7 "excellent" such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Data through five years after end of protocol treatment is included in the analysis, while summary data is provided only through three years due to very few participants after that timepoint.
    measure
    Global Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
    time Frame
    EORTC QLQ-C30 was administered at baseline, after cycle 4 of treatment (4 months), then every six months after end of treatment (7 months) for five years.
  4. description
    Neurocognitive failure is defined as cognitive failure on two or more of the following tests: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) Free Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recognition, Trail Making Test Part A, Trail Making Test Part B, and Controlled Oral Word Association. Cognitive failure for each test is defined as a change from baseline in raw score (post baseline score - baseline score) at or exceeding the minimally important difference reported in the literature \[determined by the reliable change index (RCI) method\] of -5, -3, -2,12, 26, and -12, respectively, indicating a worsening of neurocognitive function. Time to neurocognitive failure is defined as time from randomization to date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method and the distributions of failure times are compared between the arms. Two-year estimates are provided here.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Neurocognitive Failure
    time Frame
    Neurocognitive function tests were administered at baseline, after cycle 4 of treatment (4 months), then every six months after end of treatment (7 months) for five years. Two-year rates are provided here.
  5. description
    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Adverse events reported as definitely, probably, or possibly related to protocol treatment are considered to be related to treatment.
    measure
    Distribution of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Related to Protocol Treatment
    time Frame
    At the end of each chemotherapy 28-day cycle, then every 2 months for two years starting 4 weeks after treatment, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.
Full study description
brief Summary
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Others interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as methotrexate, vincristine sulfate, procarbazine hydrochloride, and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high energy x rays to kill cancer cells. It is not yet know whether rituximab and combination chemotherapy are more effective when given with or without radiation therapy in treating patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial studies how well giving rituximab and combination chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy works in treating patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.
detailed Description
OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine median progression-free survival (PFS) in both arms on an intent-to-treat basis. Secondary * To determine overall survival (OS) defined as the interval from randomization to death due to any cause. * To determine treatment-related neurotoxicity rates and disease-related cognitive deterioration in each arm, through the following methods: prospective formal neuropsychological evaluation, utilizing competing-risk methodology to account for death as a competing risk to neurotoxicity or cognitive deterioration from relapsed tumor burden/salvage treatment and incidence of clinically defined neurotoxicity as per investigator's assessment. * To determine if there exists differences between the two treatment arms in terms of health-related quality-of-life and symptoms over time. * To determine response (partial response (PR) and complete response (CR)) rate after methotrexate-based chemotherapy and after consolidation whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). * To determine chemotherapy-related toxicity, measured by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE), v.4.0. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center recursive-partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for primary central nervous system lymphoma on age and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (Class 1: age ≤ 50 years vs Class 2: age \> 50 years and KPS ≥ 70% vs Class 3: age \> 50 years and KPS \< 70%). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Source references
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
      edge id
      nct-edge-7ec4cac2a93bf1b07e9d
      requested nct id
      NCT01399372
      primary nct id
      NCT01399372
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      5133d5efc2041fb2554b035b378f2db0c15cad34dada88cd170d20b9c4e7432a
      payload sha256
      e77e0b94fb309ace2e2679098d62b9603069ea006a30a4275f7d38e055e4b4ca
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-7ec4cac2a93bf1b07e9d
      link basis
      returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
      nct id
      NCT01399372
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        NCT01399372
        end
        11
        exact text
        NCT01399372
        start
        0
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      query cond
      Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
      query disease state id
      ds-primary-central-nervous-system-lymphoma
      source file
      /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-primary-central-nervous-system-lymphoma-000.json
      source file sha256
      5133d5efc2041fb2554b035b378f2db0c15cad34dada88cd170d20b9c4e7432a
      source json pointer
      /studies/20/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      b29c9b89a0deb74bc136eaa9ab333b40b01efcbcb298b56088d851d0313046c3

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice