Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT01327885 · OUTCOME

Overall Survival (OS)

Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin With Dacarbazine in Subjects With Soft Tissue Sarcoma · Source last updated 2023-06-22

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause, up to 5 years 5 months

What was measured

OS was defined as the time in months from the date of treatment start until death, regardless of cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, participants were censored either at the date that participant was last known to be alive or the date of study cut-off, whichever was earlier. Participants who died on the date of randomization had a survival time of 0.5 day. Allocation of randomization numbers were performed based upon the following stratification factors: (a) Histology (adipocytic \[ADI\] or leiomyosarcoma \[LMS\]), (b) Region (Region 1: USA and Canada; or Region 2: Western Europe, Australia, Israel; or Region 3: Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Asia), and (c) Number of prior regimens for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) (2 or greater than \[\>\] 2 prior regimens).

Analysis population: Full analysis set (FAS) (Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set) included all participants who were randomized.

Groups in this outcome

Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate

Eribulin mesylate at a dose of 1.4 mg/m\^2 was administered IV as a bolus infusion over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every 21-day treatment cycle.

Arm B: Dacarbazine

Dacarbazine at a dose of 850 mg/m\^2, 1000 mg/m\^2, or 1200 mg/m\^2 (as selected by the Principal Investigator \[PI\] or designee prior to randomization according to the participant's clinical status) was administered as an IV infusion over 15-30 minutes (or up to 60 minutes as per institutional guidelines) on Day 1 of every 21-day treatment cycle.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate228
Arm B: Dacarbazine224

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate13.5Not reported10.915.6Not reported
Arm B: Dacarbazine11.5Not reported9.613.0Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.618
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.954
    estimate Comment
    The Hazard Ratio is based on a stratified Cox regression model including treatment as covariate, and histology, geographic region, and number of prior regimens for advanced STS as strata.
    group Description
    Statistical analysis was designed to detect superiority of Arm A (eribulin) over Arm B (dacarbazine). OS was compared between the two treatment arms using a two-sided stratified log-rank test at a nominal significance level of 0.0455 (adjusted for the interim analysis). This was the primary analysis that was performed when the target number of events (\~353 deaths) was observed.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    p Value
    =0.0169
    p Value Comment
    The P-value was calculated by 2-sided log-rank test as stratified by histology, geographic region, and number of prior regimens for advanced STS.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.768
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.618
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.954
    estimate Comment
    The Hazard Ratio is based on a stratified Cox regression model including treatment as covariate, and histology, geographic region, and number of prior regimens for advanced STS as strata.
    group Description
    Statistical analysis was designed to detect superiority of Arm A (eribulin) over Arm B (dacarbazine). OS was compared between the two treatment arms using a two-sided stratified log-rank test at a nominal significance level of 0.0455 (adjusted for the interim analysis). This was the primary analysis that was performed when the target number of events (\~353 deaths) was observed.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    p Value
    =0.0169
    p Value Comment
    The P-value was calculated by 2-sided log-rank test as stratified by histology, geographic region, and number of prior regimens for advanced STS.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.768
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        10.9
        upper Limit
        15.6
        value
        13.5
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        9.6
        upper Limit
        13.0
        value
        11.5
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      228
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      224
    units
    Participants
description
OS was defined as the time in months from the date of treatment start until death, regardless of cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, participants were censored either at the date that participant was last known to be alive or the date of study cut-off, whichever was earlier. Participants who died on the date of randomization had a survival time of 0.5 day. Allocation of randomization numbers were performed based upon the following stratification factors: (a) Histology (adipocytic \[ADI\] or leiomyosarcoma \[LMS\]), (b) Region (Region 1: USA and Canada; or Region 2: Western Europe, Australia, Israel; or Region 3: Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Asia), and (c) Number of prior regimens for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) (2 or greater than \[\>\] 2 prior regimens).
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Eribulin mesylate at a dose of 1.4 mg/m\^2 was administered IV as a bolus infusion over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every 21-day treatment cycle.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate
  2. description
    Dacarbazine at a dose of 850 mg/m\^2, 1000 mg/m\^2, or 1200 mg/m\^2 (as selected by the Principal Investigator \[PI\] or designee prior to randomization according to the participant's clinical status) was administered as an IV infusion over 15-30 minutes (or up to 60 minutes as per institutional guidelines) on Day 1 of every 21-day treatment cycle.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Arm B: Dacarbazine
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Full analysis set (FAS) (Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set) included all participants who were randomized.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause, up to 5 years 5 months
title
Overall Survival (OS)
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice