Skip to content
Triangle logo TriangleGet started
← Full study record

NCT01327053 · OUTCOME

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS)

A Phase II Study of Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma · Source last updated 2019-08-28

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
Percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
6 months

What was measured

ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.

Analysis population: The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, \& including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.

Groups in this outcome

LDE225 200mg laBCC

The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.

LDE225 800mg laBCC

The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.

LDE225 200mg mBCC

The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.

LDE225 800mg mBCC

The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
LDE225 200mg laBCC42
LDE225 800mg laBCC93
LDE225 200mg mBCC13
LDE225 800mg mBCC23

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
LDE225 200mg laBCC42.9Not reported27.759.0Not reported
LDE225 800mg laBCC37.6Not reported27.848.3Not reported
LDE225 200mg mBCC15.4Not reported1.945.4Not reported
LDE225 800mg mBCC17.4Not reported5.038.8Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        27.7
        upper Limit
        59.0
        value
        42.9
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        27.8
        upper Limit
        48.3
        value
        37.6
      3. group Id
        OG002
        lower Limit
        1.9
        upper Limit
        45.4
        value
        15.4
      4. group Id
        OG003
        lower Limit
        5.0
        upper Limit
        38.8
        value
        17.4
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      42
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      93
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      13
    4. group Id
      OG003
      value
      23
    units
    Participants
description
ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    id
    OG000
    title
    LDE225 200mg laBCC
  2. description
    The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    id
    OG001
    title
    LDE225 800mg laBCC
  3. description
    The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    id
    OG002
    title
    LDE225 200mg mBCC
  4. description
    The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    id
    OG003
    title
    LDE225 800mg mBCC
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, \& including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
6 months
title
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS)
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice