Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT01136733 · OUTCOME

Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

A Study of E7080 Alone, and in Combination With Everolimus in Subjects With Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Following One Prior Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Targeted Treatment · Source last updated 2019-02-27

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Date of randomization into Phase 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1) to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death (whichever occurred first), assessed up to data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), up to approximately 2 years and 3 months

What was measured

PFS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study drug to the first documentation of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimates were used to estimate median PFS, presented with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks (or sooner if there was evidence of progressive disease using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scan acquisition techniques (including use or nonuse of intravenous (IV) contrast). Tumor response was determined at the site by the investigator and radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 in the evaluation of the tumor assessment scans. The date of objective disease progression was defined as the earliest date of radiological disease progression. Participants removed from therapy due to clinical progression with no radiologic confirmation were censored at their last radiologic assessment date.

Analysis population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants.

Groups in this outcome

Phase 1b (Cohort 1): 12 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus

Oral lenvatinib (12 mg) and everolimus (5 mg) were taken once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. Dose Escalation Cohort-Cycle 1: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day in a fasting state with water. Cycles 2, 3, etc. and Expansion Cohort: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day with water, either after a meal or in a fasting state. Dose escalation began with 3 participants in Cohort 1. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred, then enrollment proceeded to Cohort 2. If 1 participant had a DLT, 3 more participants were enrolled in Cohort 1. If 1 or none of the 6 participants had a DLT, then enrollment proceeded to Cohort 2. If 2 or more participants had a DLT during Cycle 1, the dose escalation committee (DEC) decided if they were lenvatinib-related and if enrollment could proceed, lenvatinib was reduced to 6 mg daily (everolimus dose was not reduced). If it could not be determined that the DLTs were lenvatinib-related, enrollment stopped.

Phase 1b (Cohort 2): 18 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus

Oral lenvatinib (18 mg) and everolimus (5 mg) were taken once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. Dose Escalation Cohort-Cycle 1: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day in the fasting state with water. Cycles 2, 3, etc. and Expansion Cohort: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day with water, either after a meal or in a fasting state. Dose escalation began with 3 participants in Cohort 1. If no DLT occurred, then enrollment would proceed to Cohort 3. If 1 participant had a DLT, 3 more participants were enrolled in Cohort 2. If 1 or none of the 6 participants exhibited a DLT, enrollment proceeded to Cohort 3. If 2 or more participants had a DLT during Cycle 1, dose escalation ceased and additional participants were enrolled to the next lower dose to achieve a total of 6 participants in that cohort.

Phase 1b (Cohort 3): 24 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus

Oral lenvatinib (24 mg) and everolimus (5 mg) were taken once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. Dose Escalation Cohort-Cycle 1: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day in the fasting state with water. Cycles 2, 3, etc. and Expansion Cohort: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day with water, either after a meal or in a fasting state. Dose escalation began with 3 participants in Cohort 1. If no DLT occurred, then enrollment proceeded to Cohort 4. If 1 participant had a DLT, 3 more participants were enrolled Cohort 3. If 1 or none of the 6 participants exhibited a DLT, then enrollment proceeded to Cohort 4. If 2 or more participants had a DLT during Cycle 1, dose escalation ceased and additional participants were enrolled to the next lower dose to achieve a total of 6 participants in that cohort.

Phase 1b (Cohort 4): 24 mg Lenvatinib Plus 10 mg Everolimus

The DLT was achieved and no participants were enrolled into this cohort.

Phase 2 (Arm A): 18 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus

Oral lenvatinib (18 mg) and everolimus (5 mg) were taken once daily in the morning (consistently with or without food) with water, in continuous 28-day (4-week) cycles. Treatment cycles began with the first dose of study drug in Cycle 1 and continued in 28-day (4-week) consecutive cycles until completion of the off-treatment assessments (within 30 days after the last study treatment administration). Study drugs were administered at the clinic for the first dose and on the pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling days.

Phase 2 (Arm B): 24 mg Lenvatinib

Oral lenvatinib (24 mg) was taken once daily in the morning (consistently with or without food) with water, in continuous 28-day (4-week) cycles.

Phase 2 (Arm C): 10 mg Everolimus

Oral everolimus (10 mg) was taken once daily in the morning (consistently either with or without food) with water, in continuous 28-day (4-week) cycles.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Phase 1b (Cohort 1): 12 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus0
Phase 1b (Cohort 2): 18 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus0
Phase 1b (Cohort 3): 24 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus0
Phase 1b (Cohort 4): 24 mg Lenvatinib Plus 10 mg Everolimus0
Phase 2 (Arm A): 18 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus51
Phase 2 (Arm B): 24 mg Lenvatinib52
Phase 2 (Arm C): 10 mg Everolimus50

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Phase 2 (Arm A): 18 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus14.6Not reported5.920.1Not reported
Phase 2 (Arm B): 24 mg Lenvatinib7.4Not reported5.610.2Not reported
Phase 2 (Arm C): 10 mg Everolimus5.5Not reported3.57.1Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.24
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.68
    estimate Comment
    Hazard ratio between treatment groups and corresponding 95% CI was estimated using the stratified Cox regression model (stratified by hemoglobin and corrected serum calcium) with treatment as a factor.
    group Description
    Null hypothesis of no difference in PFS was analyzed using the stratified log-rank test with hemoglobin (less than or equal to 13 g/dL vs greater than 13 g/dL for males; and less than or equal to 11.5 g/dL vs greater than 11.5 g/dL for females) and corrected serum calcium (greater than or equal to 10 mg/dL vs less than 10 mg/dL) as stratification factors. Each null hypothesis was tested at a nominal alpha=0.05.
    group Ids
    1. OG004
    2. OG006
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    =0.0005
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.40
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.38
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.98
    group Ids
    1. OG005
    2. OG006
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.0479
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.61
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  3. ci Lower Limit
    0.39
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.10
    group Ids
    1. OG004
    2. OG005
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.1209
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.66
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.24
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.68
    estimate Comment
    Hazard ratio between treatment groups and corresponding 95% CI was estimated using the stratified Cox regression model (stratified by hemoglobin and corrected serum calcium) with treatment as a factor.
    group Description
    Null hypothesis of no difference in PFS was analyzed using the stratified log-rank test with hemoglobin (less than or equal to 13 g/dL vs greater than 13 g/dL for males; and less than or equal to 11.5 g/dL vs greater than 11.5 g/dL for females) and corrected serum calcium (greater than or equal to 10 mg/dL vs less than 10 mg/dL) as stratification factors. Each null hypothesis was tested at a nominal alpha=0.05.
    group Ids
    1. OG004
    2. OG006
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    =0.0005
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.40
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.38
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.98
    group Ids
    1. OG005
    2. OG006
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.0479
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.61
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  3. ci Lower Limit
    0.39
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.10
    group Ids
    1. OG004
    2. OG005
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.1209
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.66
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG004
        lower Limit
        5.9
        upper Limit
        20.1
        value
        14.6
      2. group Id
        OG005
        lower Limit
        5.6
        upper Limit
        10.2
        value
        7.4
      3. group Id
        OG006
        lower Limit
        3.5
        upper Limit
        7.1
        value
        5.5
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      0
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      0
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      0
    4. group Id
      OG003
      value
      0
    5. group Id
      OG004
      value
      51
    6. group Id
      OG005
      value
      52
    7. group Id
      OG006
      value
      50
    units
    Participants
description
PFS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study drug to the first documentation of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimates were used to estimate median PFS, presented with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks (or sooner if there was evidence of progressive disease using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scan acquisition techniques (including use or nonuse of intravenous (IV) contrast). Tumor response was determined at the site by the investigator and radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 in the evaluation of the tumor assessment scans. The date of objective disease progression was defined as the earliest date of radiological disease progression. Participants removed from therapy due to clinical progression with no radiologic confirmation were censored at their last radiologic assessment date.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Oral lenvatinib (12 mg) and everolimus (5 mg) were taken once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. Dose Escalation Cohort-Cycle 1: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day in a fasting state with water. Cycles 2, 3, etc. and Expansion Cohort: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day with water, either after a meal or in a fasting state. Dose escalation began with 3 participants in Cohort 1. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred, then enrollment proceeded to Cohort 2. If 1 participant had a DLT, 3 more participants were enrolled in Cohort 1. If 1 or none of the 6 participants had a DLT, then enrollment proceeded to Cohort 2. If 2 or more participants had a DLT during Cycle 1, the dose escalation committee (DEC) decided if they were lenvatinib-related and if enrollment could proceed, lenvatinib was reduced to 6 mg daily (everolimus dose was not reduced). If it could not be determined that the DLTs were lenvatinib-related, enrollment stopped.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Phase 1b (Cohort 1): 12 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus
  2. description
    Oral lenvatinib (18 mg) and everolimus (5 mg) were taken once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. Dose Escalation Cohort-Cycle 1: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day in the fasting state with water. Cycles 2, 3, etc. and Expansion Cohort: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day with water, either after a meal or in a fasting state. Dose escalation began with 3 participants in Cohort 1. If no DLT occurred, then enrollment would proceed to Cohort 3. If 1 participant had a DLT, 3 more participants were enrolled in Cohort 2. If 1 or none of the 6 participants exhibited a DLT, enrollment proceeded to Cohort 3. If 2 or more participants had a DLT during Cycle 1, dose escalation ceased and additional participants were enrolled to the next lower dose to achieve a total of 6 participants in that cohort.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Phase 1b (Cohort 2): 18 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus
  3. description
    Oral lenvatinib (24 mg) and everolimus (5 mg) were taken once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. Dose Escalation Cohort-Cycle 1: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day in the fasting state with water. Cycles 2, 3, etc. and Expansion Cohort: both study drugs were taken at the same time of day with water, either after a meal or in a fasting state. Dose escalation began with 3 participants in Cohort 1. If no DLT occurred, then enrollment proceeded to Cohort 4. If 1 participant had a DLT, 3 more participants were enrolled Cohort 3. If 1 or none of the 6 participants exhibited a DLT, then enrollment proceeded to Cohort 4. If 2 or more participants had a DLT during Cycle 1, dose escalation ceased and additional participants were enrolled to the next lower dose to achieve a total of 6 participants in that cohort.
    id
    OG002
    title
    Phase 1b (Cohort 3): 24 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus
  4. description
    The DLT was achieved and no participants were enrolled into this cohort.
    id
    OG003
    title
    Phase 1b (Cohort 4): 24 mg Lenvatinib Plus 10 mg Everolimus
  5. description
    Oral lenvatinib (18 mg) and everolimus (5 mg) were taken once daily in the morning (consistently with or without food) with water, in continuous 28-day (4-week) cycles. Treatment cycles began with the first dose of study drug in Cycle 1 and continued in 28-day (4-week) consecutive cycles until completion of the off-treatment assessments (within 30 days after the last study treatment administration). Study drugs were administered at the clinic for the first dose and on the pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling days.
    id
    OG004
    title
    Phase 2 (Arm A): 18 mg Lenvatinib Plus 5 mg Everolimus
  6. description
    Oral lenvatinib (24 mg) was taken once daily in the morning (consistently with or without food) with water, in continuous 28-day (4-week) cycles.
    id
    OG005
    title
    Phase 2 (Arm B): 24 mg Lenvatinib
  7. description
    Oral everolimus (10 mg) was taken once daily in the morning (consistently either with or without food) with water, in continuous 28-day (4-week) cycles.
    id
    OG006
    title
    Phase 2 (Arm C): 10 mg Everolimus
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Full analysis set included all randomized participants.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Date of randomization into Phase 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1) to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death (whichever occurred first), assessed up to data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
title
Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice