Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT01120184 · OUTCOME

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to IRF Assessment

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) Plus Pertuzumab/Pertuzumab Placebo Versus Trastuzumab [Herceptin] Plus a Taxane in Participants With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MARIANNE) · Source last updated 2024-03-04

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Up to 46 months from randomization until clinical cutoff of 16-Sept-2014 (at Screening, every 9 weeks for 81 weeks, then every 12 weeks thereafter and/or up to 42 days after last dose)

What was measured

Objective response was defined as having complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), assessed according to RECIST version 1.1, using radiographic images submitted to the IRF up to and including the confirmatory tumor assessment 4 to 6 weeks after study drug discontinuation. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and short-axis reduction in pathological lymph nodes to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum. Response was determined using 2 consecutive tumor assessments at least 4 weeks apart. The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR (ie, the objective response rate \[ORR\]) was calculated as \[number of participants meeting the respective criteria divided by the number analyzed\] multiplied by 100. Corresponding CIs were computed using the Blyth-Still-Casella exact method.

Analysis population: ITT Population. Only participants with measurable disease at Baseline were included in the analysis.

Groups in this outcome

Trastuzumab + Taxane

Participants received trastuzumab plus either docetaxel or paclitaxel. The regimen was chosen at the investigator's discretion. Option 1: trastuzumab 8 mg/kg via IV infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1, then 6 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of each subsequent 3-week cycle; plus a minimum of 6 cycles with docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Option 2: trastuzumab 4 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1, then 2 mg/kg IV weekly beginning on Day 8 of Cycle 1; plus a minimum of 18 weeks with paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 IV weekly. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination. If trastuzumab or docetaxel were discontinued for toxicity, the other agent could be continued as monotherapy.

Trastuzumab Emtansine + Placebo

Participants received trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab-placebo. Trastuzumab emtansine was administered as 3.6 mg/kg via IV infusion, following completion of the placebo IV infusion, on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination.

Trastuzumab Emtansine + Pertuzumab

Participants received trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab. Trastuzumab emtansine was administered as 3.6 mg/kg via IV infusion, following completion of the pertuzumab IV infusion, on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Pertuzumab was given as 840 mg IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1, then 420 mg IV on Day 1 of each subsequent 3-week cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Trastuzumab + Taxane287
Trastuzumab Emtansine + Placebo303
Trastuzumab Emtansine + Pertuzumab299

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Trastuzumab + Taxane67.9Not reported62.2673.31Not reported
Trastuzumab Emtansine + Placebo59.7Not reported54.0765.30Not reported
Trastuzumab Emtansine + Pertuzumab64.2Not reported58.6269.65Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    -15.9
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    -0.5
    estimate Comment
    Direction of comparison: Trastuzumab Emtansine + Placebo vs Trastuzumab + Taxane
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    param Type
    Difference in Response Rate
    param Value
    -8.2
  2. ci Lower Limit
    -11.4
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    3.9
    estimate Comment
    Direction of comparison: Trastuzumab Emtansine + Pertuzumab vs Trastuzumab + Taxane
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    param Type
    Difference in Response Rate
    param Value
    -3.7
  3. ci Lower Limit
    -3.3
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    12.2
    estimate Comment
    Direction of comparison: Trastuzumab Emtansine + Pertuzumab vs Trastuzumab Emtansine + Placebo
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    param Type
    Difference in Response Rate
    param Value
    4.5
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    -15.9
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    -0.5
    estimate Comment
    Direction of comparison: Trastuzumab Emtansine + Placebo vs Trastuzumab + Taxane
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    param Type
    Difference in Response Rate
    param Value
    -8.2
  2. ci Lower Limit
    -11.4
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    3.9
    estimate Comment
    Direction of comparison: Trastuzumab Emtansine + Pertuzumab vs Trastuzumab + Taxane
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    param Type
    Difference in Response Rate
    param Value
    -3.7
  3. ci Lower Limit
    -3.3
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    12.2
    estimate Comment
    Direction of comparison: Trastuzumab Emtansine + Pertuzumab vs Trastuzumab Emtansine + Placebo
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    param Type
    Difference in Response Rate
    param Value
    4.5
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        62.26
        upper Limit
        73.31
        value
        67.9
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        54.07
        upper Limit
        65.30
        value
        59.7
      3. group Id
        OG002
        lower Limit
        58.62
        upper Limit
        69.65
        value
        64.2
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      287
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      303
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      299
    units
    Participants
description
Objective response was defined as having complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), assessed according to RECIST version 1.1, using radiographic images submitted to the IRF up to and including the confirmatory tumor assessment 4 to 6 weeks after study drug discontinuation. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and short-axis reduction in pathological lymph nodes to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum. Response was determined using 2 consecutive tumor assessments at least 4 weeks apart. The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR (ie, the objective response rate \[ORR\]) was calculated as \[number of participants meeting the respective criteria divided by the number analyzed\] multiplied by 100. Corresponding CIs were computed using the Blyth-Still-Casella exact method.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received trastuzumab plus either docetaxel or paclitaxel. The regimen was chosen at the investigator's discretion. Option 1: trastuzumab 8 mg/kg via IV infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1, then 6 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of each subsequent 3-week cycle; plus a minimum of 6 cycles with docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Option 2: trastuzumab 4 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1, then 2 mg/kg IV weekly beginning on Day 8 of Cycle 1; plus a minimum of 18 weeks with paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 IV weekly. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination. If trastuzumab or docetaxel were discontinued for toxicity, the other agent could be continued as monotherapy.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Trastuzumab + Taxane
  2. description
    Participants received trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab-placebo. Trastuzumab emtansine was administered as 3.6 mg/kg via IV infusion, following completion of the placebo IV infusion, on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Trastuzumab Emtansine + Placebo
  3. description
    Participants received trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab. Trastuzumab emtansine was administered as 3.6 mg/kg via IV infusion, following completion of the pertuzumab IV infusion, on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Pertuzumab was given as 840 mg IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1, then 420 mg IV on Day 1 of each subsequent 3-week cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination.
    id
    OG002
    title
    Trastuzumab Emtansine + Pertuzumab
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
ITT Population. Only participants with measurable disease at Baseline were included in the analysis.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Up to 46 months from randomization until clinical cutoff of 16-Sept-2014 (at Screening, every 9 weeks for 81 weeks, then every 12 weeks thereafter and/or up to 42 days after last dose)
title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to IRF Assessment
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice