Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT01096368 · OUTCOME

Overall Survival (OS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only

Maintenance Chemotherapy or Observation Following Induction Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ependymoma · Source last updated 2026-04-30

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of OS are presented.

What was measured

Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS are calculated from randomization date to death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 90.46% stagewise adjusted Wald confidence interval.

Analysis population: Eligible, randomized participants (intent-to-treat)

Groups in this outcome

Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance Chemotherapy

Patients with supratentorial ependymoma (Grade II without GTR1 or Grade III) or any infratentorial ependymoma who have undergone gross or near total resection (GTR or NTR) or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are randomized to undergo conformal radiotherapy over 6-7 weeks followed by maintenance chemotherapy. Maintenance chemotherapy comprised of vincristine IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1-3 only, etoposide IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1-3, cisplatin IV over 1-8 hours on day 1, and cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on days 2-3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients without GTR or NTR at enrollment require induction chemotherapy (see Arm I) and possibly second surgery before randomization.

Arm III: Randomized to Radiation Only

Patients with supratentorial ependymoma (Grade II without GTR1 or ST Grade III) or any infratentorial ependymoma (Grade II or III) who have undergone gross or near total resection or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are randomized to undergo conformal radiotherapy over 6-7 weeks and then undergo observation.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance Chemotherapy164
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation Only161

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance Chemotherapy88.3Not reported81.892.6Not reported
Arm III: Randomized to Radiation Only86.9Not reported79.891.6Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.463
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    90.46
    ci Upper Limit
    1.238
    estimate Comment
    Hazard ratio is based on hazard of death for Arm II over hazard of death for Arm III. Confidence interval is stage-wise adjusted for multiple interim analyses.
    group Description
    It was planned to test the superiority of RT+maintenance vs. RT alone as measured by OS using the hazard ratio via a 1-sided log-rank test using the planned sample size of 160 subjects per arm which was optimized for the EFS outcome. A one-sided significance threshold of 5% was planned for this comparison as well.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.172
    p Value Comment
    P-value is one-sided. After adjusting for interim analyses, the a priori threshold for significance for the final analysis is one-sided alpha=0.031.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.757
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.463
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    90.46
    ci Upper Limit
    1.238
    estimate Comment
    Hazard ratio is based on hazard of death for Arm II over hazard of death for Arm III. Confidence interval is stage-wise adjusted for multiple interim analyses.
    group Description
    It was planned to test the superiority of RT+maintenance vs. RT alone as measured by OS using the hazard ratio via a 1-sided log-rank test using the planned sample size of 160 subjects per arm which was optimized for the EFS outcome. A one-sided significance threshold of 5% was planned for this comparison as well.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.172
    p Value Comment
    P-value is one-sided. After adjusting for interim analyses, the a priori threshold for significance for the final analysis is one-sided alpha=0.031.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.757
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        81.8
        upper Limit
        92.6
        value
        88.3
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        79.8
        upper Limit
        91.6
        value
        86.9
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      164
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      161
    units
    Participants
description
Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS are calculated from randomization date to death from any cause. The comparison between randomized arms (post-radiation maintenance chemotherapy versus post-radiation observation only) is conveyed by the hazard ratio and 90.46% stagewise adjusted Wald confidence interval.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Patients with supratentorial ependymoma (Grade II without GTR1 or Grade III) or any infratentorial ependymoma who have undergone gross or near total resection (GTR or NTR) or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are randomized to undergo conformal radiotherapy over 6-7 weeks followed by maintenance chemotherapy. Maintenance chemotherapy comprised of vincristine IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1-3 only, etoposide IV over 60-120 minutes on days 1-3, cisplatin IV over 1-8 hours on day 1, and cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on days 2-3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients without GTR or NTR at enrollment require induction chemotherapy (see Arm I) and possibly second surgery before randomization.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Arm II: Randomized to Radiation With Maintenance Chemotherapy
  2. description
    Patients with supratentorial ependymoma (Grade II without GTR1 or ST Grade III) or any infratentorial ependymoma (Grade II or III) who have undergone gross or near total resection or achieved CR either after first or second resection or after post-operative induction chemotherapy are randomized to undergo conformal radiotherapy over 6-7 weeks and then undergo observation.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Arm III: Randomized to Radiation Only
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
Eligible, randomized participants (intent-to-treat)
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Up to 10 years after enrollment. 5-year estimates of OS are presented.
title
Overall Survival (OS) in Children Who Have Completely Resected Ependymoma or Achieved CR and Are Treated With Post-radiation Maintenance Chemotherapy or Post-radiation Observation Only
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice