Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT01013649 · OUTCOME

Overall Survival (Percentage of Participants Alive) by Baseline Fatigue Group

Gemcitabine Hydrochloride With or Without Erlotinib Hydrochloride Followed by the Same Chemotherapy Regimen With or Without Radiation Therapy and Capecitabine or Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Has Been Removed by Surgery · Source last updated 2026-02-23

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
Percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
90% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From enrollment (step 1) to death or last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of the phase III analysis was 13.2 years, measured from enrollment. Two- and five-year rates are reported here.

What was measured

Overall survival is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival time is measured from enrollment (step 1) to date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Baseline fatigue is measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) questionnaire which has a range of 0 to 52 with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Combining treatment arms, patients with low fatigue at baseline (FACIT-F score \> 30) will be compared to patients with high fatigue at baseline (FACIT-F scores ≤ 30).

Analysis population: Eligible participants enrolled at step 1 who consented to the quality of life study component and have baseline FACT-F data.

Groups in this outcome

High Fatigue

Participants from both treatment arms with FACIT-F score ≤ 30.

Low Fatigue

Participants from both treatment arms with FACIT-F score \> 30.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
High Fatigue71
Low Fatigue352

Reported measurements

Two years
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 90% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
High Fatigue54.1Not reported44.364.0Not reported
Low Fatigue58.1Not reported53.762.6Not reported
Five years
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 90% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
High Fatigue21.1Not reported13.029.5Not reported
Low Fatigue25.1Not reported21.129.1Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.71
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    90
    ci Upper Limit
    1.13
    estimate Comment
    Reference level = High Fatigue group
    group Description
    Four hundred evaluable patients provide at least 90% power to detect a HR of 0.70 between low and high fatigue groups using a baseline FACIT-F score cut point of 30, with a 1-sided alpha of 0.05.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.21
    p Value Comment
    One-sided significance level = 0.05
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.89
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.71
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    90
    ci Upper Limit
    1.13
    estimate Comment
    Reference level = High Fatigue group
    group Description
    Four hundred evaluable patients provide at least 90% power to detect a HR of 0.70 between low and high fatigue groups using a baseline FACIT-F score cut point of 30, with a 1-sided alpha of 0.05.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.21
    p Value Comment
    One-sided significance level = 0.05
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.89
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
anticipated Posting Date
2025-12
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        44.3
        upper Limit
        64.0
        value
        54.1
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        53.7
        upper Limit
        62.6
        value
        58.1
    title
    Two years
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        13.0
        upper Limit
        29.5
        value
        21.1
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        21.1
        upper Limit
        29.1
        value
        25.1
    title
    Five years
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      71
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      352
    units
    Participants
description
Overall survival is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival time is measured from enrollment (step 1) to date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Baseline fatigue is measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) questionnaire which has a range of 0 to 52 with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Combining treatment arms, patients with low fatigue at baseline (FACIT-F score \> 30) will be compared to patients with high fatigue at baseline (FACIT-F scores ≤ 30).
dispersion Type
90% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants from both treatment arms with FACIT-F score ≤ 30.
    id
    OG000
    title
    High Fatigue
  2. description
    Participants from both treatment arms with FACIT-F score \> 30.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Low Fatigue
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
Eligible participants enrolled at step 1 who consented to the quality of life study component and have baseline FACT-F data.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From enrollment (step 1) to death or last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of the phase III analysis was 13.2 years, measured from enrollment. Two- and five-year rates are reported here.
title
Overall Survival (Percentage of Participants Alive) by Baseline Fatigue Group
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice