Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00976911 · OUTCOME

Duration of Objective Response (Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)

AURELIA: A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) Added to Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer · Source last updated 2022-06-21

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Screening Visit, Every 8 weeks (or 9 weeks if receiving topotecan) until progression reported between day of first participant randomized (29 October 2009) until cutoff date of 14 November 2011

What was measured

For randomized participants who achieved an objective response per modified RECIST, duration of objective response was defined as the time from the date of the first occurrence of a CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until the date that progressive disease or death was documented (whichever occurred first). Participants who had an objective response and did not experience disease progression or death by the time of analysis were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment. Summaries of duration of objective response (median and percentiles) were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves. 95% CI for duration of objective response was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Analysis population: ITT Population; only participants with a best overall confirmed response of CR or PR were included in the analysis.

Groups in this outcome

Chemotherapy

Participants received one of the following chemotherapies at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel, 80 mg/m\^2 as a 1-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q4w OR topotecan 4 mg/m\^2 as a 30-minute IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 q4w (alternatively, a 1.25 mg/m\^2 dose could have been administered over 30 minutes on Days 1-5 q3w) OR PLD 40 mg/m\^2 as a 1 mg/min infusion on Day 1 q4w (after Cycle 1 the drug could have been administered as a 1 hour infusion). Depending on chosen chemotherapy, pre-medication was implemented according to local practices.

Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab

Participants received one of the following chemotherapies at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel, 80 mg/m\^2 as a 1-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q4w OR topotecan 4 mg/m\^2 as a 30-minute IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 q4w (alternatively, a 1.25 mg/m\^2 dose could have been administered over 30 minutes on Days 1-5 q3w) OR PLD 40 mg/m\^2 as a 1 mg/min infusion on Day 1 q4w (after Cycle 1 the drug could have been administered as a 1 hour infusion). Depending on chosen chemotherapy, pre-medication was implemented according to local practices. The chosen chemotherapy was combined with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV q2w (or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q3w if used in combination with topotecan 1.25 mg/m\^2 on Days 1-5 on a q3w schedule). The initial bevacizumab infusion was over 90 minutes, with subsequent infusions over 60 minutes and then 30 minutes, as tolerated.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Chemotherapy18
Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab40

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Chemotherapy5.4Not reported3.819.23Not reported
Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab9.4Not reported6.6011.63Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.225
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.900
    estimate Comment
    Hazard ratio was estimated by unstratified Cox regression model.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    p Value
    0.0202
    p Value Comment
    Unstratified analysis
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.450
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    p Value
    0.0081
    statistical Method
    Peto-Peto-Prentice
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.225
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.900
    estimate Comment
    Hazard ratio was estimated by unstratified Cox regression model.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    p Value
    0.0202
    p Value Comment
    Unstratified analysis
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.450
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    p Value
    0.0081
    statistical Method
    Peto-Peto-Prentice
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        3.81
        upper Limit
        9.23
        value
        5.4
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        6.60
        upper Limit
        11.63
        value
        9.4
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      18
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      40
    units
    Participants
description
For randomized participants who achieved an objective response per modified RECIST, duration of objective response was defined as the time from the date of the first occurrence of a CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until the date that progressive disease or death was documented (whichever occurred first). Participants who had an objective response and did not experience disease progression or death by the time of analysis were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment. Summaries of duration of objective response (median and percentiles) were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves. 95% CI for duration of objective response was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received one of the following chemotherapies at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel, 80 mg/m\^2 as a 1-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q4w OR topotecan 4 mg/m\^2 as a 30-minute IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 q4w (alternatively, a 1.25 mg/m\^2 dose could have been administered over 30 minutes on Days 1-5 q3w) OR PLD 40 mg/m\^2 as a 1 mg/min infusion on Day 1 q4w (after Cycle 1 the drug could have been administered as a 1 hour infusion). Depending on chosen chemotherapy, pre-medication was implemented according to local practices.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Chemotherapy
  2. description
    Participants received one of the following chemotherapies at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel, 80 mg/m\^2 as a 1-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q4w OR topotecan 4 mg/m\^2 as a 30-minute IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 q4w (alternatively, a 1.25 mg/m\^2 dose could have been administered over 30 minutes on Days 1-5 q3w) OR PLD 40 mg/m\^2 as a 1 mg/min infusion on Day 1 q4w (after Cycle 1 the drug could have been administered as a 1 hour infusion). Depending on chosen chemotherapy, pre-medication was implemented according to local practices. The chosen chemotherapy was combined with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV q2w (or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q3w if used in combination with topotecan 1.25 mg/m\^2 on Days 1-5 on a q3w schedule). The initial bevacizumab infusion was over 90 minutes, with subsequent infusions over 60 minutes and then 30 minutes, as tolerated.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
ITT Population; only participants with a best overall confirmed response of CR or PR were included in the analysis.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Screening Visit, Every 8 weeks (or 9 weeks if receiving topotecan) until progression reported between day of first participant randomized (29 October 2009) until cutoff date of 14 November 2011
title
Duration of Objective Response (Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice