Skip to content
← Study library

NCT00952289 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

COntrolled MyeloFibrosis Study With ORal JAK Inhibitor Treatment: The COMFORT-I Trial

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2018-03-12

This was a randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib (INCB018424) tablets to matching placebo tablets in patients diagnosed with Myelofibrosis (either Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) or Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF).

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects must be diagnosed with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF) according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria * Subjects with myelofibrosis requiring therapy must be classified as high risk OR intermediate risk level 2 according to the prognostic factors defined by the International Working Group * Subjects with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, 2 or 3 * Subjects who have not previously received treatment with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 6 months * Subjects with inadequate bone marrow reserve as demonstrated by specific clinical laboratory counts * Subjects with inadequate liver or renal function * Subjects with clinically significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic or viral infection which require therapy * Subjects with an active malignancy over the previous 5 years except specific skin cancers. * Subjects with severe cardiac conditions * Subjects who have had splenic irradiation within 12 months
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Participants received ruxolitinib orally twice a day. The starting dose was determined based on Baseline platelet count. Patients with Baseline platelet count \> 200,000/μL began a dose regimen of 20 mg twice daily. Patients with Baseline platelet count of 100,000/μL to 200,000/μL (inclusive) began a dose regimen of 15 mg twice daily. The dose was adjusted by the Investigator based on efficacy and safety to a maximum of 25 mg twice daily. Patients receiving benefit could continue treatment until the later of marketing approval or when the last randomized patient remaining in the study had completed Week 144 (36 months).
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Ruxolitinib
    label
    Ruxolitinib
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. description
    Placebo tablets matching ruxolitinib were administered orally twice a day at a starting dose based on Baseline platelet count. Doses were titrated using the same guidelines as for active drug. Patients meeting certain protocol requirements detailed below were given the opportunity to cross over to ruxolitinib treatment.
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Ruxolitinib
    2. Drug: Placebo
    label
    Placebo
    type
    PLACEBO_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Placebo
    2. Ruxolitinib
    description
    Ruxolitinib phosphate tablets 5 mg administered as oral doses.
    name
    Ruxolitinib
    other Names
    1. INCB018424
    type
    DRUG
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Placebo
    description
    Matching placebo tablets were administered as oral doses in the same manner as active drug.
    name
    Placebo
    type
    DRUG
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
DOUBLE
who Masked
  1. PARTICIPANT
  2. INVESTIGATOR
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
309
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    Spleen volume was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or by computed tomography (CT) scans if MRI was not suitable, and analyzed by a blinded central laboratory reader. Patients who withdrew, crossed over to ruxolitinib prior to the visit, or had a missing value at the visit were considered non-responders.
    measure
    Number of Participants Achieving ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline to Week 24
    time Frame
    Baseline and Week 24
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    The maintenance of ≥ 35% reduction from Baseline in spleen volume was assessed up until the data cutoff date using the Kaplan-Meier method for patients who had at least one measured ≥ 35% reduction, and who either had at least one subsequent measurement or who subsequently dropped out prior to another assessment.
    measure
    Maintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive Ruxolitinib
    time Frame
    Baseline Visit and every 12 weeks until the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
  2. description
    The duration of ≥ 35% reduction from Baseline in spleen volume was defined as the longest duration of consecutive measurements of ≥ 35% reduction observed before the data cut-off date for patients who had at least one measured ≥ 35% reduction, and who either had at least one subsequent measurement or, who subsequently dropped out prior to another assessment. The duration of a ≥ 35% reduction from Baseline in spleen volume was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Duration of Maintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive Ruxolitinib
    time Frame
    Baseline Visit and every 12 weeks until the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
  3. description
    Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
    measure
    Number of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Total Symptom Score From Baseline to Week 24
    time Frame
    Baseline and Week 24. Baseline total score was the average of the daily total scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. The Week 24 total score was the average of daily total scores from the 28 days prior to the Week 24 visit.
  4. description
    Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms hence a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
    measure
    Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Symptom Score
    time Frame
    Baseline and Week 24. Baseline total score was the average of the daily total scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. The Week 24 total score was the average of daily total scores from the 28 days prior to the Week 24 visit.
  5. description
    Overall survival is reported here by the number of deaths from randomization until the data cut-off. Patients were censored at the time of database cut-off or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of data cut. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Overall Survival
    time Frame
    From randomization to the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
  6. description
    Overall survival was assessed by the time to death or censoring. Patients were censored at the time of database cut-off or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of data cut. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Overall Survival Time
    time Frame
    From randomization to the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
  7. description
    Overall survival is reported here by the number of deaths from randomization until 01 March 2011. Patients were censored at this time or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of data cut. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. This outcome reports data from August 2009 through March 2011 to coincide with a pre-planned New Drug Application (NDA) 120-day safety update.
    measure
    Overall Survival - Extended Data
    time Frame
    From randomization to 4 months after the data cut-off date (up to 18 months).
  8. description
    Overall survival was assessed by the time to death or censoring up until 01 March 2011. Patients were censored at this time or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of data cut. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. This outcome reports data from August 2009 through March 2011 to coincide with a pre-planned New Drug Application (NDA) 120-day safety update.
    measure
    Overall Survival Time - Extended Data
    time Frame
    From randomization to 4 months after the data cut-off date (up to 18 months).
  9. description
    Overall survival is reported here by the number of deaths from randomization until the data cut-off. Patients were censored at the time of database cut-off or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of database cut-off. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Overall Survival at Week 144
    time Frame
    Week 144
  10. description
    Overall survival was assessed by the time to death or censoring. Patients were censored at the time of database cut-off or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of database cut-off. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Overall Survival Time at Week 144
    time Frame
    Week 144
Full study description
brief Summary
This was a randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib (INCB018424) tablets to matching placebo tablets in patients diagnosed with Myelofibrosis (either Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) or Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF).
detailed Description
Patients with spleen growth of greater than 25% based on an increase in spleen volume from Baseline were eligible for early unblinding, and for patients on placebo, cross over to ruxolitinib prior to the primary study endpoint being reached. If this spleen growth occurred before Week 24, it must have been accompanied by specific worsening of symptoms, based on worsening early satiety accompanied by weight loss or worsening pain requiring daily narcotic use. After Week 24, asymptomatic spleen growth alone was sufficient for early unblinding and potential cross over. Patients found to have been randomized to ruxolitinib after early unblinding prior to Week 24 were discontinued. When half of the patients remaining in the study completed the Week 36 visit and all patients enrolled completed Week 24 or discontinued, the database was frozen and the primary analysis was conducted. Once this was complete, all patients were unblinded and patients who had been randomized to placebo were given the opportunity to cross over to ruxolitinib treatment, provided hematology laboratory parameters were adequate; Patients receiving benefit could continue treatment until the later of marketing approval or when the last randomized patient remaining in the study had completed Week 144 (36 months).
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Verstovsek S, Mesa R, Gotlib J, et al. Results of COMFORT-I, a randomized double-blind phase III trial of JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB18424 (424) vs placebo (PB) for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). The 47th Annual ASCO meeting, Chicago, IL. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (suppl; abstract 6500). Verstovsek S, Mesa R, Gotlib J, et al. Results of COMFORT-I, a randomized, double-blind phase III trial of the JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (INCB018424) versus placebo for patients with myelofibrosis. The 16th Annual EHA meeting, London, UK. Haematologica 2011; 96 (suppl 2; abstract 0505).
    type
    BACKGROUND
  2. citation
    Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, Catalano JV, Deininger M, Miller C, Silver RT, Talpaz M, Winton EF, Harvey JH Jr, Arcasoy MO, Hexner E, Lyons RM, Paquette R, Raza A, Vaddi K, Erickson-Viitanen S, Koumenis IL, Sun W, Sandor V, Kantarjian HM. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):799-807. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110557.
    pmid
    22375971
    type
    RESULT
  3. citation
    Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, Catalano JV, Deininger MW, Miller CB, Silver RT, Talpaz M, Winton EF, Harvey JH Jr, Arcasoy MO, Hexner EO, Lyons RM, Paquette R, Raza A, Vaddi K, Erickson-Viitanen S, Sun W, Sandor V, Kantarjian HM. Efficacy, safety and survival with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: results of a median 2-year follow-up of COMFORT-I. Haematologica. 2013 Dec;98(12):1865-71. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.092155. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
    pmid
    24038026
    type
    RESULT
  4. citation
    Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, Catalano JV, Deininger MW, Miller CB, Silver RT, Talpaz M, Winton EF, Harvey JH Jr, Arcasoy MO, Hexner EO, Lyons RM, Raza A, Vaddi K, Sun W, Peng W, Sandor V, Kantarjian H; COMFORT-I investigators. Efficacy, safety, and survival with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: results of a median 3-year follow-up of COMFORT-I. Haematologica. 2015 Apr;100(4):479-88. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.115840. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
    pmid
    25616577
    type
    RESULT
  5. citation
    Verstovsek S, Gotlib J, Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, Cervantes F, Harrison CN, Paquette R, Sun W, Naim A, Langmuir P, Dong T, Gopalakrishna P, Gupta V. Long-term survival in patients treated with ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis: COMFORT-I and -II pooled analyses. J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Sep 29;10(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0527-7.
    pmid
    28962635
    type
    DERIVED
  6. citation
    Miller CB, Komrokji RS, Mesa RA, Sun W, Montgomery M, Verstovsek S. Practical Measures of Clinical Benefit With Ruxolitinib Therapy: An Exploratory Analysis of COMFORT-I. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Aug;17(8):479-487. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 12.
    pmid
    28606598
    type
    DERIVED
  7. citation
    Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, Catalano JV, Deininger MW, Miller CB, Silver RT, Talpaz M, Winton EF, Harvey JH Jr, Arcasoy MO, Hexner EO, Lyons RM, Paquette R, Raza A, Jones M, Kornacki D, Sun K, Kantarjian H; COMFORT-I investigators. Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Feb 22;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0417-z.
    pmid
    28228106
    type
    DERIVED
  8. citation
    Deininger M, Radich J, Burn TC, Huber R, Paranagama D, Verstovsek S. The effect of long-term ruxolitinib treatment on JAK2p.V617F allele burden in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015 Sep 24;126(13):1551-4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-635235. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
    pmid
    26228487
    type
    DERIVED
  9. citation
    Vannucchi AM, Kantarjian HM, Kiladjian JJ, Gotlib J, Cervantes F, Mesa RA, Sarlis NJ, Peng W, Sandor V, Gopalakrishna P, Hmissi A, Stalbovskaya V, Gupta V, Harrison C, Verstovsek S; COMFORT Investigators. A pooled analysis of overall survival in COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, 2 randomized phase III trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2015 Sep;100(9):1139-45. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.119545. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
    pmid
    26069290
    type
    DERIVED
  10. citation
    Mesa RA, Verstovsek S, Gupta V, Mascarenhas JO, Atallah E, Burn T, Sun W, Sandor V, Gotlib J. Effects of ruxolitinib treatment on metabolic and nutritional parameters in patients with myelofibrosis from COMFORT-I. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Apr;15(4):214-221.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.12.008. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
    pmid
    25682576
    type
    DERIVED
  11. citation
    Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Verstovsek S, Al-Ali HK, Gotlib J, Gisslinger H, Levy R, Siulnik A, Gupta V, Khan M, DiPersio JF, McQuitty M, Catalano JV, Hunter DS, Knoops L, Deininger M, Cervantes F, Miller C, Vannucchi AM, Silver RT, Barbui T, Talpaz M, Barosi G, Winton EF, Mendeson E, Harvey JH Jr, Arcasoy MO, Hexner E, Lyons RM, Paquette R, Raza A, Sun W, Sandor V, Kantarjian HM, Harrison C. Comparison of placebo and best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Haematologica. 2014 Feb;99(2):292-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.087650. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
    pmid
    23911705
    type
    DERIVED
  12. citation
    Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Gupta V, Catalano JV, Deininger MW, Shields AL, Miller CB, Silver RT, Talpaz M, Winton EF, Harvey JH, Hare T, Erickson-Viitanen S, Sun W, Sandor V, Levy RS, Kantarjian HM, Verstovsek S. Effect of ruxolitinib therapy on myelofibrosis-related symptoms and other patient-reported outcomes in COMFORT-I: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 1;31(10):1285-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4489. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
    pmid
    23423753
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-527fd2b068be665951ea
      requested nct id
      NCT00952289
      primary nct id
      NCT00952289
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=0&sort=id%3Aasc
      source record id
      1c261eb0-f426-47a1-8281-62282d207644
      source file sha256
      0dba7a040bbbf460aa9f482c5b67c9f28f75fc9df775ee1e7b345b758f780e07
      payload sha256
      79ac26ff2b9766150903e10157aa30b9186242f3d3a987aef7952b491541a076
      payload
      application numbers
      1. NDA202192
      2. NDA217180
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-527fd2b068be665951ea
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT00952289
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        ss than or equal to 100 x 10 9 /L, and of 5 mg twice daily for patients with platelet counts between 50 to less than or equal to 75 x 10 9 /L. Study 1 Study 1 (NCT00952289) was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 309 patients who were refractory to or were not candidates for available therapy. The median age w
        end
        1466
        exact text
        NCT00952289
        start
        1455
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/indications/raw/labels-00000.json
      source file sha256
      0dba7a040bbbf460aa9f482c5b67c9f28f75fc9df775ee1e7b345b758f780e07
      source json pointer
      /results/95/clinical_studies/0
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source record id
      1c261eb0-f426-47a1-8281-62282d207644
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      c85c2b4e39e4f2ccc225800493c71369808ab267bb645d8a9ad0133c4aa2f8a4
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=0&sort=id%3Aasc
      spl effective time
      20260720
      spl set id
      f1c82580-87ae-11e0-bc84-0002a5d5c51b
    2. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-94e44041d1c2dee5a79f
      requested nct id
      NCT00952289
      primary nct id
      NCT00952289
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      5d67acd07af1c8c398ca5fc68cf908fbd85fe3fe5708f4d51270231c1dd2f93e
      payload sha256
      f48de60acce9a1ce0564172c42e6375ebcdbdbb0fd1c146be8e3b8c9fe7b5dd7
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-94e44041d1c2dee5a79f
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT00952289
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        ="_475"><li>In two prospective randomized trials, 528 higher-risk patients were randomly assigned to ruxolitinib or to either placebo (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00952289">COMFORT-I</a> [NCT00952289]) or best-available therapy (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00934544">COMFORT-II</a> [NCT00934544]).[<a href="#cit/section_5.37">37</
        end
        97503
        exact text
        NCT00952289
        start
        97492
      2. context exact
        ve randomized trials, 528 higher-risk patients were randomly assigned to ruxolitinib or to either placebo (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00952289">COMFORT-I</a> [NCT00952289]) or best-available therapy (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00934544">COMFORT-II</a> [NCT00934544]).[<a href="#cit/section_5.37">37</a>,<a href="#cit/section_5.3
        end
        97531
        exact text
        NCT00952289
        start
        97520
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/386d32d532a5041e68.html
      source file sha256
      5d67acd07af1c8c398ca5fc68cf908fbd85fe3fe5708f4d51270231c1dd2f93e
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:22:08.366806+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      04fd1210e35e69a6987a4d0936de42da25c4659d300c8be83cd5fb6547471174
      source title
      Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: September 27, 2024
        datetime
        2024-09-27T12:00:00Z
        display
        September 27, 2024

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice