Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00942331 · OUTCOME

Overall Survival (OS)

Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Cisplatin With or Without Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Advanced Urinary Tract Cancer · Source last updated 2026-06-24

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 7 years

What was measured

Overall survival time is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The median and 95% confidence intervals are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.The stratified log-rank statistic will be the primary analysis to compare the two treatment arms on OS with the stratification factors: presence of visceral metastases (no, yes) and prior chemotherapy (no, yes). In addition, the proportional hazards model will be used to assess the importance of the treatment arm adjusting on patient characteristics, stratification variables and other important covariates in predicting OS.

Analysis population: Intent to treat (ITT) analysis population

Groups in this outcome

Arm II (GCB)

Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin as in arm I. Patients also receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Arm I (GCP)

Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin IV and placebo IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive placebo IV over 30-90 minutes every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm II (GCB)252
Arm I (GCP)254

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Arm II (GCB)14.5Not reported13.516.2Not reported
Arm I (GCP)14.3Not reported12.116.2Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.72
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.06
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.1707
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.87
    statistical Comment
    Stratified log rank
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.72
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.06
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.1707
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.87
    statistical Comment
    Stratified log rank
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        13.5
        upper Limit
        16.2
        value
        14.5
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        12.1
        upper Limit
        16.2
        value
        14.3
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      252
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      254
    units
    Participants
description
Overall survival time is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The median and 95% confidence intervals are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.The stratified log-rank statistic will be the primary analysis to compare the two treatment arms on OS with the stratification factors: presence of visceral metastases (no, yes) and prior chemotherapy (no, yes). In addition, the proportional hazards model will be used to assess the importance of the treatment arm adjusting on patient characteristics, stratification variables and other important covariates in predicting OS.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin as in arm I. Patients also receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Arm II (GCB)
  2. description
    Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin IV and placebo IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive placebo IV over 30-90 minutes every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Arm I (GCP)
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Intent to treat (ITT) analysis population
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 7 years
title
Overall Survival (OS)
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice