Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00833417 · OUTCOME

Objective Response (OR) Determined by the Independent Review Facility

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Vismodegib (GDC-0449, Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor) in Patients With Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma · Source last updated 2026-05-11

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
Percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
At Baseline and once every 8 weeks thereafter (responses confirmed within ≥4 weeks) until the end of study (up to the clinical cutoff date of 26 November 2010, up to 90 weeks)

What was measured

OR=complete (CR) or partial response (PR). Metastatic-CR:Disappearance of all targets. PR:≥30% decreased sum of longest diameter (SLD) of targets compared to baseline (B). Locally advanced-Response=No progressive disease (PD) and ≥30% decreased SLD from baseline (radiography \[R\]) or ≥30% decreased SLD from B (externally visible dimension \[EVD\]) or completely resolved ulceration. CR:Response with no residual BCC on tumor biopsy (otherwise response was PR). PD:Any of ≥20% increased SLD from nadir (R or EVD), new ulceration, new lesions (R or physical exam) or non-target lesion progression by R.

Analysis population: Efficacy-evaluable population: All treated patients for whom the independent pathologist's interpretation of archival tissue or baseline biopsies was consistent with basal cell carcinoma.

Groups in this outcome

Metastatic Basal-Cell Carcinoma

Patients received vismodegib 150 mg orally once daily until disease progression; intolerable toxicity, most probably attributable to vismodegib; or withdrawal from the study.

Locally Advanced Basal-Cell Carcinoma

Patients received vismodegib 150 mg orally once daily until disease progression; intolerable toxicity, most probably attributable to vismodegib; or withdrawal from the study.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Metastatic Basal-Cell Carcinoma33
Locally Advanced Basal-Cell Carcinoma63

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Metastatic Basal-Cell Carcinoma30.3Not reported15.648.2Not reported
Locally Advanced Basal-Cell Carcinoma42.9Not reported30.556.0Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. group Description
    In the metastatic BCC cohort, a one-sided exact binomial test was conducted for the following hypotheses: Null hypothesis (Ho): objective response rate (ORR) ≤10%; Alternative hypothesis (Ha): ORR \>10%.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0011
    p Value Comment
    The hypothesis was tested at a one-sided α = 0.025 level.
    statistical Method
    Exact binomial test
  2. group Description
    In the locally advanced BCC cohort, a one-sided exact binomial test was conducted for the following hypotheses: Null hypothesis (Ho): objective response rate (ORR) ≤20%; Alternative hypothesis (Ha): ORR \>20%.
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    p Value Comment
    The hypothesis was tested at a one-sided α = 0.025 level.
    statistical Method
    Exact binomial test
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. group Description
    In the metastatic BCC cohort, a one-sided exact binomial test was conducted for the following hypotheses: Null hypothesis (Ho): objective response rate (ORR) ≤10%; Alternative hypothesis (Ha): ORR \>10%.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0011
    p Value Comment
    The hypothesis was tested at a one-sided α = 0.025 level.
    statistical Method
    Exact binomial test
  2. group Description
    In the locally advanced BCC cohort, a one-sided exact binomial test was conducted for the following hypotheses: Null hypothesis (Ho): objective response rate (ORR) ≤20%; Alternative hypothesis (Ha): ORR \>20%.
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    p Value Comment
    The hypothesis was tested at a one-sided α = 0.025 level.
    statistical Method
    Exact binomial test
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        15.6
        upper Limit
        48.2
        value
        30.3
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        30.5
        upper Limit
        56.0
        value
        42.9
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      33
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      63
    units
    Participants
description
OR=complete (CR) or partial response (PR). Metastatic-CR:Disappearance of all targets. PR:≥30% decreased sum of longest diameter (SLD) of targets compared to baseline (B). Locally advanced-Response=No progressive disease (PD) and ≥30% decreased SLD from baseline (radiography \[R\]) or ≥30% decreased SLD from B (externally visible dimension \[EVD\]) or completely resolved ulceration. CR:Response with no residual BCC on tumor biopsy (otherwise response was PR). PD:Any of ≥20% increased SLD from nadir (R or EVD), new ulceration, new lesions (R or physical exam) or non-target lesion progression by R.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Patients received vismodegib 150 mg orally once daily until disease progression; intolerable toxicity, most probably attributable to vismodegib; or withdrawal from the study.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Metastatic Basal-Cell Carcinoma
  2. description
    Patients received vismodegib 150 mg orally once daily until disease progression; intolerable toxicity, most probably attributable to vismodegib; or withdrawal from the study.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Locally Advanced Basal-Cell Carcinoma
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
Efficacy-evaluable population: All treated patients for whom the independent pathologist's interpretation of archival tissue or baseline biopsies was consistent with basal cell carcinoma.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
At Baseline and once every 8 weeks thereafter (responses confirmed within ≥4 weeks) until the end of study (up to the clinical cutoff date of 26 November 2010, up to 90 weeks)
title
Objective Response (OR) Determined by the Independent Review Facility
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice