Skip to content
← Study library

NCT00829166 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Capecitabine + Lapatinib in Participants With HER2-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2016-10-31

This is a Phase III, randomized, multicenter, international, 2-arm, open-label clinical trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with that of capecitabine + lapatinib in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Participants will be treated until disease progression (PD), unmanageable toxicity, or study termination. Once disease progression is reported, all participants will be followed for survival every 3 months until death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * HER2 status must be prospectively, centrally tested and be HER2-positive based on central laboratory assay results * Histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive breast cancer * Prior treatment for breast cancer in the adjuvant, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic setting must include both a taxane, alone or in combination with another agent, and trastuzumab, alone or in combination with another agent * Documented progression (which occur during or after most recent treatment or within 6 months after completing of adjuvant therapy) of incurable, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, defined by the investigator * Measurable and/or nonmeasurable disease; participants with central nervous system-only disease are excluded * Cardiac ejection fraction greater than or equal to (\>/=) 50 percent (%) by either echocardiogram or multi-gated acquisition scan * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 * For women of childbearing potential and men with partners of childbearing potential, agreement to use a highly effective, non-hormonal form of contraception; contraception use should continue for the duration of the study treatment and for at least 6 months after the last dose of study treatment Exclusion Criteria: * History of treatment with trastuzumab emtansine * Prior treatment with lapatinib or capecitabine * Peripheral neuropathy of Grade \>/= 3 per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 3.0 * History of other malignancy within the last 5 years, except for appropriately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, Stage 1 uterine cancer, synchronous or previously diagnosed HER2-positive breast cancer, or cancers with a similar curative outcome as those mentioned above * History of receiving any anti-cancer drug/biologic or investigational treatment within 21 days prior to randomization except hormone therapy, which could be given up to 7 days prior to randomization; recovery of treatment-related toxicity consistent with other eligibility criteria * History of radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization * Brain metastases that are untreated, symptomatic, or require therapy to control symptoms, as well as any history of radiation, surgery, or other therapy, including steroids, to control symptoms from brain metastases within 2 months (60 days) of randomization * History of symptomatic congestive heart failure or serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring treatment * History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months of randomization * Current dyspnea at rest due to complications of advanced malignancy or current requirement for continuous oxygen therapy * Current severe, uncontrolled systemic disease (for example, clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease) * Pregnancy or lactation * Current known active infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus * Presence of conditions that could affect gastrointestinal absorption: Malabsorption syndrome, resection of the small bowel or stomach, and ulcerative colitis * History of intolerance (such as Grade 3-4 infusion reaction) to trastuzumab * Known hypersensitivity to 5-fluorouracil or known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency * Current treatment with sorivudine or its chemically related analogs, such as brivudine
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Participants will receive trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion over 30-90 minutes on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle until disease progression (PD) (as assessed by the investigator), unmanageable toxicity, or study termination.
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Trastuzumab emtansine
    label
    Trastuzumab emtansine
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. description
    Participants will receive lapatinib 1250 mg (five 250 mg tablets) orally once daily during each 21-day cycle + capecitabine 1000 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day treatment cycle until PD (as assessed by the investigator), unmanageable toxicity, or study termination. Eligible participants will cross over to receive trastuzumab emtansine if second interim analysis demonstrates statistically significant overall survival benefit in favor of trastuzumab emtansine.
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Lapatinib
    2. Drug: Capecitabine
    label
    Lapatinib + Capecitabine
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Trastuzumab emtansine
    description
    Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion over 30-90 minutes on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle.
    name
    Trastuzumab emtansine
    other Names
    1. T-DM1
    2. Trastuzumab-MCC-DM1
    3. RO5304020
    type
    DRUG
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Lapatinib + Capecitabine
    description
    Lapatinib 1250 mg (five 250 mg tablets) orally once daily during each 21-day cycle.
    name
    Lapatinib
    other Names
    1. Tykerb
    2. Tyverb
    type
    DRUG
  3. arm Group Labels
    1. Lapatinib + Capecitabine
    description
    Capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day treatment cycle.
    name
    Capecitabine
    other Names
    1. Xeloda
    type
    DRUG
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
991
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    PD was assessed by an IRC using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as target lesions (TLs) and recorded at baseline. TLs should be selected on the basis of their size (those with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements either by imaging or clinically. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). All other lesions (or sites of disease) should be identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline. PD for TLs was defined as greater than or equal to (\>/=) 20 percent (%) increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Percentage of Participants with PD by IRC or death from any cause was reported.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  2. description
    Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs (on the basis of their size and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements either by imaging or clinically) and recorded at baseline. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD. All other lesions were identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline. PD for TLs: \>/= 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PD for non-TLs: appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD by IRC or death from any cause (whichever occurred earlier). The median duration of PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
    measure
    Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an IRC (Co-primary Endpoint)
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  3. description
    The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported. The results are reported from second interim analysis, which deemed to be the confirmatory.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Died: Second Interim Analysis
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)
  4. description
    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. The median duration of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. The results are reported from second interim analysis, which deemed to be the confirmatory.
    measure
    Overall Survival: Second Interim Analysis (Co-primary Endpoint)
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)
  5. description
    The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported. The results reported are from the final analysis. The final analysis is descriptive.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Died: Final Analysis
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)
  6. description
    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. The median duration of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. The results reported are from the final analysis. The final analysis is descriptive.
    measure
    Overall Survival: Final Analysis
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)
  7. description
    1 year survival was defined as the percentage of participants alive 1 year after starting treatment. The results reported are from the final analysis.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Year 1
    time Frame
    Year 1
  8. description
    2 year survival was defined as the percentage of participants alive 2 years after starting treatment. The results reported are from the final analysis.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Year 2
    time Frame
    Year 2
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    PD was assessed by the investigator using modified RECIST. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs and recorded at baseline. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD. PD for TLs was defined as \>/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD by Investigator was reported.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the Investigator
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  2. description
    Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs and recorded at baseline. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD. PD for TLs was defined as \>/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to first documented PD by Investigator or death from any cause (whichever occurred earlier). The median duration of PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
    measure
    PFS as Assessed by the Investigator
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  3. description
    Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST. OR was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs and recorded at baseline. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD. For TLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs and a PR was defined as \>/= 30% decrease in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD. For non-TLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all non-TLs and a PR was defined as the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs. Confirmation of response at a consecutive tumor assessment at least 4 weeks apart was required. Participants without a post-baseline tumor assessment were considered non-responders. The percentage of participants with CR or PR by IRC was reported. The 95% CI was computed using Blyth-Still Casella exact CI method.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by an IRC
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  4. description
    Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST. DOR was defined as the time from first documented OR to first documented PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred earlier. OR was defined as a CR or PR determined on 2 consecutive tumor assessments at least 4 weeks apart. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as \>/=30% decrease in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD; and PD was defined as \>/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For non-TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all non-TLs; PR was defined as the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs; and PD was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
    measure
    Duration of Objective Response (DOR) as Assessed by an IRC
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  5. description
    Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST. Participants were considered as experienced clinical benefit if they had an OR or maintained stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months from randomization. OR: CR or PR determined on 2 consecutive tumor assessments \>/=4 weeks apart. For TLs, CR: disappearance of all TLs; PR: \>/=30% decrease in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD; PD: \>/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions; and SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. For non-TLs, CR: disappearance of all non-TLs; PR/SD: persistence of 1 or more non-TLs; and PD: appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Participants without a post-baseline tumor assessment were considered non-responders. The 95% CI was computed using Blyth-Still Casella exact CI method.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Assessed by an IRC
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  6. description
    Treatment failure was defined as discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including PD (per investigator review), treatment toxicity, or death from any cause. For "Lapatinib + Capecitabine" arm, a participant was considered as treatment failure only if both drugs were discontinued. For TLs, PD was defined as \>/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For non-TLs, PD was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Percentage of participants with treatment failure was reported.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  7. description
    Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from randomization to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including PD (per investigator review), treatment toxicity, or death from any cause. For "Lapatinib + Capecitabine" arm, a participant was considered as treatment failure only if both drugs were discontinued with treatment failure date as the later of the 2 discontinuation dates. For TLs, PD was defined as \>/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For non-TLs, PD was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. The median time to treatment failure was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
    measure
    Time to Treatment Failure
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  8. description
    Symptom progression was defined as the documentation of a \>/= 5-point decrease from baseline in the scoring of responses as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-for participants with Breast Cancer (FACT-B) questionnaire with the Trial Outcomes Index-Physical/Functional/Breast (TOI-PFB) subscale. The FACT-B TOI-PFB subscale contained 24 items from 3 subsections of the FACT-B questionnaire: Physical well-being, functional well-being, and additional concerns for breast cancer participants (breast cancer subscale \[BCS\]). All items in the questionnaire were rated by the participant on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). The total score ranged from 0 to 96 with higher score indicating better perceived quality of life. The percentage of participants with symptom progression was reported.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Symptom Progression
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
  9. description
    Time to symptom progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documentation of a \>/= 5-point decrease from baseline in the scoring of responses as measured by the FACT-B questionnaire with the TOI-PFB subscale. The FACT-B TOI-PFB subscale contained 24 items from 3 subsections of the FACT-B questionnaire: Physical well-being, functional well-being, and additional concerns for breast cancer participants (BCS). All items in the questionnaire were rated by the participant on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). The total score ranged from 0 to 96 with higher score indicating better perceived quality of life. The median time to symptom progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
    measure
    Time to Symptom Progression
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
Full study description
brief Summary
This is a Phase III, randomized, multicenter, international, 2-arm, open-label clinical trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with that of capecitabine + lapatinib in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Participants will be treated until disease progression (PD), unmanageable toxicity, or study termination. Once disease progression is reported, all participants will be followed for survival every 3 months until death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Dieras V, Miles D, Verma S, Pegram M, Welslau M, Baselga J, Krop IE, Blackwell K, Hoersch S, Xu J, Green M, Gianni L. Trastuzumab emtansine versus capecitabine plus lapatinib in patients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (EMILIA): a descriptive analysis of final overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):732-742. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30312-1. Epub 2017 May 16.
    pmid
    28526536
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, Pegram M, Oh DY, Dieras V, Guardino E, Fang L, Lu MW, Olsen S, Blackwell K; EMILIA Study Group. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1783-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209124. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
    pmid
    23020162
    type
    DERIVED
  3. citation
    Scott AM, Wolchok JD, Old LJ. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 22;12(4):278-87. doi: 10.1038/nrc3236.
    pmid
    22437872
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-63c1c22a085fdec2a1f0
      requested nct id
      NCT00829166
      primary nct id
      NCT00829166
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=100&sort=id%3Aasc
      source record id
      27ab596b-f625-4866-b65a-54508ffce760
      source file sha256
      fc39a8c5cf96bf95ca20b85578140167b66b2741f7d9217f500d9ba0847ac058
      payload sha256
      746912cfd99a7e8affe4e562fce17d18dfb53e3cb19e3746226ea3424da13b8a
      payload
      application numbers
      1. BLA125427
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-63c1c22a085fdec2a1f0
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT00829166
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        14 CLINICAL STUDIES 14.1 Metastatic Breast Cancer The efficacy of KADCYLA was evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial (EMILIA) (NCT00829166) of 991 patients with HER2-positive, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Prior taxane and trastuzumab-based therapy was required before
        end
        156
        exact text
        NCT00829166
        start
        145
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/indications/raw/labels-00100.json
      source file sha256
      fc39a8c5cf96bf95ca20b85578140167b66b2741f7d9217f500d9ba0847ac058
      source json pointer
      /results/39/clinical_studies/0
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source record id
      27ab596b-f625-4866-b65a-54508ffce760
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      20828029fbf687e7eb0418d22936d56579c04e1d62ea3b55a1a5f87acca65c97
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=100&sort=id%3Aasc
      spl effective time
      20260401
      spl set id
      23f3c1f4-0fc8-4804-a9e3-04cf25dd302e
    2. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-7cd6ea968b69af532464
      requested nct id
      NCT00829166
      primary nct id
      NCT00829166
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      862f78faa9e4cbedc19f9ffcaeba97e029ba51b72bb3b81fc67aa8b6adf96904
      payload sha256
      7cba26be078710ddebbb1074280d657818f32dafc4be95fcce4a347d83c91592
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-7cd6ea968b69af532464
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT00829166
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        > <p id="_1510" tabindex="-1">Evidence (T-DM1):</p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_1511"><li>The phase III <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00829166">EMILIA</a> or TDM4370g study (NCT00829166) was a randomized open-label trial that enrolled 991 patients with HER2-overexpressing, unresectable, locally advanc
        end
        630254
        exact text
        NCT00829166
        start
        630243
      2. context exact
        dence (T-DM1):</p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_1511"><li>The phase III <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00829166">EMILIA</a> or TDM4370g study (NCT00829166) was a randomized open-label trial that enrolled 991 patients with HER2-overexpressing, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who were pre
        end
        630297
        exact text
        NCT00829166
        start
        630286
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/29bf1e5a1d739974ed.html
      source file sha256
      862f78faa9e4cbedc19f9ffcaeba97e029ba51b72bb3b81fc67aa8b6adf96904
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:21:35.419733+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      536430925e3b0008edd3fb69a869d5645bd6b6dc5c84c21ddf1b3e24f089874c
      source title
      Breast Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: April 25, 2025
        datetime
        2025-04-25T12:00:00Z
        display
        April 25, 2025

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice