Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00743262 · OUTCOME

Short-term Feasibility Provox Vega 22.5 French

Short-term Clinical Feasibility of the New Provox Vega 22.5 Voice Prosthesis · Source last updated 2023-07-25

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
Patients
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
3 weeks

What was measured

Number of participants in whom the voice prosthesis was considered feasible in the short-term with regards to clinical and technical aspects as judged by patient and investigator.

Groups in this outcome

Provox Vega 22.5 French

A group of laryngectomized Provox ActiValve users tested the Provox Vega 22.5 French voice prosthesis for 3 weeks.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Provox Vega 22.5 French15

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Patients · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Provox Vega 22.5 French15Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        15
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      15
    units
    Participants
description
Number of participants in whom the voice prosthesis was considered feasible in the short-term with regards to clinical and technical aspects as judged by patient and investigator.
groups
  1. description
    A group of laryngectomized Provox ActiValve users tested the Provox Vega 22.5 French voice prosthesis for 3 weeks.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Provox Vega 22.5 French
param Type
NUMBER
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
3 weeks
title
Short-term Feasibility Provox Vega 22.5 French
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Patients

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice