NCT00721123 · OUTCOME
Participants Showing Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptoms Over Time, Through 264 Weeks
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- NUMBER
- Unit
- Percentage of Participants
- Interval / dispersion
- Not reported
- Time frame
- through 264 Weeks
What was measured
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) established certain criteria to measure improvement in rheumatoid arthritis symptoms that include tender or swollen joint counts and five other criteria, including acute phase reactant, patient assessment, physician assessment, pain scale, and disability/functional questionnaire. Clinical trials use the ACR Score, based on those criteria, as a standard for reporting different degrees of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis symptoms. Scores on the ACR scale may be up to ACR100 because the number after "ACR" is the percent of improvement in tender or swollen joint counts as well as in three of the other five criteria. Clinical trials determine the percentage of participants who achieve that score - that percentage of improvement.
Analysis population: All exposure population, which includes all participants who entered the study and received at least one dose of tocilizumab, with a score at the given time point.
Groups in this outcome
Week 24
Participants with scores at 24 weeks post-baseline.
Week 48
Participants with scores at 48 weeks post-baseline.
Week 108
Participants with scores at 108 weeks post-baseline.
Week 156
Participants with scores at 156 weeks post-baseline.
Week 204
Participants with scores at 204 weeks post-baseline.
Week 264
Participants with scores at 264 weeks post-baseline.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Week 24 | 522 |
| Week 48 | 480 |
| Week 108 | 422 |
| Week 156 | 413 |
| Week 204 | 387 |
| Week 264 | 367 |
Reported measurements
ACR20
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 24 | 63.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 48 | 76.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 108 | 81.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 156 | 83.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 204 | 82.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 264 | 83.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
ACR50
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 24 | 41.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 48 | 50.6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 108 | 58.1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 156 | 59.6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 204 | 62.5 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 264 | 67.8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
ACR70
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 24 | 17.4 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 48 | 27.1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 108 | 38.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 156 | 41.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 204 | 42.1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 264 | 45.8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
ACR90
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 24 | 4.8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 48 | 5.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 108 | 11.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 156 | 15.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 204 | 16.8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Week 264 | 19.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 63.2
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 76.0
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 81.2
- group Id
- OG003
- value
- 83.3
- group Id
- OG004
- value
- 82.2
- group Id
- OG005
- value
- 83.9
- title
- ACR20
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 41.2
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 50.6
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 58.1
- group Id
- OG003
- value
- 59.6
- group Id
- OG004
- value
- 62.5
- group Id
- OG005
- value
- 67.8
- title
- ACR50
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 17.4
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 27.1
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 38.2
- group Id
- OG003
- value
- 41.9
- group Id
- OG004
- value
- 42.1
- group Id
- OG005
- value
- 45.8
- title
- ACR70
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 4.8
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 5.2
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 11.3
- group Id
- OG003
- value
- 15.3
- group Id
- OG004
- value
- 16.8
- group Id
- OG005
- value
- 19.3
- title
- ACR90
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 522
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 480
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 422
- group Id
- OG003
- value
- 413
- group Id
- OG004
- value
- 387
- group Id
- OG005
- value
- 367
- units
- Participants
- description
- The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) established certain criteria to measure improvement in rheumatoid arthritis symptoms that include tender or swollen joint counts and five other criteria, including acute phase reactant, patient assessment, physician assessment, pain scale, and disability/functional questionnaire. Clinical trials use the ACR Score, based on those criteria, as a standard for reporting different degrees of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis symptoms. Scores on the ACR scale may be up to ACR100 because the number after "ACR" is the percent of improvement in tender or swollen joint counts as well as in three of the other five criteria. Clinical trials determine the percentage of participants who achieve that score - that percentage of improvement.
- groups
- description
- Participants with scores at 24 weeks post-baseline.
- id
- OG000
- title
- Week 24
- description
- Participants with scores at 48 weeks post-baseline.
- id
- OG001
- title
- Week 48
- description
- Participants with scores at 108 weeks post-baseline.
- id
- OG002
- title
- Week 108
- description
- Participants with scores at 156 weeks post-baseline.
- id
- OG003
- title
- Week 156
- description
- Participants with scores at 204 weeks post-baseline.
- id
- OG004
- title
- Week 204
- description
- Participants with scores at 264 weeks post-baseline.
- id
- OG005
- title
- Week 264
- param Type
- NUMBER
- population Description
- All exposure population, which includes all participants who entered the study and received at least one dose of tocilizumab, with a score at the given time point.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- through 264 Weeks
- title
- Participants Showing Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptoms Over Time, Through 264 Weeks
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Percentage of Participants
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle