Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00556322 · OUTCOME

Time to Deterioration in the TOI

A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) · Source last updated 2015-02-23

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
weeks
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline, Weeks 3 and 6, Every 3 Weeks until Week 48 and Every 12 Weeks until Disease Progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 52 months

What was measured

TOI is defined as the sum of the scores of the PW, FWB, and LCS of the FACT-L instrument. Trial Outcome Index measures the physical functioning of participants. Time to deterioration in TOI is defined as time from randomization until the earlier of a clinically meaningful decline from baseline in TOI or death on study. The clinically meaningful decline used to determine deterioration in TOI was ≥6- point decline from baseline. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis.

Analysis population: FAS population; Only participants with both a baseline FACT-L assessment and a subsequent FACT-L assessment were included in the analysis.

Groups in this outcome

Comparator

Participants received either pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death or docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Choice of comparator was left to the discretion of the investigator in countries where both treatments are registered to use and are commercially available for second line use (otherwise, docetaxel was administered), assigning the participant to either comparator depending upon the medical needs of the participant. Participants were required to receive concomitant treatment therapy as indicated in the product label.

Erlotinib

Participants received erlotinib, 150 mg, administered orally as a tablet, once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Comparator165
Erlotinib158

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in weeks · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Comparator9.3Not reported7.613.0Not reported
Erlotinib6.7Not reported6.19.4Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.95
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.66
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.1063
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.25
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.95
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.66
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.1063
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.25
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        7.6
        upper Limit
        13.0
        value
        9.3
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        6.1
        upper Limit
        9.4
        value
        6.7
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      165
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      158
    units
    Participants
description
TOI is defined as the sum of the scores of the PW, FWB, and LCS of the FACT-L instrument. Trial Outcome Index measures the physical functioning of participants. Time to deterioration in TOI is defined as time from randomization until the earlier of a clinically meaningful decline from baseline in TOI or death on study. The clinically meaningful decline used to determine deterioration in TOI was ≥6- point decline from baseline. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received either pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death or docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Choice of comparator was left to the discretion of the investigator in countries where both treatments are registered to use and are commercially available for second line use (otherwise, docetaxel was administered), assigning the participant to either comparator depending upon the medical needs of the participant. Participants were required to receive concomitant treatment therapy as indicated in the product label.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Comparator
  2. description
    Participants received erlotinib, 150 mg, administered orally as a tablet, once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Erlotinib
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
FAS population; Only participants with both a baseline FACT-L assessment and a subsequent FACT-L assessment were included in the analysis.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 3 and 6, Every 3 Weeks until Week 48 and Every 12 Weeks until Disease Progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 52 months
title
Time to Deterioration in the TOI
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
weeks

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice