TriangleNCT00556322 · OUTCOME
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Progression Using FACT-L
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- NUMBER
- Unit
- percentage of participants
- Interval / dispersion
- Not reported
- Time frame
- Baseline, Weeks 3 and 6, Every 3 Weeks until Week 48 and Every 12 Weeks until Disease Progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 52 months
What was measured
Participants' responses on the FACT-L were scored according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system manual. Time to symptom progression is the time from randomization until the earlier of a clinically meaningful decline from baseline in LCS score, or death on study. A change in 2 to 3 points on the LCS is a clinically meaningful change. Meaningful declines in scores as measured by the FACIT instruments have been found to be larger than improvements. Thus, deterioration in disease-related symptoms was defined by the upper bound (3 points) of the range of clinically meaningful change. However, participants who demonstrated early lung cancer progression demonstrated smaller changes from baseline score on the LCS. Therefore, the clinically meaningful decline that was used to determine progression of symptoms in this study was at least 1.5-point decline in LCS score from baseline.
Analysis population: FAS population; Only participants with both a baseline FACT-L assessment and a subsequent FACT-L assessment were included in the analysis.
Groups in this outcome
Comparator
Participants received either pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death or docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Choice of comparator was left to the discretion of the investigator in countries where both treatments are registered to use and are commercially available for second line use (otherwise, docetaxel was administered), assigning the participant to either comparator depending upon the medical needs of the participant. Participants were required to receive concomitant treatment therapy as indicated in the product label.
Erlotinib
Participants received erlotinib, 150 mg, administered orally as a tablet, once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Comparator | 165 |
| Erlotinib | 158 |
Reported measurements
Source class 1
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator | 60.6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Erlotinib | 62.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 60.6
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 62.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 165
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 158
- units
- Participants
- description
- Participants' responses on the FACT-L were scored according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system manual. Time to symptom progression is the time from randomization until the earlier of a clinically meaningful decline from baseline in LCS score, or death on study. A change in 2 to 3 points on the LCS is a clinically meaningful change. Meaningful declines in scores as measured by the FACIT instruments have been found to be larger than improvements. Thus, deterioration in disease-related symptoms was defined by the upper bound (3 points) of the range of clinically meaningful change. However, participants who demonstrated early lung cancer progression demonstrated smaller changes from baseline score on the LCS. Therefore, the clinically meaningful decline that was used to determine progression of symptoms in this study was at least 1.5-point decline in LCS score from baseline.
- groups
- description
- Participants received either pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death or docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Choice of comparator was left to the discretion of the investigator in countries where both treatments are registered to use and are commercially available for second line use (otherwise, docetaxel was administered), assigning the participant to either comparator depending upon the medical needs of the participant. Participants were required to receive concomitant treatment therapy as indicated in the product label.
- id
- OG000
- title
- Comparator
- description
- Participants received erlotinib, 150 mg, administered orally as a tablet, once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death.
- id
- OG001
- title
- Erlotinib
- param Type
- NUMBER
- population Description
- FAS population; Only participants with both a baseline FACT-L assessment and a subsequent FACT-L assessment were included in the analysis.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Baseline, Weeks 3 and 6, Every 3 Weeks until Week 48 and Every 12 Weeks until Disease Progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 52 months
- title
- Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Progression Using FACT-L
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- percentage of participants
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice