Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00531453 · OUTCOME

Percent of Particpants Achieving Overall Combined Complete Response (CR) Following Induction

A Study to Evaluate Two Different Regimens of VELCADE in Combination With Dexamethasone, Thalidomide and Cyclophosphamide (VDT vs VDTC) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2012-01-26

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
all data included in clinical database as of 10 April 2009

What was measured

Percent of Particpants Achieving Overall combined complete response (CR w/normalized serum κ:λ ratio + CR + near complete response (nCR)) following induction therapy. * CR criteria: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. * κ:λ ratio: normal free light chain (FLC) ratio * nCR criteria: positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow.

Analysis population: The response-evaluable population is defined as all subjects who have measurable disease at baseline, receive at least 1 dose of any study drug and have at least 1 post-baseline response assessment. The response-evaluable population comprises 49 subjects in the VDT treatment group and 48 subjects in the VDTC group.

Groups in this outcome

Three Drug Regimen (VDT)

bortezomib, dexamethasone, and thalidomide

Four Drug Regimen (VDTC)

bortezomib, dexamethasone, thalidomide, and cyclophosphamide

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Three Drug Regimen (VDT)49
Four Drug Regimen (VDTC)48

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Three Drug Regimen (VDT)51Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Four Drug Regimen (VDTC)44Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        51
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        44
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      49
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      48
    units
    Participants
description
Percent of Particpants Achieving Overall combined complete response (CR w/normalized serum κ:λ ratio + CR + near complete response (nCR)) following induction therapy. * CR criteria: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. * κ:λ ratio: normal free light chain (FLC) ratio * nCR criteria: positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow.
groups
  1. description
    bortezomib, dexamethasone, and thalidomide
    id
    OG000
    title
    Three Drug Regimen (VDT)
  2. description
    bortezomib, dexamethasone, thalidomide, and cyclophosphamide
    id
    OG001
    title
    Four Drug Regimen (VDTC)
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
The response-evaluable population is defined as all subjects who have measurable disease at baseline, receive at least 1 dose of any study drug and have at least 1 post-baseline response assessment. The response-evaluable population comprises 49 subjects in the VDT treatment group and 48 subjects in the VDTC group.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
all data included in clinical database as of 10 April 2009
title
Percent of Particpants Achieving Overall Combined Complete Response (CR) Following Induction
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice