Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00322842 · OUTCOME

Increase in Peripheral Blood (PB) CD34+ Cells From Steady-state Hematopoiesis to Pre-leukapheresis in G-CSF+Plerixafor Treated Participants Compared to Historical Controls Treated With G-CSF Alone or Chemotherapy and G-CSF

Treatment With AMD3100 (Plerixafor) in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma Patients · Source last updated 2014-03-13

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
Not reported
Unit
Not reported
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
up to day 8

What was measured

A comparison of the effectiveness in mobilizing peripheral blood CD34+ cells between this study's treatment regimen (G-CSF plus plerixafor) to other treatment options: G-CSF alone, and chemotherapy with G-CSF.

Analysis population: Analysis was not performed. Historical data was not available.

Groups in this outcome

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Participants with NHL were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 µg/kg/day for 4 days. Plerixafor 240 µg/kg was given the evening of day 4 and G-CSF given the next morning followed by apheresis. Evening doses of plerixafor and morning doses of G-CSF followed by apheresis continued for up to a maximum of 5 aphereses or until ≥ 5\*10\^6 CD34+ cells/kg were collected.

Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Participants with MM were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 µg/kg/day for 4 days. Plerixafor 240 µg/kg was given the evening of day 4 and G-CSF given the next morning followed by apheresis. Evening doses of plerixafor and morning doses of G-CSF followed by apheresis continued for up to a maximum of 5 aphereses or until ≥ 5\*10\^6 CD34+ cells/kg were collected.

All Participants

Not reported

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)0
Multiple Myeloma (MM)0
All Participants0

Reported measurements

No numerical measurement classes were posted for this outcome. Missing is not zero.

Complete source fields
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      0
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      0
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      0
    units
    Participants
description
A comparison of the effectiveness in mobilizing peripheral blood CD34+ cells between this study's treatment regimen (G-CSF plus plerixafor) to other treatment options: G-CSF alone, and chemotherapy with G-CSF.
groups
  1. description
    Participants with NHL were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 µg/kg/day for 4 days. Plerixafor 240 µg/kg was given the evening of day 4 and G-CSF given the next morning followed by apheresis. Evening doses of plerixafor and morning doses of G-CSF followed by apheresis continued for up to a maximum of 5 aphereses or until ≥ 5\*10\^6 CD34+ cells/kg were collected.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
  2. description
    Participants with MM were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 µg/kg/day for 4 days. Plerixafor 240 µg/kg was given the evening of day 4 and G-CSF given the next morning followed by apheresis. Evening doses of plerixafor and morning doses of G-CSF followed by apheresis continued for up to a maximum of 5 aphereses or until ≥ 5\*10\^6 CD34+ cells/kg were collected.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Multiple Myeloma (MM)
  3. id
    OG002
    title
    All Participants
population Description
Analysis was not performed. Historical data was not available.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
up to day 8
title
Increase in Peripheral Blood (PB) CD34+ Cells From Steady-state Hematopoiesis to Pre-leukapheresis in G-CSF+Plerixafor Treated Participants Compared to Historical Controls Treated With G-CSF Alone or Chemotherapy and G-CSF
type
SECONDARY

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice