NCT00226915 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Trial of Tri-weekly TJ Versus Weekly TJ for Stage II-IV Mullerian Carcinoma

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase: PHASE3
Status at capture: COMPLETED
Registry last update: 2020-02-17

The purpose of the study is to compare progression-free survival of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin vs weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

No posted result sections were captured. Registered plans do not establish that a treatment works.

Who could take part

eligibility Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically confirmed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer * No prior chemotherapy * Age: 20 and more * Performance status: ECOG 0-3 * 1\) Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm3 2) Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 3) Bilirubin less than 1.5mg/dL 4) SGOT less than 100 IU/l 5) Serum creatinine less than 1.5mg/dL * Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with ovarian borderline tumor * Patients who have any evidence of the other cancer present within the last 5 years with the exception of carcinoma in situ or intramucosal cancer that is curable with local therapy * Patients with active infection or uncontrolled diabetes * Patients with unstable angina, or those who have had a myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, or patients with serious arrythmia that requires medication * Patients who have a history of hypersensitivity to polyoxyethylated castor oil (Cremophor EL)
healthy Volunteers: false
minimum Age: 20 Years
sex: FEMALE
std Ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT

Treatment arms and interventions

arm Groups

description
Drug: Paclitaxel 180mg/m2＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles
intervention Names
Drug: Paclitaxel+Carboplatin
label
1
type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
description
Drug: Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly ＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles
intervention Names
Drug: Paclitaxel+Carboplatin
label
2
type
EXPERIMENTAL

interventions

arm Group Labels
1
description
Paclitaxel 180mg/m2＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles
name
Paclitaxel+Carboplatin
type
DRUG
arm Group Labels
2
description
Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly ＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles
name
Paclitaxel+Carboplatin
type
DRUG

Study design

allocation

RANDOMIZED

intervention Model

PARALLEL

masking Info

masking: NONE

primary Purpose

TREATMENT

Enrollment

count: 637
type: ACTUAL

Registered outcome plans (not posted results)

primary Outcomes

description
From the registration date, the earliest observed event from any of the following events 1. Death from any cause death date 2. The date of the first diagnostic imaging examination that confirmed exacerbation and recurrence. Clinical exacerbation diagnosis date if not based on diagnostic imaging 3. If none of the above events are observed, the most recent outpatient consultation date / in hospital
measure
Progression Free Suvaival
time Frame
During the protocol treatment then 18 months from the last day of the protocol treatment

secondary Outcomes

description
The period from the registration date to the date of death due to any cause. In the case of survivors, the final surviving confirmation date will be censored. In the case of untraceable cases, the last surviving confirmation date before tracking becomes impossible will be censored.
measure
Overall Survival
time Frame
During the protocol treatment then 18 months from the last day of the protocol treatment
description
QOL assessed by FACT-Taxane(Version 4A)
measure
QOL
time Frame
During the protocol treatment then 18 months
description
Adverse Event assessed by CTC(Version 2.0 Japanese version)
measure
Adverse Event
time Frame
During the protocol treatment then 18 months

Full study description

brief Summary: The purpose of the study is to compare progression-free survival of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin vs weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
detailed Description: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to residual disease 1 cm or less vs more than 1cm, stage II vs III vs IV, and histology (clear cell or mucinous vs. serous or others). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV over 60 minutes on day 1 for 6-9 cycles. Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 1 hour days 1, 8, and 15 and carboplatin IV over 60 minutes on day 1 for 6-9 cycles. In both arms, cycles repeat 6 cycles every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additional 3 cycles are given if clinical partial or complete response after 6 cycles. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total 600 patients (300 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years. Assuming median progression-free survivals of 16 months and 21 months and a recruitment period of 3 years this can be achieved by recruiting 600 patients designed to have 80 % detect to a difference between the two arms at the two-sided 5% level of statistical significance.

Source references

references

citation
McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, Clarke-Pearson DL, Davidson M. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jan 4;334(1):1-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601043340101.
pmid
7494563
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1431-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081. Epub 2003 Feb 13.
pmid
12668651
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Ngan HY, Sideri M, Pecorelli S. Carcinoma of the ovary. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2001;6(1):107-38. No abstract available.
pmid
11385772
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Strnad CM, Grosh WW, Baxter J, Burnett LS, Jones HW 3rd, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown primary site in women. A distinctive subset of adenocarcinoma. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Aug 1;111(3):213-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-3-213.
pmid
2502058
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Feuer GA, Shevchuk M, Calanog A. Normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;73(5 Pt 1):786-92.
pmid
2704507
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, James K, Cassidy J, Mangioni C, Simonsen E, Stuart G, Kaye S, Vergote I, Blom R, Grimshaw R, Atkinson RJ, Swenerton KD, Trope C, Nardi M, Kaern J, Tumolo S, Timmers P, Roy JA, Lhoas F, Lindvall B, Bacon M, Birt A, Andersen JE, Zee B, Paul J, Baron B, Pecorelli S. Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 May 3;92(9):699-708. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.9.699.
pmid
10793106
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Muggia FM, Braly PS, Brady MF, Sutton G, Niemann TH, Lentz SL, Alvarez RD, Kucera PR, Small JM. Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):106-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.106.
pmid
10623700
type
BACKGROUND
citation
International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Aug 17;360(9332):505-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09738-6.
pmid
12241653
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Alberts DS, Green S, Hannigan EV, O'Toole R, Stock-Novack D, Anderson P, Surwit EA, Malvlya VK, Nahhas WA, Jolles CJ. Improved therapeutic index of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide: final report by the Southwest Oncology Group of a phase III randomized trial in stages III and IV ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992 May;10(5):706-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.5.706.
pmid
1569443
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Eisenhauer EA, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Swenerton KD, Gianni L, Myles J, van der Burg ME, Kerr I, Vermorken JB, Buser K, Colombo N, et al. European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;12(12):2654-66. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2654.
pmid
7989941
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Bois AD, Lueck HJ, Meier W, Moebus V, Costa SD, Bauknecht T, Richter B, Warm M, Schroeder W, Olbricht S, Nitz U, Jackisch C. Cisplatin/Paclitaxel Vs Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer: Update of an Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group Trial. American Society of Clinical Oncology 18:356a(Abstract 1374), 1999.
type
BACKGROUND
citation
Ozols R, Bundy B, Fowler J, Clarke-Pearson D, Mannel R, Hartenbach E , Baergen R. Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin (CIS)/Paclitaxel (PAC) Versus Carboplatin (CARBO)/PAC in Optimal Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (OC): A Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial (GOG 158). American Society of Clinical Oncology 18:356a(Abstract.1373), 1999.
type
BACKGROUND