Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00113763 · OUTCOME

Progression-free Survival Time

Evaluating Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer · Source last updated 2022-11-07

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
weeks
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.

What was measured

Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Analysis population: Intention-to-treat (ITT)

Groups in this outcome

Panitumumab Plus BSC

Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug.

BSC Alone

Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Panitumumab Plus BSC231
BSC Alone232

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in weeks · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Panitumumab Plus BSC8.0Not reported7.98.4Not reported
BSC Alone7.3Not reported7.17.7Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. group Description
    Null hypothesis was no difference between treatment groups
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    statistical Comment
    Stratified by baseline IVRS ECOG performance status and geographic region
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. group Description
    Null hypothesis was no difference between treatment groups
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER_LEGACY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    statistical Comment
    Stratified by baseline IVRS ECOG performance status and geographic region
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        7.9
        upper Limit
        8.4
        value
        8.0
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        7.1
        upper Limit
        7.7
        value
        7.3
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      231
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      232
    units
    Participants
description
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Panitumumab Plus BSC
  2. description
    Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy.
    id
    OG001
    title
    BSC Alone
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Intention-to-treat (ITT)
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.
title
Progression-free Survival Time
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
weeks

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice