Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00090051 · OUTCOME

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

FCR Versus FC Alone in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in Relapsed Patients · Source last updated 2017-08-01

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Days
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Mean observation time at time of analysis was approximately 26 months

What was measured

Progression-free survival as assessed by the IRC was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression, relapse after response, or death from any cause, whichever came first. Patients without a PFS event were censored at their last tumor assessment date.

Analysis population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population was comprised of all patients randomized in the study, irrespective of whether they received treatment or not.

Groups in this outcome

Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide (FC)

Fludarabine+cyclophosphamide (FC) intravenously for a total of 6 treatment cycles at intervals of 28 days. Fludarabine: 25 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 2, 3 for 6 cycles. Cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 2, 3 for 6 cycles.

Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide+Rituximab (FCR)

Rituximab and FC intravenously for a total of 6 treatment cycles at intervals of 28 days. Cycle 1: rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on Day 1; fludarabine 25 mg/m² IV on Days 2, 3, 4; cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² IV on Days 2, 3, 4. Cycles 2-6: rituximab 500 mg/m² IV on Day 1; fludarabine 25 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 2, 3; cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 2, 3.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide (FC)276
Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide+Rituximab (FCR)276

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Days · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide (FC)660Not reported556735Not reported
Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide+Rituximab (FCR)813Not reported670947Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.60
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.96
    estimate Comment
    The hazard ratio was estimated using Cox regression. The hazard ratio is relative to the fludarabine+cyclophosphamide(FC) group.
    group Description
    The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the 2 treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was that progression-free survival was longer in the fludarabine+cyclophosphamide+rituximab (FCR) group.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.0218
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.76
    statistical Comment
    non-stratified
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.60
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.96
    estimate Comment
    The hazard ratio was estimated using Cox regression. The hazard ratio is relative to the fludarabine+cyclophosphamide(FC) group.
    group Description
    The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the 2 treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was that progression-free survival was longer in the fludarabine+cyclophosphamide+rituximab (FCR) group.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.0218
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.76
    statistical Comment
    non-stratified
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        556
        upper Limit
        735
        value
        660
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        670
        upper Limit
        947
        value
        813
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      276
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      276
    units
    Participants
description
Progression-free survival as assessed by the IRC was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression, relapse after response, or death from any cause, whichever came first. Patients without a PFS event were censored at their last tumor assessment date.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Fludarabine+cyclophosphamide (FC) intravenously for a total of 6 treatment cycles at intervals of 28 days. Fludarabine: 25 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 2, 3 for 6 cycles. Cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 2, 3 for 6 cycles.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide (FC)
  2. description
    Rituximab and FC intravenously for a total of 6 treatment cycles at intervals of 28 days. Cycle 1: rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on Day 1; fludarabine 25 mg/m² IV on Days 2, 3, 4; cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² IV on Days 2, 3, 4. Cycles 2-6: rituximab 500 mg/m² IV on Day 1; fludarabine 25 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 2, 3; cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 2, 3.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide+Rituximab (FCR)
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population was comprised of all patients randomized in the study, irrespective of whether they received treatment or not.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Mean observation time at time of analysis was approximately 26 months
title
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Days

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice