TriangleNCT00085202 · OUTCOME
Reading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care Groups
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEAN
- Unit
- score on a scale
- Interval / dispersion
- Standard Error
- Time frame
- 5 years postdiagnosis
What was measured
SOC is standard-of-Care control group. Patients randomly assigned to the control group received the current standard of care. RI is Reading Intervention Group. Patients randomly assigned to Reading Intervention Group which is with The Fast ForWord program. Assessment of reading decoding was completed using the Woodcock Johnson, Third Edition (WJIII) Tests of Achievement (Woodcock, McGraw, \& Mather, 2001), with particular attention given to the reading and reading-related abilities. Two subtests were completed: (1) Letter-Word Identification, and (2) Word Attack, a test requiring the patient to read phonologically regular nonwords. The combination of these two subtests provided a standardized composite score of overall reading decoding ability with a population mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Scores of 90-110 are considered to be in the average range, while those 80-89 are considered low-average (refer: Journal of Pediatric Psychology 39(4) pp. 450-458, 2014).
Analysis population: Of the 126 MB patients enrolled, 41 were not eligible. This left 85 patients considered eligible for the randomization study. Of the 85 eligible patients,81 were randomized to either SOC (n= 38) or to RI (n =43). The parents of only four patients did not consent to the intervention study. Two patients randomized to the RI group, and four patients in the SOC group, were excluded due to having only a single assessment, which resulted in 75 patients (RI=41, SOC=34) over a 5-year follow-up period.
Groups in this outcome
Intervention
A COMPUTER-BASED TRAINING SYSTEM SPECIFICALLY TARGETING LANGUAGE, READING, AND LEARNING SKILLS (FAST FORWORD®, SCIENTIFIC LEARNING CORPORATION)
Standard of Care
THE CURRENT STANDARD OF CARE ON READING DECODING SKILLS
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Intervention | 41 |
| Standard of Care | 34 |
Reported measurements
Baseline
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | 104.1 | 1.902 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Standard of Care | 102.4 | 2.604 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Change over time
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | -1.51 | 0.4849 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Standard of Care | -1.17 | 0.4883 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Source statistical analyses
- group Description
- Change over time
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.6231
- statistical Method
- t-test, 2 sided
- group Description
- Baseline
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.5720
- statistical Method
- t-test, 2 sided
Complete source fields
- analyses
- group Description
- Change over time
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.6231
- statistical Method
- t-test, 2 sided
- group Description
- Baseline
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.5720
- statistical Method
- t-test, 2 sided
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 1.902
- value
- 104.1
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 2.604
- value
- 102.4
- title
- Baseline
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 0.4849
- value
- -1.51
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 0.4883
- value
- -1.17
- title
- Change over time
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 41
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 34
- units
- Participants
- description
- SOC is standard-of-Care control group. Patients randomly assigned to the control group received the current standard of care. RI is Reading Intervention Group. Patients randomly assigned to Reading Intervention Group which is with The Fast ForWord program. Assessment of reading decoding was completed using the Woodcock Johnson, Third Edition (WJIII) Tests of Achievement (Woodcock, McGraw, \& Mather, 2001), with particular attention given to the reading and reading-related abilities. Two subtests were completed: (1) Letter-Word Identification, and (2) Word Attack, a test requiring the patient to read phonologically regular nonwords. The combination of these two subtests provided a standardized composite score of overall reading decoding ability with a population mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Scores of 90-110 are considered to be in the average range, while those 80-89 are considered low-average (refer: Journal of Pediatric Psychology 39(4) pp. 450-458, 2014).
- dispersion Type
- Standard Error
- groups
- description
- A COMPUTER-BASED TRAINING SYSTEM SPECIFICALLY TARGETING LANGUAGE, READING, AND LEARNING SKILLS (FAST FORWORD®, SCIENTIFIC LEARNING CORPORATION)
- id
- OG000
- title
- Intervention
- description
- THE CURRENT STANDARD OF CARE ON READING DECODING SKILLS
- id
- OG001
- title
- Standard of Care
- param Type
- MEAN
- population Description
- Of the 126 MB patients enrolled, 41 were not eligible. This left 85 patients considered eligible for the randomization study. Of the 85 eligible patients,81 were randomized to either SOC (n= 38) or to RI (n =43). The parents of only four patients did not consent to the intervention study. Two patients randomized to the RI group, and four patients in the SOC group, were excluded due to having only a single assessment, which resulted in 75 patients (RI=41, SOC=34) over a 5-year follow-up period.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- 5 years postdiagnosis
- title
- Reading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care Groups
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- score on a scale
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice