Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT00084318 · OUTCOME

Local-regional Control

Adjuvant Cetuximab and Chemoradiotherapy Using Either Cisplatin or Docetaxel in Treating Patients With Resected Stage III or Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma or Lymphoepithelioma of the Head and Neck · Source last updated 2018-12-12

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From randomization to 2 years

What was measured

Two-year rate is shown (cumulative incidence estimate). Local-regional failure is defined as the time from randomization to local-regional recurrence (event), death (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored).

Analysis population: Eligible patients who started protocol treatment and did not withdraw consent.

Groups in this outcome

RT + Cisplatin + Cetuximab

Loading dose of cetuximab followed by radiation therapy with weekly cisplatin and cetuximab.

RT + Docetaxel + Cetuximab

Loading dose of cetuximab followed by radiation therapy (RT) with weekly docetaxel and cetuximab.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
RT + Cisplatin + Cetuximab97
RT + Docetaxel + Cetuximab106

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
RT + Cisplatin + Cetuximab19.8Not reported11.827.8Not reported
RT + Docetaxel + Cetuximab18.9Not reported13.424.3Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.63
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.76
    estimate Comment
    Reference arm = historical control
    group Description
    Two-year failure rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. RTOG 0234 results were compared to historical control data (the chemoradiation arm of study RTOG-9501/NCT00002670) by 1-sided Gray's test. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox model. \[RTOG = Radiation Therapy Oncology Group\]
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.66
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.05
    statistical Comment
    Historical control data (RTOG-9501/NCT00002670): n=202, two-year failure rate of 19.9% (12.2% to 27.5%)
    statistical Method
    Gray's test
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.72
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.87
    estimate Comment
    Reference arm = historical control
    group Description
    Two-year failure rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. RTOG 0234 results were compared to historical control data (the chemoradiation arm of study RTOG-9501/NCT00002670) by 1-sided Gray's test. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox model.
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.86
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.16
    statistical Comment
    Historical control data (RTOG-9501/NCT00002670): n=202, two-year failure rate of 19.9% (12.2% to 27.5%)
    statistical Method
    Gray's test
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.63
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.76
    estimate Comment
    Reference arm = historical control
    group Description
    Two-year failure rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. RTOG 0234 results were compared to historical control data (the chemoradiation arm of study RTOG-9501/NCT00002670) by 1-sided Gray's test. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox model. \[RTOG = Radiation Therapy Oncology Group\]
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.66
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.05
    statistical Comment
    Historical control data (RTOG-9501/NCT00002670): n=202, two-year failure rate of 19.9% (12.2% to 27.5%)
    statistical Method
    Gray's test
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.72
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.87
    estimate Comment
    Reference arm = historical control
    group Description
    Two-year failure rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. RTOG 0234 results were compared to historical control data (the chemoradiation arm of study RTOG-9501/NCT00002670) by 1-sided Gray's test. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox model.
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.86
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.16
    statistical Comment
    Historical control data (RTOG-9501/NCT00002670): n=202, two-year failure rate of 19.9% (12.2% to 27.5%)
    statistical Method
    Gray's test
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        11.8
        upper Limit
        27.8
        value
        19.8
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        13.4
        upper Limit
        24.3
        value
        18.9
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      97
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      106
    units
    Participants
description
Two-year rate is shown (cumulative incidence estimate). Local-regional failure is defined as the time from randomization to local-regional recurrence (event), death (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored).
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Loading dose of cetuximab followed by radiation therapy with weekly cisplatin and cetuximab.
    id
    OG000
    title
    RT + Cisplatin + Cetuximab
  2. description
    Loading dose of cetuximab followed by radiation therapy (RT) with weekly docetaxel and cetuximab.
    id
    OG001
    title
    RT + Docetaxel + Cetuximab
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
Eligible patients who started protocol treatment and did not withdraw consent.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From randomization to 2 years
title
Local-regional Control
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice