NCT00069095 · OUTCOME
Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEDIAN
- Unit
- days
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
What was measured
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of the primary study treatment phase due to adverse event/intercurrent illness, insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, refusing treatment/being unwilling to cooperate, or withdrawing consent; discontinuation of the post study treatment phase due to adverse event, progressive disease, death, participant refusal/administrative reasons, or withdrawing consent; documented disease progression; or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The general approach included all tumor assessments or deaths that occurred during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase, or the follow-up phase. The on-treatment approach included only tumor assessments and deaths that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase only.
Analysis population: The safety population included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of capecitabine, 5-FU, oxaliplatin, or bevacizumab/placebo.
Groups in this outcome
FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P
Participants from the 2x2 factorial part of the study including the following groups - 1. Folfox-4+P: Participants received 2-week cycles of infused leucovorin, bolus injection fluorouracil and continuous infusion fluorouracil (given on days 1 and 2), combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and placebo control for bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 2 weeks). 2. Xelox+P: Capecitabine was administered as an oral twice-daily outpatient intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and placebo (P) control for bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 3 weeks).
FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV
Participants from the 2x2 factorial part of the study including the following groups - 1. Folfox-4+BV: Participants who received 2-week cycles of infused leucovorin, bolus injection fluorouracil and continuous infusion fluorouracil (given on days 1 and 2), combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and intravenous bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 2 weeks). 2. Xelox+BV: Capecitabine was administered as an oral twice-daily outpatient intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and intravenous bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 3 weeks).
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P | 675 |
| FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV | 694 |
Reported measurements
General Approach
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P | 183.0 | Not reported | 176 | 198 | Not reported |
| FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV | 209.0 | Not reported | 199 | 220 | Not reported |
On-treatment Approach
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P | 182.0 | Not reported | 175 | 196 | Not reported |
| FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV | 208.0 | Not reported | 198 | 220 | Not reported |
Source statistical analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.74
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 97.5
- ci Upper Limit
- 0.96
- group Description
- General approach: Testing for superiority was based on the stratified log-rank test and used a two-sided significance level of 2.5%.The hazard ratio (HR) of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone \[HR(FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P)/(FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV)\] was presented.
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
- p Value
- 0.0030
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.84
- statistical Method
- Log Rank
- tested Non Inferiority
- false
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.70
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 97.5
- ci Upper Limit
- 0.92
- group Description
- On treatment approach: Testing for superiority was based on the stratified log-rank test and used a two-sided significance level of 2.5%.The hazard ratio (HR) of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone \[HR(FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P)/(FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV)\] was presented.
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
- p Value
- 0.0004
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.81
- statistical Method
- Log Rank
- tested Non Inferiority
- false
Complete source fields
- analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.74
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 97.5
- ci Upper Limit
- 0.96
- group Description
- General approach: Testing for superiority was based on the stratified log-rank test and used a two-sided significance level of 2.5%.The hazard ratio (HR) of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone \[HR(FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P)/(FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV)\] was presented.
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
- p Value
- 0.0030
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.84
- statistical Method
- Log Rank
- tested Non Inferiority
- false
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.70
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 97.5
- ci Upper Limit
- 0.92
- group Description
- On treatment approach: Testing for superiority was based on the stratified log-rank test and used a two-sided significance level of 2.5%.The hazard ratio (HR) of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone \[HR(FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P)/(FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV)\] was presented.
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
- p Value
- 0.0004
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.81
- statistical Method
- Log Rank
- tested Non Inferiority
- false
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 176
- upper Limit
- 198
- value
- 183.0
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 199
- upper Limit
- 220
- value
- 209.0
- title
- General Approach
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 175
- upper Limit
- 196
- value
- 182.0
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 198
- upper Limit
- 220
- value
- 208.0
- title
- On-treatment Approach
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 675
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 694
- units
- Participants
- description
- Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of the primary study treatment phase due to adverse event/intercurrent illness, insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, refusing treatment/being unwilling to cooperate, or withdrawing consent; discontinuation of the post study treatment phase due to adverse event, progressive disease, death, participant refusal/administrative reasons, or withdrawing consent; documented disease progression; or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The general approach included all tumor assessments or deaths that occurred during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase, or the follow-up phase. The on-treatment approach included only tumor assessments and deaths that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase only.
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- Participants from the 2x2 factorial part of the study including the following groups - 1. Folfox-4+P: Participants received 2-week cycles of infused leucovorin, bolus injection fluorouracil and continuous infusion fluorouracil (given on days 1 and 2), combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and placebo control for bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 2 weeks). 2. Xelox+P: Capecitabine was administered as an oral twice-daily outpatient intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and placebo (P) control for bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 3 weeks).
- id
- OG000
- title
- FOLFOX-4+P/XELOX+P
- description
- Participants from the 2x2 factorial part of the study including the following groups - 1. Folfox-4+BV: Participants who received 2-week cycles of infused leucovorin, bolus injection fluorouracil and continuous infusion fluorouracil (given on days 1 and 2), combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and intravenous bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 2 weeks). 2. Xelox+BV: Capecitabine was administered as an oral twice-daily outpatient intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) combined with intravenous oxaliplatin and intravenous bevacizumab (both given on day 1 every 3 weeks).
- id
- OG001
- title
- FOLFOX-4+BV/XELOX+BV
- param Type
- MEDIAN
- population Description
- The safety population included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of capecitabine, 5-FU, oxaliplatin, or bevacizumab/placebo.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
- title
- Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- days
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle