NCT00003290 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS
Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.
- Phase
- PHASE3
- Status at capture
- COMPLETED
- Registry last update
- 2013-12-04
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard radiation therapy is more effective than high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard radiation therapy with that of high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with stage II or stage III prostate cancer.
Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record
What did the study report?
Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.
No posted result sections were captured. Registered plans do not establish that a treatment works.
Who could take part
- eligibility Criteria
- DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed prostate cancer * T1b-T3a, N0, M0 (stage II or III) * Prostate-specific antigen at least 50 ng/mL PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: * Not specified Performance status: * WHO 0-1 Life expectancy: * Not specified Hematopoietic: * WBC greater than 4,000/mm\^3 * Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm\^3 * Hemoglobin greater than 11 g/dL Hepatic: * Not specified Renal: * Not specified Other: * No significant past medical history that would preclude radical radiotherapy * No condition that would preclude standard radiotherapy * No hip prosthesis PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: * Not specified Chemotherapy: * Not specified Endocrine therapy: * No prior androgen deprivation therapy Radiotherapy: * No prior pelvic radiotherapy Surgery: * No prior radical prostatectomy
- healthy Volunteers
- false
- sex
- MALE
- std Ages
- CHILD
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
- interventions
- name
- gonadotrophin releasing hormone
- type
- BIOLOGICAL
- name
- radiation therapy
- type
- RADIATION
Study design
- allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- primary Purpose
- TREATMENT
Enrollment
- count
- 800
- type
- ESTIMATED
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
Full study description
- brief Summary
- RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard radiation therapy is more effective than high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard radiation therapy with that of high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with stage II or stage III prostate cancer.
- detailed Description
- OBJECTIVES: * Compare local tumor control in patients with stage II or III prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy with standard vs high-dose conformal radiotherapy. * Compare the incidence of biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 2 ng/mL at 6 or more months after initiation of radiotherapy and PSA rising from nadir level by at least 50%), development of metastases, and survival in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the acute and late radiation-induced side effects of these regimens in this patient population. * Compare aspects of quality of life, health economics, models of normal tissue, and tumor control in patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prostate-specific antigen, T stage, and Gleason score. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. All patients receive neoadjuvant androgen deprivation with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists every 4 weeks beginning 3-6 months before initiation of radiotherapy and continuing until completion of radiotherapy. * Arm I: Patients undergo standard conformal radiotherapy for 6.5 weeks. * Arm II: Patients undergo high-dose conformal radiotherapy for 7.5 weeks. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter. Patients are followed every 6 months for 2 years and then annually thereafter. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 800 patients will be accrued for this study.
Source references
- references
- citation
- South CP, Khoo VS, Naismith O, Norman A, Dearnaley DP. A comparison of treatment planning techniques used in two randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trials for localised prostate cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Feb;20(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.10.012. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
- pmid
- 18054471
- type
- BACKGROUND
- citation
- van As N, South C, Naismith O, et al.: Radiotherapy planning in UK phase III trials of dose-escalated (MRC RT01) and high-dose hypofractionated radiotherapy (CHHIP) in prostate cancer. [Abstract] 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium, February 24-26, 2006, San Francisco, CA. A-98, 2006.
- type
- BACKGROUND
- citation
- Mayles WP, Moore AR, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Dearnaley DP, Griffiths SE, Warrington AP; RT01 collaborators. Questionnaire based quality assurance for the RT01 trial of dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer (ISRCTN 47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2004 Nov;73(2):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.08.017.
- pmid
- 15622611
- type
- BACKGROUND
- citation
- Sydes MR, Stephens RJ, Moore AR, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Fallowfield LJ, Graham J, Griffiths S, Mayles WP, McGuire A, Stanley S, Warrington AP, Dearnaley DP; RT01 collaborators. Implementing the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) RT01 trial (ISRCTN 47772397): methods and practicalities of a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in men with localised prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2004 Aug;72(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.04.007.
- pmid
- 15297138
- type
- BACKGROUND
- citation
- Gulliford SL, Partridge M, Sydes MR, Webb S, Evans PM, Dearnaley DP. Parameters for the Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) model of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) for specific rectal complications observed in clinical practise. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Mar;102(3):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.022. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
- pmid
- 22119373
- type
- RESULT
- citation
- Barnett GC, De Meerleer G, Gulliford SL, Sydes MR, Elliott RM, Dearnaley DP. The impact of clinical factors on the development of late radiation toxicity: results from the Medical Research Council RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 Nov;23(9):613-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
- pmid
- 21470834
- type
- RESULT
- citation
- Gulliford SL, Foo K, Morgan RC, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Critchley H, Evans PM, Gianolini S, Mayles WP, Moore AR, Sanchez-Nieto B, Partridge M, Sydes MR, Webb S, Dearnaley DP. Dose-volume constraints to reduce rectal side effects from prostate radiotherapy: evidence from MRC RT01 Trial ISRCTN 47772397. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.025. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
- pmid
- 19540054
- type
- RESULT
- citation
- Syndikus I, Morgan RC, Sydes MR, Graham JD, Dearnaley DP; MRC RT01 collaborators. Late gastrointestinal toxicity after dose-escalated conformal radiotherapy for early prostate cancer: results from the UK Medical Research Council RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 1;77(3):773-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.052. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
- pmid
- 19836155
- type
- RESULT
- citation
- Stanley S, Griffiths S, Sydes MR, Moore AR, Syndikus I, Dearnaley DP; RT01 Radiographer Trial Implementation Group. Accuracy and reproducibility of conformal radiotherapy using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Oct;20(8):582-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
- pmid
- 18565744
- type
- RESULT
- citation
- Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, Aird EG, Bottomley D, Cowan RA, Huddart RA, Jose CC, Matthews JH, Millar J, Moore AR, Morgan RC, Russell JM, Scrase CD, Stephens RJ, Syndikus I, Parmar MK; RT01 collaborators. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70143-2.
- pmid
- 17482880
- type
- RESULT
- citation
- Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Langley RE, Graham JD, Huddart RA, Syndikus I, Matthews JH, Scrase CD, Jose CC, Logue J, Stephens RJ; RT01 Collaborators. The early toxicity of escalated versus standard dose conformal radiotherapy with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression for patients with localised prostate cancer: results from the MRC RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2007 Apr;83(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.014. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
- pmid
- 17391791
- type
- RESULT
- citation
- Mangar SA, Sydes MR, Tucker HL, Coffey J, Sohaib SA, Gianolini S, Webb S, Khoo VS; MRC RT01 Trial Management Group; Dearnaley DP. Evaluating the relationship between erectile dysfunction and dose received by the penile bulb: using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2006 Sep;80(3):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.037. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
- pmid
- 16949694
- type
- RESULT
Source notices and limitations
Discovery and provenance
- release id
- ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
- edge id
- nct-edge-e1c38282497faa028fad
- requested nct id
- NCT00003290
- primary nct id
- NCT00003290
- source kind
- nci_explicit_reference_or_link
- source record id
- Source null
- source file sha256
- 89c3cbcb10a3e14c5ee4b607046c929e5902a798e71e758f8a712b0ae71413cf
- payload sha256
- a22a3ea63448d604fb2e3ef289b7af2a6fb6208dca12dbfbeb948b331b2bea30
- payload
- clinical indication matching status
- not_inferred
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-e1c38282497faa028fad
- link basis
- explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
- nct id
- NCT00003290
- occurrences
- context exact
- ne of the studies demonstrated a cause-specific survival benefit to higher doses. <div class="pdq-content-list"><ul id="_2206"><li>The <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00003290">MRC-RT01</a> study (NCT00003290) enrolled 843 men with stage T1b through T3a, N0, M0 prostate cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 64 Gy in 32 f
- end
- 171727
- exact text
- NCT00003290
- start
- 171716
- context exact
- cause-specific survival benefit to higher doses. <div class="pdq-content-list"><ul id="_2206"><li>The <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00003290">MRC-RT01</a> study (NCT00003290) enrolled 843 men with stage T1b through T3a, N0, M0 prostate cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 64 Gy in 32 fractions versus 74 Gy in 37 fract
- end
- 171760
- exact text
- NCT00003290
- start
- 171749
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- source file
- /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/48a3f061dd2bbd22e8.html
- source file sha256
- 89c3cbcb10a3e14c5ee4b607046c929e5902a798e71e758f8a712b0ae71413cf
- source json pointer
- Source null
- source kind
- nci_explicit_reference_or_link
- source record id
- Source null
- source retrieved at
- 2026-09-09T23:22:14.334045+00:00
- source string basis
- UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
- source string sha256
- 351f45145a6c8591cdadd072763243033f8e1fa33cafecd55e4bac86e2b9edf3
- source title
- Prostate Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
- source update dates
- context
- Updated: May 14, 2025
- datetime
- 2025-05-14T12:00:00Z
- display
- May 14, 2025
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle