Skip to content
← Study library

NCT00002546 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Radiation Therapy Compared With Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Cancer of the Uterus

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2016-02-11

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy is more effective than combination chemotherapy in treating patients with cancer of the uterus. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared to combination chemotherapy in treating patients with cancer of the uterus.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

No posted result sections were captured. Registered plans do not establish that a treatment works.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed primary homologous or heterologous carcinosarcoma of the uterus (corpus and cervix) * Surgical stage I-IV disease, including positive adnexa, tumor invading the serosa, positive pelvic and/or para-aortic nodes, involvement of the mucosa of the bowel, bladder, or rectum, intra-abdominal metastases, positive pelvic washings, or vaginal involvement within planned radiation port * Prior total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and maximum tumor resection of all gross intra-abdominal/pelvic disease, including grossly involved pelvic and para-aortic nodes within 8 weeks before study * No greater than 1 cm residual disease * Cervical sarcomas also allowed * No metastasis beyond the abdominal cavity at diagnosis, including the following: * Parenchymal liver metastasis * Lung metastasis * Positive inguinal lymph nodes * Positive scalene nodes * Radiographic or pathologic evidence of bone or brain metastasis PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: * 21 and over Performance status: * GOG 0-2 Hematopoietic: * WBC at least 3,000/mm3 * Granulocyte count at least 1,500/mm3 * Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: * Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal * SGOT no greater than 3 times normal * Albumin at least 3 g/dL * No acute hepatitis Renal: * Creatinine no greater than 1.5 mg/dL OR * Creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min Other: * No septicemia * No severe infection * No severe gastrointestinal bleeding * No prior invasive or concurrent malignancy within the past 5 years except nonmelanoma skin cancer PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: * Not specified Chemotherapy: * No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: * Prior hormonal therapy allowed Radiotherapy: * See Disease Characteristics * No prior radiotherapy Surgery: * See Disease Characteristics Other: * No prior therapy that would preclude study therapy
healthy Volunteers
false
maximum Age
120 Years
minimum Age
21 Years
sex
FEMALE
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
interventions
  1. name
    cisplatin
    type
    DRUG
  2. name
    ifosfamide
    type
    DRUG
  3. name
    adjuvant therapy
    type
    PROCEDURE
  4. name
    radiation therapy
    type
    RADIATION
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
216
type
ESTIMATED
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
Full study description
brief Summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy is more effective than combination chemotherapy in treating patients with cancer of the uterus. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared to combination chemotherapy in treating patients with cancer of the uterus.
detailed Description
OBJECTIVES: * Compare the survival, progression-free interval, and failure patterns in patients with optimally debulked stage I-IV carcinosarcoma of the uterus treated with whole abdominal radiotherapy vs ifosfamide and cisplatin. * Compare the incidence and type of acute and late adverse events observed with these treatment regimens in this patient population. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive whole abdominal radiotherapy 5 days a week for 4 weeks, followed by radiotherapy boost to the pelvis 5 days a week for 2.2 weeks. * Arm II: Patients receive cisplatin IV followed by ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-4. Treatment continues every 3 weeks for 3 courses. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 216 patients will be accrued for this study within 6 years.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Wolfson AH, Brady MF, Rocereto T, Mannel RS, Lee YC, Futoran RJ, Cohn DE, Ioffe OB. A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.070. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
    pmid
    17822748
    type
    RESULT
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-2475a7c45f9987b0a463
      requested nct id
      NCT00002546
      primary nct id
      NCT00002546
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      5c4e95734127c7fe3908f56c0336347f44fc40e9ba1ebf39006f988bcc962614
      payload sha256
      4d5e6af7d10f59297f78d32dbca2cfb591fba059742909e53122e731312f818d
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-2475a7c45f9987b0a463
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT00002546
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        sicians have considered the use of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy.[<a href="#cit/section_4.2">2</a>] Another GOG study (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00002546">GOG-0150</a> [NCT00002546]) addressed radiation therapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy.[<a href="#cit/section_4.3">3</a>]</p><h6 do-not-show="toc">References</h
        end
        39258
        exact text
        NCT00002546
        start
        39247
      2. context exact
        use of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy.[<a href="#cit/section_4.2">2</a>] Another GOG study (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT00002546">GOG-0150</a> [NCT00002546]) addressed radiation therapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy.[<a href="#cit/section_4.3">3</a>]</p><h6 do-not-show="toc">References</h6><ol><li id="section_4.1">
        end
        39285
        exact text
        NCT00002546
        start
        39274
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/87e4c91691eba06359.html
      source file sha256
      5c4e95734127c7fe3908f56c0336347f44fc40e9ba1ebf39006f988bcc962614
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:22:25.541847+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      f3035fef0aba3b3ce9c9d3c5d490e12661a22cbc62ca1d1e1c5d234fbe67c618
      source title
      Uterine Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: December 17, 2024
        datetime
        2024-12-17T12:00:00Z
        display
        December 17, 2024

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice