NCT00949650 · STUDY IN CONTEXT
BIBW 2992 (Afatinib) Versus Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment in NSCLC With EGFR Mutation
Draft scope assessment: unclear. Attached because the study's own record names EGFR and names EGFR. The study record does not state Exon 19 Deletion, so it may describe a different alteration of the same gene. The study was not selected for this indication by its sponsor, and its eligibility has not been reconciled against this page in full. Found because this study's registry identifier is printed in an FDA approval notice, an FDA product label or an NCI summary held by this site. The citing document and the exact position of the identifier inside it are recorded. Being cited is not a statement that the study supports this treatment.
Read the full study record and all posted results →
Linked outcomes
PFS was defined as time from randomisation to disease progression or death whichever occured first. Assessed by central independent review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1). Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
OR was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). Assessed by central independent review according to RECIST 1.1.
DC was defined as a patient with OR or Stable Disease (SD). Assessed by central independent review according to the RECIST 1.1.
OS was defined as time from randomisation to death.
Tumour shrinkage was calculated as the minimum Sum of Diameters (SoD) of target lesions from all post-baseline tumour assessments, as read by the central independent review. The mean of these minimum values were presented after adjusting for baseline SoD, EGFR mutation group and race.
Because the PFS was longer for patients in the Afatinib arm than for patients in the chemotherapy arm, the period of data collection for ECOG status and body weight continued for a longer time in the Afatinib arm.
Reported safety
Quality of life and patient-reported measures
EORTC QLQ · Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration in Coughing
Score direction: Lower is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- qol key
- qol-0007
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0007
- source outcome index
- 7
- instrument
- EORTC QLQ
- instrument basis
- matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration in Coughing
- measure definition
- HRQOL was measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and its lung cancer specific module LC13 (QLQ-LC13). Analysis for cough is based on QLQ-LC13 question 1. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
- time frame
- Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- 0
- direction quote
- increased (worse
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
EORTC QLQ · HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Dyspnoea
Score direction: Lower is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- qol key
- qol-0008
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0008
- source outcome index
- 8
- instrument
- EORTC QLQ
- instrument basis
- matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Dyspnoea
- measure definition
- HRQOL was measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for dyspnoea is based on composite of QLQ-LC13 questions 3-5. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
- time frame
- Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- 0
- direction quote
- increased (worse
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
EORTC QLQ · HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Pain
Score direction: Lower is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- qol key
- qol-0009
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0009
- source outcome index
- 9
- instrument
- EORTC QLQ
- instrument basis
- matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Pain
- measure definition
- HRQOL was measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for pain is based on composite of QLQ-C30 questions 9 and 19. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
- time frame
- Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- 0
- direction quote
- increased (worse
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Full draft applicability and source-link record
- trial
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- trial label
- BIBW 2992 (Afatinib) Versus Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment in NSCLC With EGFR Mutation
- applicability
- unclear
- applicability note
- Attached because the study's own record names EGFR and names EGFR. The study record does not state Exon 19 Deletion, so it may describe a different alteration of the same gene. The study was not selected for this indication by its sponsor, and its eligibility has not been reconciled against this page in full.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- provenance class
- regulator-cited
- discovery note
- Found because this study's registry identifier is printed in an FDA approval notice, an FDA product label or an NCI summary held by this site. The citing document and the exact position of the identifier inside it are recorded. Being cited is not a statement that the study supports this treatment.
- outcome Count
- 6
- harms Count
- 2
- qol Count
- 3
- outcomes
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0000
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0000
- source outcome index
- 0
- endpoint
- Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time
- endpoint definition
- PFS was defined as time from randomisation to disease progression or death whichever occured first. Assessed by central independent review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1). Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
- time origin
- Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression
- analysis role
- primary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Randomised set (RS)
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0001
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0001
- source outcome index
- 1
- endpoint
- Percentage of Patients With Objective Response (OR)
- endpoint definition
- OR was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). Assessed by central independent review according to RECIST 1.1.
- time origin
- Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0002
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0002
- source outcome index
- 2
- endpoint
- Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC)
- endpoint definition
- DC was defined as a patient with OR or Stable Disease (SD). Assessed by central independent review according to the RECIST 1.1.
- time origin
- Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0003
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0003
- source outcome index
- 3
- endpoint
- Overall Survival (OS) Time
- endpoint definition
- OS was defined as time from randomisation to death.
- time origin
- From randomisation to cut-off date (17MAR2017).
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0004
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0004
- source outcome index
- 4
- endpoint
- Tumour Shrinkage
- endpoint definition
- Tumour shrinkage was calculated as the minimum Sum of Diameters (SoD) of target lesions from all post-baseline tumour assessments, as read by the central independent review. The mean of these minimum values were presented after adjusting for baseline SoD, EGFR mutation group and race.
- time origin
- Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- RS. There were only 203 patients in the Afatinib 40 mg arm and 101 patients in the Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy with tumour measurements.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0005
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0005
- source outcome index
- 5
- endpoint
- Change From Baseline in Body Weight
- endpoint definition
- Because the PFS was longer for patients in the Afatinib arm than for patients in the chemotherapy arm, the period of data collection for ECOG status and body weight continued for a longer time in the Afatinib arm.
- time origin
- Baseline and throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks), up to 28 months.
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- RS. Only patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment were included.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- arms
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0000
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Afatinib 40 mg
- regimen
- Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily.
- analyzed count
- 230
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0000#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0000
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
- regimen
- Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
- analyzed count
- 115
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0000#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0001
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Afatinib 40 mg
- regimen
- Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily.
- analyzed count
- 230
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0001#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0001
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
- regimen
- Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
- analyzed count
- 115
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0001#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0002
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Afatinib 40 mg
- regimen
- Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily.
- analyzed count
- 230
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0002#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0002
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
- regimen
- Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
- analyzed count
- 115
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0002#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0003
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Afatinib 40 mg
- regimen
- Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily.
- analyzed count
- 230
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0003#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0003
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
- regimen
- Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
- analyzed count
- 115
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0003#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0004
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Afatinib 40 mg
- regimen
- Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily.
- analyzed count
- 203
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0004#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0004
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
- regimen
- Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
- analyzed count
- 101
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0004#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0005
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Afatinib 40 mg
- regimen
- Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily.
- analyzed count
- 224
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0005#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- outcome key
- om-0005
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
- regimen
- Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
- analyzed count
- 109
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT00949650-om-0005#groups/OG001
- harms
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- harm key
- EG000
- source section id
- NCT00949650-ae
- event group key
- EG000
- event group label
- Afatinib 40 mg
- serious affected
- 72
- serious at risk
- 229
- other affected
- 229
- other at risk
- 229
- frequency threshold
- 5
- collection period
- First administration of trial medication until 28 days after last administration of trial medication.
- event definition
- Source null
- undenominated note
- Source null
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- harm key
- EG001
- source section id
- NCT00949650-ae
- event group key
- EG001
- event group label
- Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
- serious affected
- 25
- serious at risk
- 111
- other affected
- 108
- other at risk
- 111
- frequency threshold
- 5
- collection period
- First administration of trial medication until 28 days after last administration of trial medication.
- event definition
- Source null
- undenominated note
- Source null
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- quality of life
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- qol key
- qol-0007
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0007
- source outcome index
- 7
- instrument
- EORTC QLQ
- instrument basis
- matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration in Coughing
- measure definition
- HRQOL was measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and its lung cancer specific module LC13 (QLQ-LC13). Analysis for cough is based on QLQ-LC13 question 1. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
- time frame
- Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- 0
- direction quote
- increased (worse
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- qol key
- qol-0008
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0008
- source outcome index
- 8
- instrument
- EORTC QLQ
- instrument basis
- matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Dyspnoea
- measure definition
- HRQOL was measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for dyspnoea is based on composite of QLQ-LC13 questions 3-5. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
- time frame
- Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- 0
- direction quote
- increased (worse
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-rybrevant-b2022b2b
- nct id
- NCT00949650
- qol key
- qol-0009
- source section id
- NCT00949650-om-0009
- source outcome index
- 9
- instrument
- EORTC QLQ
- instrument basis
- matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Pain
- measure definition
- HRQOL was measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for pain is based on composite of QLQ-C30 questions 9 and 19. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
- time frame
- Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- 0
- direction quote
- increased (worse
- population note
- RS.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- setting source links
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle