NCT01168973 · STUDY IN CONTEXT
A Study of Chemotherapy and Ramucirumab Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Second Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Participants Who Received Prior First Line Platinum-based Chemot
Draft scope assessment: unclear. Attached because the study's own record describes metastatic disease. The study was not selected for this indication by its sponsor, and its eligibility has not been reconciled against this page in full. Found because this study's registry identifier is printed in an FDA approval notice, an FDA product label or an NCI summary held by this site. The citing document and the exact position of the identifier inside it are recorded. Being cited is not a statement that the study supports this treatment.
Read the full study record and all posted results →
Linked outcomes
Overall survival was the time from randomization until the date of death from any cause. Participants who were alive at the end of the follow-up period (or lost to follow-up) were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
PFS time was the time from randomization until the date of objectively determined progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the 20% relative increase, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). The appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions was also considered progression. Participants without objectively determined PD who were alive at the end of the follow-up period (or lost to follow-up) were censored on the date of the participant's last complete radiographic tumor assessment; if no baseline or post-baseline radiologic assessment was available, the participant was censored at the date of randomization.
Participants achieved an objective response if they had a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). According to RECIST v1.1, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph node), taking as reference the baseline sum diameter; CR was the disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions, with the short axes of any target lymph node reduced to \<10 mm, the disappearance of all nontarget lesions, and the normalization of tumor marker levels \[if tumor markers were initially above the upper limit of normal (ULN)\]. The percentage of participants who achieved an objective response=(number of participants with CR or PR)/(number of participants assessed)\*100.
Participants achieved disease control if they had a best overall response of PR, CR or stable disease (SD). According to RECIST v1.1, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph node), taking as reference the baseline sum diameter; CR was the disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions, with the short axes of any target lymph node reduced to \<10 mm, the disappearance of all nontarget lesions, and the normalization of tumor marker levels (if tumor markers were initially above the ULN). SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter since treatment started. The percentage of participants who achieved disease control=(number of participants with CR, PR, or SD)/(number of participants assessed)\*100.
The LCSS consisted of 9 items: 6 items focused on lung cancer symptoms \[loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea (shortness of breath), hemoptysis (blood in sputum), and pain\] and 3 items were global items (symptom distress, interference with activity level, and global quality of life). Participant responses to each item were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) with 100-mm lines. A higher score for any item represented a higher level of symptoms/problems. The Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) was the mean of the 6 symptom items of the LCSS, and the Total LCSS was the mean of all 9 LCSS items. ASBI and Total LCSS were not computed for a participant if he/she had 1 or more missing values for the 6 and 9 items, respectively. Maximum improvement in LCSS scores, ASBI, and Total LCSS score was the largest decrease from baseline for each variable, which was the smallest (most negative or smallest positive) non-missing value among all change from baseline values for each variable.
The EQ-5D is a quality-of-life instrument that consists of 2 parts. The first part (Health State Index score) allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a scale from 1 to 3 (no problem, some problems, and extreme problems, respectively). These combinations of attributes were converted into a weighted Health State Index score according to a United Kingdom population-based algorithm; the possible values for the Health State Index score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). The second part of the EQ-5D was a VAS that allowed participants to rate their present health condition. Possible EQ-5D VAS scores ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Reported safety
Quality of life and patient-reported measures
Unnamed quality-of-life measure · Maximum Improvement on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- qol key
- qol-0004
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0004
- source outcome index
- 4
- instrument
- Unnamed quality-of-life measure
- instrument basis
- matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- Maximum Improvement on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
- measure definition
- The LCSS consisted of 9 items: 6 items focused on lung cancer symptoms \[loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea (shortness of breath), hemoptysis (blood in sputum), and pain\] and 3 items were global items (symptom distress, interference with activity level, and global quality of life). Participant responses to each item were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) with 100-mm lines. A higher score for any item represented a higher level of symptoms/problems. The Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) was the mean of the 6 symptom items of the LCSS, and the Total LCSS was the mean of all 9 LCSS items. ASBI and Total LCSS were not computed for a participant if he/she had 1 or more missing values for the 6 and 9 items, respectively. Maximum improvement in LCSS scores, ASBI, and Total LCSS score was the largest decrease from baseline for each variable, which was the smallest (most negative or smallest positive) non-missing value among all change from baseline values for each variable.
- time frame
- Baseline, Day 21 of each cycle, and 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- Source null
- direction quote
- Source null
- population note
- Randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization, who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline LCSS score.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
EQ-5D · Change From Baseline to 30-Day Follow-Up Visit on European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Scores
Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- qol key
- qol-0005
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0005
- source outcome index
- 5
- instrument
- EQ-5D
- instrument basis
- matched 'eq-5d' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- Change From Baseline to 30-Day Follow-Up Visit on European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Scores
- measure definition
- The EQ-5D is a quality-of-life instrument that consists of 2 parts. The first part (Health State Index score) allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a scale from 1 to 3 (no problem, some problems, and extreme problems, respectively). These combinations of attributes were converted into a weighted Health State Index score according to a United Kingdom population-based algorithm; the possible values for the Health State Index score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). The second part of the EQ-5D was a VAS that allowed participants to rate their present health condition. Possible EQ-5D VAS scores ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
- time frame
- Baseline, 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- Source null
- direction quote
- Source null
- population note
- Randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization, who had an EQ-5D assessment at a baseline and 30 days post treatment.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Full draft applicability and source-link record
- trial
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- trial label
- A Study of Chemotherapy and Ramucirumab Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Second Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Participants Who Received Prior First Line Platinum-based Chemot
- applicability
- unclear
- applicability note
- Attached because the study's own record describes metastatic disease. The study was not selected for this indication by its sponsor, and its eligibility has not been reconciled against this page in full.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- provenance class
- regulator-cited
- discovery note
- Found because this study's registry identifier is printed in an FDA approval notice, an FDA product label or an NCI summary held by this site. The citing document and the exact position of the identifier inside it are recorded. Being cited is not a statement that the study supports this treatment.
- outcome Count
- 6
- harms Count
- 2
- qol Count
- 2
- outcomes
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0000
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0000
- source outcome index
- 0
- endpoint
- Overall Survival
- endpoint definition
- Overall survival was the time from randomization until the date of death from any cause. Participants who were alive at the end of the follow-up period (or lost to follow-up) were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
- time origin
- Randomization to date of death from any cause (up to 34 months)
- analysis role
- primary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization. Participants censored: ramucirumab and docetaxel arm = 200 participants; placebo and docetaxel arm = 169 participants.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0001
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0001
- source outcome index
- 1
- endpoint
- Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time
- endpoint definition
- PFS time was the time from randomization until the date of objectively determined progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the 20% relative increase, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). The appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions was also considered progression. Participants without objectively determined PD who were alive at the end of the follow-up period (or lost to follow-up) were censored on the date of the participant's last complete radiographic tumor assessment; if no baseline or post-baseline radiologic assessment was available, the participant was censored at the date of randomization.
- time origin
- Randomization to measured PD or date of death from any cause (up to 29 months)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- ITT population: All randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization. Participants censored: ramucirumab and docetaxel arm = 70 participants; placebo and docetaxel arm = 42 participants.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0002
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0002
- source outcome index
- 2
- endpoint
- Percentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)
- endpoint definition
- Participants achieved an objective response if they had a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). According to RECIST v1.1, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph node), taking as reference the baseline sum diameter; CR was the disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions, with the short axes of any target lymph node reduced to \<10 mm, the disappearance of all nontarget lesions, and the normalization of tumor marker levels \[if tumor markers were initially above the upper limit of normal (ULN)\]. The percentage of participants who achieved an objective response=(number of participants with CR or PR)/(number of participants assessed)\*100.
- time origin
- Baseline to measured PD (up to 29 months)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- ITT population: All randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0003
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0003
- source outcome index
- 3
- endpoint
- Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control (Disease Control Rate)
- endpoint definition
- Participants achieved disease control if they had a best overall response of PR, CR or stable disease (SD). According to RECIST v1.1, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph node), taking as reference the baseline sum diameter; CR was the disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions, with the short axes of any target lymph node reduced to \<10 mm, the disappearance of all nontarget lesions, and the normalization of tumor marker levels (if tumor markers were initially above the ULN). SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter since treatment started. The percentage of participants who achieved disease control=(number of participants with CR, PR, or SD)/(number of participants assessed)\*100.
- time origin
- Baseline to measured PD (up to 29 months)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- ITT population: All randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0004
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0004
- source outcome index
- 4
- endpoint
- Maximum Improvement on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
- endpoint definition
- The LCSS consisted of 9 items: 6 items focused on lung cancer symptoms \[loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea (shortness of breath), hemoptysis (blood in sputum), and pain\] and 3 items were global items (symptom distress, interference with activity level, and global quality of life). Participant responses to each item were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) with 100-mm lines. A higher score for any item represented a higher level of symptoms/problems. The Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) was the mean of the 6 symptom items of the LCSS, and the Total LCSS was the mean of all 9 LCSS items. ASBI and Total LCSS were not computed for a participant if he/she had 1 or more missing values for the 6 and 9 items, respectively. Maximum improvement in LCSS scores, ASBI, and Total LCSS score was the largest decrease from baseline for each variable, which was the smallest (most negative or smallest positive) non-missing value among all change from baseline values for each variable.
- time origin
- Baseline, Day 21 of each cycle, and 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization, who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline LCSS score.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0005
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0005
- source outcome index
- 5
- endpoint
- Change From Baseline to 30-Day Follow-Up Visit on European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Scores
- endpoint definition
- The EQ-5D is a quality-of-life instrument that consists of 2 parts. The first part (Health State Index score) allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a scale from 1 to 3 (no problem, some problems, and extreme problems, respectively). These combinations of attributes were converted into a weighted Health State Index score according to a United Kingdom population-based algorithm; the possible values for the Health State Index score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). The second part of the EQ-5D was a VAS that allowed participants to rate their present health condition. Possible EQ-5D VAS scores ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
- time origin
- Baseline, 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- data cutoff
- Source null
- population note
- Randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization, who had an EQ-5D assessment at a baseline and 30 days post treatment.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- arms
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0000
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Ramucirumab and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received ramucirumab DP followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Ramucirumab DP: 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 628
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0000#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0000
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Placebo and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received placebo followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Placebo (matching Ramucirumab DP): 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 625
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0000#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0001
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Ramucirumab and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received ramucirumab DP followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Ramucirumab DP: 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 628
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0001#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0001
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Placebo and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received placebo followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Placebo (matching Ramucirumab DP): 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 625
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0001#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0002
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Ramucirumab and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received ramucirumab DP followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Ramucirumab DP: 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 628
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0002#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0002
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Placebo and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received placebo followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Placebo (matching Ramucirumab DP): 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 625
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0002#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0003
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Ramucirumab and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received ramucirumab DP followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Ramucirumab DP: 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 628
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0003#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0003
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Placebo and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received placebo followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Placebo (matching Ramucirumab DP): 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 625
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0003#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0004
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Ramucirumab and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received ramucirumab DP followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Ramucirumab DP: 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 476
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0004#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0004
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Placebo and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received placebo followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Placebo (matching Ramucirumab DP): 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 477
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0004#groups/OG001
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0005
- arm key
- OG000
- arm label
- Ramucirumab and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received ramucirumab DP followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Ramucirumab DP: 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 272
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0005#groups/OG000
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- outcome key
- om-0005
- arm key
- OG001
- arm label
- Placebo and Docetaxel
- regimen
- On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received placebo followed by docetaxel. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria were met. * Placebo (matching Ramucirumab DP): 10 mg/kg administered intravenously. * Docetaxel: 75 mg/m\^2 (60 mg/m\^2 for the countries of Korea and Taiwan only, with protocol amendment dated 22 May 2012) administered intravenously.
- analyzed count
- 272
- analyzed unit
- Participants
- is comparator
- Source null
- source pointer
- NCT01168973-om-0005#groups/OG001
- harms
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- harm key
- EG000
- source section id
- NCT01168973-ae
- event group key
- EG000
- event group label
- Ramucirumab and Docetaxel
- serious affected
- 284
- serious at risk
- 627
- other affected
- 601
- other at risk
- 627
- frequency threshold
- 5
- collection period
- Randomization through 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle).
- event definition
- Safety Population: All randomized participants who received any quantity of study treatment, grouped by the treatment they actually received. Three participants randomized to placebo and docetaxel received 1 dose of ramucirumab in error.
- undenominated note
- Source null
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- harm key
- EG001
- source section id
- NCT01168973-ae
- event group key
- EG001
- event group label
- Placebo and Docetaxel
- serious affected
- 281
- serious at risk
- 618
- other affected
- 583
- other at risk
- 618
- frequency threshold
- 5
- collection period
- Randomization through 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle).
- event definition
- Safety Population: All randomized participants who received any quantity of study treatment, grouped by the treatment they actually received. Three participants randomized to placebo and docetaxel received 1 dose of ramucirumab in error.
- undenominated note
- Source null
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- quality of life
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- qol key
- qol-0004
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0004
- source outcome index
- 4
- instrument
- Unnamed quality-of-life measure
- instrument basis
- matched 'quality of life' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- Maximum Improvement on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
- measure definition
- The LCSS consisted of 9 items: 6 items focused on lung cancer symptoms \[loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea (shortness of breath), hemoptysis (blood in sputum), and pain\] and 3 items were global items (symptom distress, interference with activity level, and global quality of life). Participant responses to each item were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) with 100-mm lines. A higher score for any item represented a higher level of symptoms/problems. The Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) was the mean of the 6 symptom items of the LCSS, and the Total LCSS was the mean of all 9 LCSS items. ASBI and Total LCSS were not computed for a participant if he/she had 1 or more missing values for the 6 and 9 items, respectively. Maximum improvement in LCSS scores, ASBI, and Total LCSS score was the largest decrease from baseline for each variable, which was the smallest (most negative or smallest positive) non-missing value among all change from baseline values for each variable.
- time frame
- Baseline, Day 21 of each cycle, and 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- Source null
- direction quote
- Source null
- population note
- Randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization, who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline LCSS score.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- release id
- clinical-indications-draft-1
- disease state id
- ds-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-bizengri-c0e986a8
- nct id
- NCT01168973
- qol key
- qol-0005
- source section id
- NCT01168973-om-0005
- source outcome index
- 5
- instrument
- EQ-5D
- instrument basis
- matched 'eq-5d' in the study's own wording
- scale title
- Change From Baseline to 30-Day Follow-Up Visit on European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Scores
- measure definition
- The EQ-5D is a quality-of-life instrument that consists of 2 parts. The first part (Health State Index score) allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a scale from 1 to 3 (no problem, some problems, and extreme problems, respectively). These combinations of attributes were converted into a weighted Health State Index score according to a United Kingdom population-based algorithm; the possible values for the Health State Index score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). The second part of the EQ-5D was a VAS that allowed participants to rate their present health condition. Possible EQ-5D VAS scores ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
- time frame
- Baseline, 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
- analysis role
- secondary
- reporting status
- POSTED
- higher is better
- Source null
- direction quote
- Source null
- population note
- Randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization, who had an EQ-5D assessment at a baseline and 30 days post treatment.
- curation status
- draft
- reviewed by
- Source null
- reviewed at
- Source null
- created at
- 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
- setting source links
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle