Skip to content
← Malignant Fallopian Tube Neoplasm

NCT02283658 · STUDY IN CONTEXT

Everolimus and Letrozole in Treating Patients With Recurrent Hormone Receptor Positive Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer

Draft scope assessment: narrower. Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. The condition was transformed or resolved through the terminology hierarchy to reach this cancer type, so the link itself is a candidate a reviewer must confirm. Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.

Read the full study record and all posted results →

Linked outcomes

Measures are not ranked. Open each original source section for treatment groups, denominators, units and results.

primary · POSTED

The percentage of PFS12 successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the exact binomial method. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), Disease progression in evaluable patients will be defined as one or more of the following: * Any new disease and/or clear progression of evaluable disease; OR * 2 fold elevation in CA-125 from its lowest level (either initial level or nadir, whichever is lowest, since study enrollment) combined with CA-125 elevation confirmed by re-assay at any time.

All evaluable patients

→

secondary · POSTED

CA-125 response: The key secondary endpoint of the study will be a CA-125 response, defined as a 50% or greater reduction in baseline CA-125. The null hypothesis will be set at CA-125 response rate of 8.3%, based on the response of single agent letrozole, as reported by Bowman et al (7). The treatment of letrozole and everolimus will be considered promising, based on CA-125, if the observed CA-125 response rate is 30% or more.

All evaluable patients

→

secondary · POSTED

A confirmed tumor response is defined to be either a complete response or partial response noted as the objective status on 2 consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. A complete response (CR) in evaluable patients will be defined as: * Disappearance of any sign of (evaluable) disease, AND * Normalization of CA-125; if CA-125 normalizes, it should be confirmed at any time. A partial response (PR) in evaluable patients will be defined as: * Decrement in CA-125 by \>50%, and * Improvement in any additional evaluable disease (if present) as assessed by the enrolling physician.

All evaluable patients

→

secondary · POSTED

The number of patients with adverse events.The maximum grade for each type of adverse event (AE) will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine AE patterns. These tables are reported in the adverse events section of this report.

All evaluable patients

→

secondary · POSTED

OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

All evaluable patients

→

secondary · POSTED

PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), Disease progression in evaluable patients will be defined as one or more of the following: Any new disease and/or clear progression of evaluable disease; OR 2 fold elevation in CA-125 from its lowest level (either initial level or nadir, whichever is lowest, since study enrollment) combined with CA-125 elevation confirmed by re-assay at any time.

All evaluable patients

→

Reported safety

Serious events are not the same as severe events. Compare the original safety groups and their at-risk populations.

Open the study safety table →

Quality of life and patient-reported measures

No linked quality-of-life measure is recorded for this setting and study.

Full draft applicability and source-link record
trial
release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
nct id
NCT02283658
trial label
Everolimus and Letrozole in Treating Patients With Recurrent Hormone Receptor Positive Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer
applicability
narrower
applicability note
Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. The condition was transformed or resolved through the terminology hierarchy to reach this cancer type, so the link itself is a candidate a reviewer must confirm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
provenance class
registry-condition-search
discovery note
Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.
outcome Count
6
harms Count
1
qol Count
0
outcomes
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0000
    source section id
    NCT02283658-om-0000
    source outcome index
    0
    endpoint
    Percentage of Patients Alive and Progression Free Survival at 12 Weeks
    endpoint definition
    The percentage of PFS12 successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the exact binomial method. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), Disease progression in evaluable patients will be defined as one or more of the following: * Any new disease and/or clear progression of evaluable disease; OR * 2 fold elevation in CA-125 from its lowest level (either initial level or nadir, whichever is lowest, since study enrollment) combined with CA-125 elevation confirmed by re-assay at any time.
    time origin
    12 weeks
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    All evaluable patients
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0001
    source section id
    NCT02283658-om-0001
    source outcome index
    1
    endpoint
    Percentage of Participants With CA-125 Response
    endpoint definition
    CA-125 response: The key secondary endpoint of the study will be a CA-125 response, defined as a 50% or greater reduction in baseline CA-125. The null hypothesis will be set at CA-125 response rate of 8.3%, based on the response of single agent letrozole, as reported by Bowman et al (7). The treatment of letrozole and everolimus will be considered promising, based on CA-125, if the observed CA-125 response rate is 30% or more.
    time origin
    Up to 2 years
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    All evaluable patients
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0002
    source section id
    NCT02283658-om-0002
    source outcome index
    2
    endpoint
    Confirmed Response Rate, Estimated Using RECIST 1.1 Criteria
    endpoint definition
    A confirmed tumor response is defined to be either a complete response or partial response noted as the objective status on 2 consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. A complete response (CR) in evaluable patients will be defined as: * Disappearance of any sign of (evaluable) disease, AND * Normalization of CA-125; if CA-125 normalizes, it should be confirmed at any time. A partial response (PR) in evaluable patients will be defined as: * Decrement in CA-125 by \>50%, and * Improvement in any additional evaluable disease (if present) as assessed by the enrolling physician.
    time origin
    Up to 24 weeks
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    All evaluable patients
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0003
    source section id
    NCT02283658-om-0003
    source outcome index
    3
    endpoint
    Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events
    endpoint definition
    The number of patients with adverse events.The maximum grade for each type of adverse event (AE) will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine AE patterns. These tables are reported in the adverse events section of this report.
    time origin
    Up to 30 days post-treatment
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    All evaluable patients
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0004
    source section id
    NCT02283658-om-0004
    source outcome index
    4
    endpoint
    Overall Suravival(OS)
    endpoint definition
    OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
    time origin
    Time from registration to death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    All evaluable patients
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0005
    source section id
    NCT02283658-om-0005
    source outcome index
    5
    endpoint
    Progression Free Survival (PFS)
    endpoint definition
    PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), Disease progression in evaluable patients will be defined as one or more of the following: Any new disease and/or clear progression of evaluable disease; OR 2 fold elevation in CA-125 from its lowest level (either initial level or nadir, whichever is lowest, since study enrollment) combined with CA-125 elevation confirmed by re-assay at any time.
    time origin
    Time from registration to the first of either disease progression or death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    All evaluable patients
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
arms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0000
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Treatment (Everolimus and Letrozole)
    regimen
    Patients receive everolimus PO QD and letrozole PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    19
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT02283658-om-0000#groups/OG000
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Treatment (Everolimus and Letrozole)
    regimen
    Patients receive everolimus PO QD and letrozole PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    19
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT02283658-om-0001#groups/OG000
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Treatment (Everolimus and Letrozole)
    regimen
    Patients receive everolimus PO QD and letrozole PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    19
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT02283658-om-0002#groups/OG000
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Treatment (Everolimus and Letrozole)
    regimen
    Patients receive everolimus PO QD and letrozole PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    19
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT02283658-om-0003#groups/OG000
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Treatment (Everolimus and Letrozole)
    regimen
    Patients receive everolimus PO QD and letrozole PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    19
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT02283658-om-0004#groups/OG000
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Treatment (Everolimus and Letrozole)
    regimen
    Patients receive everolimus PO QD and letrozole PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    analyzed count
    19
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT02283658-om-0005#groups/OG000
harms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-malignant-fallopian-tube-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT02283658
    harm key
    EG000
    source section id
    NCT02283658-ae
    event group key
    EG000
    event group label
    Treatment (Everolimus and Letrozole)
    serious affected
    10
    serious at risk
    19
    other affected
    19
    other at risk
    19
    frequency threshold
    0
    collection period
    2 years
    event definition
    The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for AE reporting. All appropriate treatment areas should have access to a copy of the CTCAE version 4.0.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
quality of life
    setting source links

      Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice