Skip to content
← Head and Neck Neoplasm

NCT03765918 · STUDY IN CONTEXT

Study of Pembrolizumab Given Prior to Surgery and in Combination With Radiotherapy Given Post-surgery for Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (MK-3475-689)

Draft scope assessment: narrower. Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. The condition was transformed or resolved through the terminology hierarchy to reach this cancer type, so the link itself is a candidate a reviewer must confirm. Found because this study's registry identifier is printed in an FDA approval notice, an FDA product label or an NCI summary held by this site. The citing document and the exact position of the identifier inside it are recorded. Being cited is not a statement that the study supports this treatment.

Read the full study record and all posted results →

Linked outcomes

Measures are not ranked. Open each original source section for treatment groups, denominators, units and results.

secondary · POSTED

mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by blinded independent pathologist review (BIPR) at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants was presented.

Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.

→

secondary · POSTED

mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.

→

secondary · POSTED

mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.

→

secondary · POSTED

pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants was presented.

Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.

→

secondary · POSTED

pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.

→

secondary · POSTED

pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.

→

Reported safety

Serious events are not the same as severe events. Compare the original safety groups and their at-risk populations.

Open the study safety table →

Quality of life and patient-reported measures

EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QoL) (Items 29 & 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 4

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0006
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0006
source outcome index
6
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QoL) (Items 29 & 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0007
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0007
source outcome index
7
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0008
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0008
source outcome index
8
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 6

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0009
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0009
source outcome index
9
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0010
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0010
source outcome index
10
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0011
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0011
source outcome index
11
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 25

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0012
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0012
source outcome index
12
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0013
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0013
source outcome index
13
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0014
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0014
source outcome index
14
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 51

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0015
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0015
source outcome index
15
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0016
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0016
source outcome index
16
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0017
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0017
source outcome index
17
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 4

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0018
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0018
source outcome index
18
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0019
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0019
source outcome index
19
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0020
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0020
source outcome index
20
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 6

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0021
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0021
source outcome index
21
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0022
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0022
source outcome index
22
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0023
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0023
source outcome index
23
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 25

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0024
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0024
source outcome index
24
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0025
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0025
source outcome index
25
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0026
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0026
source outcome index
26
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 51

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0027
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0027
source outcome index
27
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0028
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0028
source outcome index
28
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0029
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0029
source outcome index
29
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher score indicated a better
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-Head and Neck Module 35 [H&N35] (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0030
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0030
source outcome index
30
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-Head and Neck Module 35 [H&N35] (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0031
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0031
source outcome index
31
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0032
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0032
source outcome index
32
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0033
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0033
source outcome index
33
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0034
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0034
source outcome index
34
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0035
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0035
source outcome index
35
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0036
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0036
source outcome index
36
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0037
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0037
source outcome index
37
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0038
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0038
source outcome index
38
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0039
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0039
source outcome index
39
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0040
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0040
source outcome index
40
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0041
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0041
source outcome index
41
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0042
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0042
source outcome index
42
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0043
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0043
source outcome index
43
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0044
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0044
source outcome index
44
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0045
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0045
source outcome index
45
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0046
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0046
source outcome index
46
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0047
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0047
source outcome index
47
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0048
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0048
source outcome index
48
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0049
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0049
source outcome index
49
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0050
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0050
source outcome index
50
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0051
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0051
source outcome index
51
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0052
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0052
source outcome index
52
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0053
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0053
source outcome index
53
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0054
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0054
source outcome index
54
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0055
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0055
source outcome index
55
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0056
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0056
source outcome index
56
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 4
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0057
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0057
source outcome index
57
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0058
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0058
source outcome index
58
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0059
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0059
source outcome index
59
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 6
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0060
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0060
source outcome index
60
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0061
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0061
source outcome index
61
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0062
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0062
source outcome index
62
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 25
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0063
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0063
source outcome index
63
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0064
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0064
source outcome index
64
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
qol key
qol-0065
source section id
NCT03765918-om-0065
source outcome index
65
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
time frame
Baseline and Week 51
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Full draft applicability and source-link record
trial
release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
nct id
NCT03765918
trial label
Study of Pembrolizumab Given Prior to Surgery and in Combination With Radiotherapy Given Post-surgery for Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (MK-3475-689)
applicability
narrower
applicability note
Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. The condition was transformed or resolved through the terminology hierarchy to reach this cancer type, so the link itself is a candidate a reviewer must confirm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
provenance class
regulator-cited
discovery note
Found because this study's registry identifier is printed in an FDA approval notice, an FDA product label or an NCI summary held by this site. The citing document and the exact position of the identifier inside it are recorded. Being cited is not a statement that the study supports this treatment.
outcome Count
6
harms Count
2
qol Count
60
outcomes
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0000
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0000
    source outcome index
    0
    endpoint
    Major Pathological Response (mPR) Rate
    endpoint definition
    mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by blinded independent pathologist review (BIPR) at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants was presented.
    time origin
    Up to ~66 months
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0001
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0001
    source outcome index
    1
    endpoint
    mPR Rate in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10
    endpoint definition
    mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
    time origin
    Up to ~66 months
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0002
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0002
    source outcome index
    2
    endpoint
    mPR Rate in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1
    endpoint definition
    mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
    time origin
    Up to ~66 months
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0003
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0003
    source outcome index
    3
    endpoint
    Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate
    endpoint definition
    pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants was presented.
    time origin
    Up to ~66 months
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0004
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0004
    source outcome index
    4
    endpoint
    pCR Rate in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10
    endpoint definition
    pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
    time origin
    Up to ~66 months
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0005
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0005
    source outcome index
    5
    endpoint
    pCR Rate in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1
    endpoint definition
    pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
    time origin
    Up to ~66 months
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Efficacy analysis population, which included all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1. Per protocol, two participants in the SOC arm received neoadjuvant treatment in error (protocol deviations) and were included in the SOC arm for efficacy analysis.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
arms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0000
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Pembrolizumab + Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Neoadjuvant treatment: Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab by intravenous (IV) infusion administered on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (up to 6 weeks) prior to surgery. Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 15 cycles (up to 45 weeks) plus investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    363
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0000#groups/OG000
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0000
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    351
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0000#groups/OG001
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Pembrolizumab + Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Neoadjuvant treatment: Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab by intravenous (IV) infusion administered on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (up to 6 weeks) prior to surgery. Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 15 cycles (up to 45 weeks) plus investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    234
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0001#groups/OG000
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    231
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0001#groups/OG001
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Pembrolizumab + Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Neoadjuvant treatment: Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab by intravenous (IV) infusion administered on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (up to 6 weeks) prior to surgery. Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 15 cycles (up to 45 weeks) plus investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    347
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0002#groups/OG000
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    335
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0002#groups/OG001
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Pembrolizumab + Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Neoadjuvant treatment: Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab by intravenous (IV) infusion administered on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (up to 6 weeks) prior to surgery. Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 15 cycles (up to 45 weeks) plus investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    363
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0003#groups/OG000
  8. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    351
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0003#groups/OG001
  9. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Pembrolizumab + Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Neoadjuvant treatment: Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab by intravenous (IV) infusion administered on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (up to 6 weeks) prior to surgery. Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 15 cycles (up to 45 weeks) plus investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    234
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0004#groups/OG000
  10. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    231
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0004#groups/OG001
  11. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Pembrolizumab + Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Neoadjuvant treatment: Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab by intravenous (IV) infusion administered on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (up to 6 weeks) prior to surgery. Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 15 cycles (up to 45 weeks) plus investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    347
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0005#groups/OG000
  12. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Standard of Care (SOC)
    regimen
    Adjuvant treatment: Following surgical resection, participants received investigator's choice of SOC treatment regimen consisting of radiotherapy, with or without cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2, IV infusion, on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles (up to 9 weeks).
    analyzed count
    335
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT03765918-om-0005#groups/OG001
harms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    harm key
    EG000
    source section id
    NCT03765918-ae
    event group key
    EG000
    event group label
    Pembrolizumab + Standard of Care (SOC)
    serious affected
    179
    serious at risk
    361
    other affected
    335
    other at risk
    361
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Up to ~66 months
    event definition
    All-Cause Mortality includes all randomized participants. Serious and Other AEs include the safety analysis population. Per protocol, disease progression of cancer under study was not considered an AE unless considered related to study treatment. Thus, MedDRA preferred terms "Neoplasm progression", "Malignant neoplasm progression" \& "Disease progression" not related to study treatment are excluded as AEs. Data are reported by treatment received.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    harm key
    EG001
    source section id
    NCT03765918-ae
    event group key
    EG001
    event group label
    Standard of Care (SOC)
    serious affected
    116
    serious at risk
    315
    other affected
    290
    other at risk
    315
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Up to ~66 months
    event definition
    All-Cause Mortality includes all randomized participants. Serious and Other AEs include the safety analysis population. Per protocol, disease progression of cancer under study was not considered an AE unless considered related to study treatment. Thus, MedDRA preferred terms "Neoplasm progression", "Malignant neoplasm progression" \& "Disease progression" not related to study treatment are excluded as AEs. Data are reported by treatment received.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
quality of life
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0006
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0006
    source outcome index
    6
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QoL) (Items 29 & 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 4
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 4
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0007
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0007
    source outcome index
    7
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 4
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0008
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0008
    source outcome index
    8
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 4
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 4. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0009
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0009
    source outcome index
    9
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 6
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 6
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0010
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0010
    source outcome index
    10
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 6
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0011
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0011
    source outcome index
    11
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 6
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC treatment group who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 6. Per protocol, this outcome measure was only reported in participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0012
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0012
    source outcome index
    12
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 25
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 25
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  8. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0013
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0013
    source outcome index
    13
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 25
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  9. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0014
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0014
    source outcome index
    14
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Adjuvant Treatment: Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 25
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 25.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  10. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0015
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0015
    source outcome index
    15
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 51
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 51
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  11. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0016
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0016
    source outcome index
    16
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 51
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  12. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-head-and-neck-neoplasm
    nct id
    NCT03765918
    qol key
    qol-0017
    source section id
    NCT03765918-om-0017
    source outcome index
    17
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.
    time frame
    Baseline and Week 51
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher score indicated a better
    population note
    All randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment data available for this outcome measure at Baseline and at Week 51.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
setting source links

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice